Online syndicated content feed metrics

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Remote data accessing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S219000, C709S224000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07620697

ABSTRACT:
Tools and techniques are provided to help estimate the number of unique subscribers to an RSS, Atom, or other online syndicated content feed. Methods, systems, and other embodiments separate feed polling events into groups based at least partially on regularity in their times of occurrence. Grouping of polling events may also be based on client values, such as a client's IP address or user agent identification. Each located group corresponds to one likely subscriber in an estimation of the total number of subscribers to the feed. The use of occurrence times and client header values may be combined with unique URLs, cookies, and other tools to further refine readership estimates.

REFERENCES:
patent: 2003/0200140 (2003-10-01), Hars
patent: 2005/0165615 (2005-07-01), Minar
patent: 2005/0188403 (2005-08-01), Kotzin
patent: 2005/0267973 (2005-12-01), Carlson
patent: 2006/0095507 (2006-05-01), Watson
patent: 2006/0277291 (2006-12-01), Misbach
patent: 2007/0088832 (2007-04-01), Tsang et al.
patent: 2007/0100959 (2007-05-01), Eichstaedt et al.
patent: 2007/0198701 (2007-08-01), Pindra et al.
N. Saito, “The Local Fourier Dictionary: A Natural Tool . . . ”, Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing VII (Unser et al., eds), Proc. SPIE 3813, pp. 610-6124, 1999.
J-P. Micek, “RSS Traffic Tracking”, www.advancebusinessblogging.com, Jan. 22, 2005.
SiteCatalyst Implementation Manual, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 from http://w2.byuh.edu/webmasters/, copyright Oct. 28, 2005.
A. C. Gilbert et al., “One-pass wavelet decompositions of data streams”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 541-554, 2003.
Ian Kaplan, “Wavelets and Signal Processing”, www.bearcave.com, copyright 2001-2003.
H. Liu et al., “Client Behavior and Feed Characteristics of RSS, a Publish-Subscribe System for Web Micronews”, Proc. IMC '05: Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 29-34, 2005.
W. Sweldens, “The Lifting Scheme: A New Philosophy . . . ”, Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing III (Laine et al., eds), Proc. SPIE 2569, pp. 68-79, 1995.
Abstract of G. Fernández et al, “LIFTPACK: A Software Package for Wavelet Transforms using Lifting”, cm.bell-labs.com, (Feb. 26, 2006).
R. Hrastnik, “ClickZ Doesn't Get RSS Metrics—How We Really Can Measure RSS”, rssdiary.marketingstudies.net, Aug. 11, 2005.
S. Spencer, “RSS and SEO: Implications for Search Marketers”, www.stephanspencer.com, Mar. 2, 2005.
D. McLellan, “Podcast Aggregators Should Support Cookies”, allinthehead.com, Mar. 8, 2005.
J. Udell, “The business of RSS”, weblog.infoworld.com/udell, May 28, 2003.
T. Bray, “Counting Subscribers”, www.tbray.org/ongoing, May 25, 2003.
M. Nottingham, “RSS, Subscribers and Business Models (oh, my!)”, www.mnot.net/blog, May 25, 2003.
J. Brome, “Counting Subscribers”, www.jasonbrome.com/blog, May 27, 2003.
L. Notenboom, “Is there a way to track unique subscribers to my RSS feed?”, ask-leo.com, Jan. 3, 2004.
A. Gahran, “How Many People Read Your Webfeed?”, contentious.com, Jun. 3, 2004.
A. Gahran, “Estimating RSS Readership: One Suggestion”, contentious.com, Mar. 11, 2004.
M. Hedlund, “Anticipating RSS Spam”, www.oreillynet.com, Mar. 23, 2004.
Pages from www.syndicateiq.com, available in shown form no later than Jan. 16, 2006, available in some form at least as early as Jan. 18, 2005.
“Definitions of xslt on the Web”, www.google.com, Jan. 16, 2006.
Pages from www.imninc.com, no later than Jan. 16, 2006.
D. Winer, “Bootstrap: How to redirect an RSS feed”, radio.userland.com/stories, Oct. 21, 2002.
O. Malik, “RSS, Tiger Safari and the Bandwidth Bottleneck”, www.gigaom.com, Apr. 18, 2005.
