Optics: image projectors – Distortion compensation – For projection axis inclined to screen
Reexamination Certificate
1999-06-17
2001-12-11
Dowling, William (Department: 2851)
Optics: image projectors
Distortion compensation
For projection axis inclined to screen
Reexamination Certificate
active
06328448
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention was made with U.S. Government support, and the Government has certain rights in the invention.
This invention relates to the field of optical display and, more particularly, to an optical system and method for displaying an image. In one preferred form of the invention, an image is projected and displayed on a solid panel display device.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the field of image projection of a rectilinear object to a proportionately enlarged or reduced rectilinear image (as represented by conventional photographic enlargers and slide projectors), the entire image is projected typically upon a single plane (e.g., in the enlarger, to the photographic paper; and from the slide projector, to the screen). A more difficult task arises when an image must be projected into a display device having two separate image surfaces for the vertical and horizontal components of the image; each of which requires independent magnification and focus of the vertical and of the horizontal image components. The problem is further complicated when one of the image surfaces is tilted with respect to the projection axis; the tilt being so significant that conventional image focus will not be sustained along the full image surfaces. The two disparate image surfaces must be illuminated in such a manner that the vertical and the horizontal image components maintain independent focus along their respective tilted surfaces. Further, since projected images generally expand (or enlarge) over progressively greater projected field distances, tilted image surfaces are also subject to “keystoning”, whereby one dimension (say, the horizontal “width”) is enlarged progressively more as viewed from the “top” or the “bottom” of the image.
An example of a device which requires such image handling is represented in U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,502 entitled, “Flat or Curved Thin Optical Display Panel”.
FIG. 1
illustrates the type of panel construction described in the '502 Patent. The panel comprises a stack of thin waveguide-like transparent lamina
111
each of typical thickness t. When the stack is cut at an acute angle S, each lamination exhibits a height h at the display surface such that h=t sec S. Thus, with S measuring typically about 70°, h is significantly larger than t. Also, the full display height H is larger than the base thickness T by the same factor, sec S.
The device of the '502 Patent is called a “polyplanar optic display” (POD). The rightmost portion of the POD is represented primarily in
FIG. 1
as an isometric view. The full width W is typically wider than its display height H. The portion which is detailed serves to describe the operation of the POD and is useful in understanding its relationship to the present invention. Each lamination (of thickness t) of the panel is a transparent sheet (glass or plastic) of nominal optical index of refraction n
1
, separated by thin coatings of index of refraction n
2
, where n
1
>n
2
. Light entering the laminations at the base is separated into sheets and is confined to its respective sheets by total internal reflection at the interfaces. Thus, light focused at the base will retain “vertical” resolution elements of thickness t (in the “T”-direction) throughout its propagation “upward” to the display surface, where each thickness t is displayed as a corresponding resolvable height h. In the width W direction, however, there is no confinement of the input illumination, and each sheet propagates its respective slice (in the width direction) as would a continuous transparent medium. This requires that the horizontal image components be focused over varying distances corresponding to the tipped viewing surface. While the vertical component of the projected image must focus near the base, the horizontal information must focus near the sloping plane of the display surface; those components at the “bottom” of the display focusing close to the base, and those higher focusing at progressively greater distances to represent image elements approaching the top of the display. Also, while propagating through the lamina, the horizontal components expand progressively as an extension to the expanding illuminating field. Unless corrected, this generates keystoning, whereby (in this example) the top of the displayed image becomes wider than that at the bottom.
It is among the objects of the present invention to solve image handling problems of the type described above and also to provide image projection that can be used in conjunction with a POD type of display panel.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one form of the invention, an optical system is disclosed for displaying an image of an object. A display device is provided and has an input surface and an output surface. Means are provided for illuminating the object so that light from the object is directed toward said input surface. Anamorphic optical means is disposed in the light path between the object and the input surface, the anamorphic optical means being operative to focus one directional component of the image at the input surface and to focus a different directional component of the image at the output surface.
In an embodiment of the invention, the display device is a panel device formed of a solid material and having disparate imaging surfaces for said different directional components, at least one of said imaging surfaces being non-perpendicular to the optical axis of the light. In this embodiment the object is a planar object tipped with respect to said optical axis by an angle that satisfies the Scheimpflug condition for said at least one of said imaging surfaces, the angle taking into account the refractive effect of the solid material on said light.
Also, in this embodiment a telecentric optical component can be disposed in the path of the light to correct for keystoning of said image.
Further features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1932082 (1933-10-01), Newcomer
patent: 3212397 (1965-10-01), Miller
patent: 3339454 (1967-09-01), Weiner
patent: 3508822 (1970-04-01), Cornell et al.
patent: 3655260 (1972-04-01), Bartucci et al.
patent: 3832046 (1974-08-01), Mecklenborg
patent: 4116739 (1978-09-01), Glenn
patent: 4208096 (1980-06-01), Glenn, Jr.
patent: 4428676 (1984-01-01), Chastang et al.
patent: 4929066 (1990-05-01), Wakimoto et al.
patent: 5220363 (1993-06-01), Sato et al.
patent: 5274406 (1993-12-01), Tejima et al.
patent: 5381502 (1995-01-01), Veligdan
patent: 5422691 (1995-06-01), Ninimiya et al.
patent: 5455882 (1995-10-01), Veligdan
patent: 5668907 (1997-09-01), Veligdan
patent: 5709445 (1998-01-01), Takamoto
patent: 5820240 (1998-10-01), Ohzawa
patent: 6012816 (2000-01-01), Beiser
“Ten Inch Planar Optic Display”, L. Beiser & J. Veligdan, presented at SPIE Symposium, Orlando, Florida, Apr. 10, 1996. Published in SPIE Proc., vol. 2734, pp. 57-63 (1996).
“Telecentric Wide Angle Lens For LCD Rear Projection”, J. Brian Caldwell, Optics & Photonics News, Aug. 1997.
Dowling William
Reed Smith LLP
Scram Technologies, Inc.
LandOfFree
Optical projection apparatus and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Optical projection apparatus and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Optical projection apparatus and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2559184