Optical waveguides – With optical coupler – Plural
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-12
2001-04-24
Font, Frank G. (Department: 2877)
Optical waveguides
With optical coupler
Plural
C385S046000, C385S039000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06222956
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, and more particularly to an optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, in which the fluctuation of an optical insertion loss caused by the fluctuation of wavelengths can be decreased.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In recent years, as a communication system providing an information service with high speed and large capacity, a WDM (Wavelength Division Multiplexing) optical communication system has been developed. In particular, an optical communication system using an arrayed waveguide diffraction grating as an optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, in which plural optical signals with different wavelengths can be multiplexed or demultiplexed, is greatly expected. For example, this type of optical communication systems using an arrayed waveguide diffraction grating are disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos. 4-116607,4-163406, 4-220602, 4-326308, 5-157920, etc.
In the conventional arrayed waveguide diffraction grating type optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, when a pass band characteristic is flattened, the fluctuation of an optical insertion loss caused by the wavelength fluctuation of a light source is relatively small, so that optical signals can be multiplexed and/or demultiplexed in a static state. Accordingly, the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating type optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer is especially expected as an effective device for the optical WDM communication. This advantageous feature of the optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,744.
As a structure of an optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer using an arrayed waveguide diffraction grating, a structure comprising an input waveguide and output waveguides which are coupled to both ends of an arrayed waveguide diffraction grating via an input slub waveguide and an output slab waveguide, respectively, has been known.
FIG. 1
shows a structure of a conventional optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer of this type, wherein the optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer comprises a substrate
1
, an input waveguide
2
formed on one side of the substrate
1
, output waveguides
3
formed on another side of the substrate
1
, and an arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
formed on a central portion of the substrate
1
, wherein the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
is composed of a plurality of channel waveguides
5
in parallel having predetermined path lengths.
The optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer further comprises an input slub waveguide
6
for coupling the input waveguide
2
and the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
, an output slub waveguide
7
for coupling the output waveguides
3
and the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
, and a mode conversion portion
8
provided between the input waveguide
2
and the input slab waveguide
6
for flattening the optical loss-wavelength characteristics.
For example, in this conventional optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, for demultiplexing multiplexed optical signals, multiplexed optical signals &lgr;
1
to &lgr;
9
each having different wavelengths, wherein &lgr;
1
to &lgr;
9
indicate different wavelengths and the relation &lgr;
1
<&lgr;
2
< - - - <&lgr;
8
<&lgr;
9
is set, are input from the input waveguide
2
and transmitted through the mode conversion portion
8
, then radiated into the input slab waveguide
6
. Next, the multiplexed optical signals &lgr;
1
to &lgr;
9
are divided at an input end
9
of the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
, then transmitted through the channel waveguides
5
and an output end
10
of the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
, and focused at a focusing plane
11
of the output slab waveguide
7
. Thus, the multiplexed optical signals &lgr;
1
to &lgr;
9
are demultiplexed and output from the output waveguides
3
having nine ends as demultiplexed optical signals &lgr;
1
, &lgr;
2
- - - &lgr;
9
, respectively.
According to the conventional optical waveguide multiplexer/demultiplexer, however, the optical characteristics required for practical use cannot be obtained sufficiently. For example, when the optical characteristics of the device is influenced by the stigmatism of the output slub waveguides, etc., the flatness of the optical insertion loss in the pass band becomes insufficient. Accordingly, if the wavelength shows a slight fluctuation, the optical insertion loss characteristic of the waveguide will be greatly fluctuated.
Next, thisphenomenon will be explained referring to
FIGS. 2A
,
2
B, and
2
C to
5
.
FIGS. 2A
to
2
C show electric field distributions at the mode conversion portion
8
in the direction A-A′, the input end
9
of the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
in the direction B-B′, and the output end
10
in the direction C-C′, respectively. At the mode conversion portion
8
, an electric field distribution
13
′ has a twin-peaks-shape profile. At the input end
9
, because of the diffraction effect, an electric field distribution
14
, has a maximum peak L′ and minimum peaks m
1
′ and m
2
′. At the output end
10
, an electric field distribution
15
′ reprises a profile of the electric field distribution
14
′ at the input end
9
.
FIGS. 3A
to
3
C show phase distributions of the optical signals &lgr;
1
, &lgr;
5
, and &lgr;
9
at the output end
10
of the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
, respectively. A phase distribution
17
′ of the optical signal &lgr;
5
shows a symmetric phase profile as shown in FIG.
3
B. On the other hand, a phase distribution
16
′ of the optical signal &lgr;
1
and a phase distribution
18
′ of the optical signal &lgr;
9
show asymmetric phase profiles as shown in
FIGS. 3A and 3C
, respectively.
It is because that the optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer is designed based on a propagation constant of an intermediate wavelength &lgr;
5
. Namely, comparing with the phase profile of the optical signal &lgr;
5
, the phase profiles of the optical signals &lgr;
1
and &lgr;
9
are inclined to the arrayed waveguide diffraction grating
4
in accordance with the respective propagation constants thereof.
Accordingly, a phase profile
19
′ of
FIG. 3D
, which is a phase difference between the phase distributions
16
′ and
17
′ shown in
FIGS. 3A and 3B
, shows a continued inclination in the right upper direction. On the other hand, a phase profile
21
′ of
FIG. 3E
, which is a phase difference between the phase distributions
17
′ and
18
′ shown in
FIGS. 3B and 3C
, shows a continued inclination in the left upper direction which is opposite to that of FIG.
3
D.
A length difference &Dgr;
L
between two adjacent channel waveguides
5
based on the propagation constant of the intermediate wavelength &lgr;
5
is determined by a following formula (1):
&Dgr;
L
=2
·m
·&pgr;/&bgr;(&lgr;
5
) (1)
wherein, m is a diffraction order number (a positive integer) and &bgr;(&lgr;
5
) is a propagation constant of the channel waveguides for the optical signal &lgr;
5
.
FIG. 4
shows an electric field distribution at the focusing plane
11
in the direction D-D′.
As shown in
FIG. 4
, an electric field distribution
24
′ at a position x
5
corresponding to the optical signal &lgr;
5
has a symmetric twin-peaks-shape profile, similarly to the electric field distribution at the mode conversion portion
8
. On the other hand, an electric field distribution
23
′ of the optical signals &lgr;
1
at a terminal position x
1
and an electric field distribution of the optical signal &lgr;
9
at a terminal position x
9
have asymmetric profiles, respectively, because of the stigmatism of the output slab waveguide
7
.
The optical insertion loss of the output waveguides
3
are determined by a multiplexed integral of an electric field distribution of optical signals at t
Akiba Kenji
Inaba Kimio
Morosawa Kenichi
Font Frank G.
Hitachi Cable Ltd.
McDermott & Will & Emery
LandOfFree
Optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Optical wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2467015