Optics: eye examining – vision testing and correcting – Eye examining or testing instrument – Objective type
Reexamination Certificate
1999-09-27
2001-06-12
Manuel, George (Department: 3737)
Optics: eye examining, vision testing and correcting
Eye examining or testing instrument
Objective type
Reexamination Certificate
active
06244712
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to an optical imaging apparatus and associated methods and, more particularly, to an optical scanning spectroscopic apparatus and associated methods for generating images of the posterior portion of a subject's eye.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
By examining the posterior portions of a subject's eye, such as the retinal vessels and the choroidal vessels, a significant amount of data can be collected for various diagnostic and analytical applications. For example, the blood oxygen saturation or blood oxygen content of the blood in the retinal vessels is determinative of the arteriovenous oxygen difference as described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,308,919 to Thomas E. Minnich, U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,060 to Matthew H. Smith, et. al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,076 to Matthew H. Smith, et. al. Based upon the arteriovenous oxygen difference, the cardiac output of the subject can be determined in order to assist in post-operative monitoring and the management of critically ill patients. By monitoring the blood oxygen saturation, the loss of blood can also be detected and the rate and quantity of blood loss over time can be estimated as described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,119,814 to Thomas E. Minnich.
In addition to blood oxygen saturation, retinal tissue perfusion can be monitored by observing the color of cytochromes, such as cytochrome oxidase a3, within the tissue cells. Further, by observing the magnitude of the choroidal reflectance pulsation across the cardiac cycle, such as with a pulse oximeter, the choroidal oxygenation can also be monitored. See J. P. de Kock, L. Tarrassenko, C. J. Glynn, A. R. Hill, “Reflectance Pulse Oximetry Measurements from the Retinal Fundus,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 8, 817-23 (1993). In addition to the foregoing examples, a number of other anatomic features and physiological parameters, such as the degree of melanin pigmentation of the fundus, can be determined by examining the posterior portion of a subject's eye, as described by F. C. Delori, K. P. Phlibsen, “Spectral reflectance of the human ocular fundus,” Applied Optics, vol. 28, no. 6, 1061-77 (1989).
In order to examine the posterior portion of a subject's eye, several non-invasive techniques have been developed. In this regard, the traditional technique for examining the posterior portions of a subject's eye is fundus photography. Fundus photography illuminates a subject's eye with a flash of white light. Fundus photography then detects the light returning from the subject's eye, such as a result of the reflection of a portion of the light from the retinal and choroidal vessels, as well as the reflection and scattering of portions of the light from other features of the posterior portion of the subject's eye. Since the subject's eye is initially illuminated with white light, fundus photography typically spectrally separates the light that returns from the subject's eye in order to separately evaluate the signals that return from the subject's eye at different wavelengths of interest.
Because traditional fundus photography involves illuminating the subject's eye with a flash of white light, care must generally be taken to ensure that the subject's eye is not exposed to excessively high levels of light that could harm the subject's eye. In this regard, the Food and Drug Administration has defined maximum allowable amounts of light to which an eye can be exposed over a certain time period. As such, the intensity of the flash of white light must generally be maintained below some relatively low threshold, such as below about 100 mJ/cm
2
in order to protect the subject's eye. Since the flash of white light must generally be maintained below some threshold, the resulting signal to noise ratio of the signals returning from the posterior portion of the subject's eye is also relatively low in comparison to the higher signal to noise ratios that would be obtained if the flash of white light could have a greater intensity. As a result of the relatively low signal to noise ratio, at least some of the signals returning from the posterior portions of the subject's eye generally are lost in the noise, and the overall validity or credibility of the signals returning from the posterior portions of the subject's eye is subject to more questions.
Even though the flash of white light that illuminates a subject's eye in traditional fundus photography is somewhat limited in order to protect the subject's eye, the flash of white light is still generally sufficiently intense to prevent closely spaced, serial measurements from being obtained. In this regard, the flash of white light is still sufficiently intense to cause the pupil of the subject's eye to constrict and, in some instances, to cause the metabolism of the subject's eye to be altered. In order to monitor the posterior portions of the subject's eye under consistent conditions, traditional fundus photography must therefore wait until the subject's pupil is no longer constricted prior to collecting another image of the posterior portions of the subject's eye, thereby disadvantageously delaying the entire examination process.
More recently, scanning laser opthalmoscopes have addressed at least some of the shortcomings of traditional fundus photography. For a general description of scanning laser opthalmoscopes, see Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Ophthalmology, Barry R. Masters, editor, Chapter 22, Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, by Robert H. Webb, Springer-Verlag, N.Y. (1990). Conventional scanning laser opthalmoscopes have a single laser source. The scanning laser opthalmoscope scans the laser signals emitted by the laser source in a predetermined pattern across posterior portions of a subject's eye to thereby define a frame having a number of scan lines. Since a single laser is employed, the resulting image will only provide information relating to the posterior portion of the eye at the one particular wavelength.
A more recent scanning laser opthalmoscope developed by OPTOS P.L.C. of Fife, United Kingdom apparently includes three laser sources, each of which emits light of a different wavelength. This scanning laser opthalmoscope is designed to simultaneously illuminate the subject's eye by scanning laser signals emitted by each of the three lasers across the posterior portion of the subject's eye.
This scanning laser opthalmoscope also typically includes dichroic beam splitters for separating the signals that return from the posterior portions of the subject's eye based upon the wavelength of the return signals. As such, the return signals attributable to the laser signals emitted by each of the laser sources are effectively separated and can therefore be individually analyzed.
Since this more recent scanning laser opthalmoscope simultaneously illuminates a subject's eye with the laser signals emitted by each of the laser sources, this scanning laser opthalmoscope may also have the potential to expose the subject's eye to excessive amounts of light. As such, the intensity of the laser signals emitted by each of the laser sources is generally maintained at a relatively low level, such as below about 10 uW such that the cumulative intensity of the laser signals remains safe for the subject's eye. As such, the signal-to-noise ratio of the signals returning from the posterior portions of the subject's eye is therefore correspondingly reduced relative to the signal-to-noise ratio of the return signals that would be possible if the intensity of the laser signals emitted by each of the laser sources were not reduced in order to protect the subject's eye. At least some of the signals returning from the posterior portion of the subject's eye will therefore be lost in the noise and the overall validity of the return signals will be somewhat more questionable due to the lower signal-to-noise ratio.
In addition, it h
Chipman Russell A.
Denninghoff Kurt R.
Hillman Lloyd W.
Smith Matthew H.
Alston & Bird LLP
Manuel George
University of Alabama in Huntsville
LandOfFree
Optical scanning spectroscopic apparatus and associated method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Optical scanning spectroscopic apparatus and associated method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Optical scanning spectroscopic apparatus and associated method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2518979