“Quick reference to HTTP headers”, www.cs.tut.fi/˜jkorpela, Apr. 6, 2004.
Excerpts from “All Things Distributed”, weblogs.cs.cornell.edu, Mar. 18, 2004.
“Definitions of fourier analysis on the Web”, www.google.com, Feb. 19, 2006.
A. Gahran, “The Holy Grail: Trackable RSS”, www.poynter.org, Mar. 3, 2004.
“Atom (standard)”, en.wikipedia.org, no later than Feb. 20, 2006.
“Really Simple Stealing”, avc.blogs.com, Jul. 12, 2005.
R. Hrastnik, “RSS Metrics Focus: Interview . . . ”, rssdiary.marketingstudies.net, Jun. 14, 2005.
J-P. Micek, “RSS Traffic Tracking”, www.advancedbusinessblogging.com, Jan. 22, 2005.
S. Falkow, “Online PR and Media Relations”, falkow.blogsite.com, Feb. 22, 2006.
T. Jarrett, “Measuring blogs . . . ”, www.jarretthousenorth.com, mid-2003.
R. Hrastnik, “RSS Works: Hard Metrics to Prove It”, www.rss-specifications.com, copyright 2005.
R. Hrastnik, “New RSS Metrics Service from Pheedo . . . ”, rssdiary.marketingstudies.net, Nov. 16, 2005.
Pages from www.feedburner.com, no later than Jan. 16, 2006.
R. Hrastnik, “RSS Industry Night Roundtable: IRSS Solution Coming”, rssdiary.marketingstudies.net, Dec. 14, 2005.
S. Gatz, “Last Night's RSS Marketing Industry ‘Roundtable’”, www.scottgatz.com/blog, Dec. 13, 2005.
H. Lee, “The Summary of RSS Industry Night Roundtable”, marketingloop.com/syndication, Dec. 14, 2005.
“RSS feeds with changing enclosure URLs”, www.kryogenix.org, Jul. 10, 2005.
“All About RSS”, www.faganfinder.com, Feb. 19, 2004.
“Definitions of rss on the Web”, www.google.com, Jan. 16, 2006.
“What is 2o7.net?”, www.omniture.com, no later than Jan. 16, 2006, copyright 1996-2005.
M. Arrington, “Is FeedBurner Pushing the Envelope on Trust?”, www.techcrunch.com, Dec. 7, 2005.
Statement from John W. Ogilvie, Sep. 28, 2006.
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,515 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,008 (2 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/759,079 (2 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/794,809 (3 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/993,397 (2 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/274,560 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,445 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,588 (4 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Petition to Make Special for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,588, May 17, 2006.
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,875 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,970 (4 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Petition to Make Special for U.S. Appl. No. 11/313,970, May 17, 2006.
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/319,337 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/341,231 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Forms for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,198 (2 sheets), (Sep. 28, 2006).
Form for PTO 1449 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,313 (1 sheet), (Sep. 28, 2006).
International Search Report for PCT/US04/39253, (Sep. 28, 2006).
International Search Report for PCT/US04/06898, (Sep. 28, 2006).
International Search Report for PCT/US04/06696, (Sep. 28, 2006).
Jason I. Hong et al., “WebQuilt: A Framework for Capturing and Visualizing the Web Experience”, guir.berkeley.edu, May 2001.
Jason I. Hong et al., “What Did They Do? Understanding Clickstreams with the WebQuilt Visualization System”, guir.berkeley.edu, (Sep. 28, 2006).
“Advertisement System, Method and Computer Program Product,” IP.com, Document ID IPCOM000138557D, Jul. 24, 2006.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Online syndicated content feed metrics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Online syndicated content feed metrics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Online syndicated content feed metrics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4053546

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.