Liquid purification or separation – Structural installation – Closed circulating system
Reexamination Certificate
2000-10-06
2003-08-12
Simmons, David A. (Department: 1724)
Liquid purification or separation
Structural installation
Closed circulating system
C210S232000, C210S275000, C210S279000, C210S289000, C210S416200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06605211
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to filters for removing contaminants from swimming pools.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Swimming pool sand filters typically include both a tank containing sand and an underdrain positioned at the bottom of the tank. The term “underdrain” denotes the apparatus which, when installed into the sand-filled tank, controls the transmission of the swimming pool water. The underdrain can perform either of two distinct functions depending on the direction of the water flow. If the water initially flows through the sand, and only subsequently into the underdrain, the system operates to filter contaminants from the water. Contaminants in the water are trapped in the sand as they flow towards the underdrain. The filtered water will then enter the underdrain and be returned to the swimming pool.
If the flow is reversed such that water from the pool is initially piped into the underdrain at the bottom of the sand-filled tank, and only then dispersed into the sand, the system operates to wash contaminants from the, sand. This type of operation is known as backwashing.
In order to maximize performance, the underdrain should function to force the water to flow through the largest possible portion of the sand so as to produce the greatest filtering action or, alternatively, so as to produce the greatest cleansing action.
Prior art underdrain designs as illustrated in
FIG. 1
typically consist of a central manifold
10
that directs the water to or from multiple lateral projections
20
that extend from the manifold
10
like the spokes on a wheel hub. The lateral projections
20
include small slots or perforations which permit the passage of water, but prevent the passage of sand
30
. Accordingly, the water is transferred to or from the sand
30
in a spoked pattern that roughly covers the area of the tank bottom.
Since the distribution pattern resembles radial spokes, the total flow of water at any radial distance from the manifold remains a constant. For example, if the total flow is 10 gal/min at 5″ from the center of the tank
40
, then the total flow at 8″ from the center of the tank
40
would also be 10 gal/min. However, since the circumference at 8″ is around 50.3″ and is 60% larger than the 31.4″ circumference at 5″, at the greater radial distance the same total flow is distributed over a significantly larger perimetral area.
This problem is accentuated during the backwashing operation. The high flow of water at the center of the tank
40
may form a tunnel through the sand, which will then draw even more water from the outside regions of the tank
40
to this path of least resistance.
FIG. 2
illustrates this possibility. The result leaves sand at the outside edge of the tank
40
virtually unwashed and consequently reduces the filtering capacity of the system. As a result, the user must backwash more often in order to maintain the filtering capacity at an acceptable level.
The spoked design also makes installation of the underdrain somewhat difficult. Since the spoked underdrain cannot fit through the tank opening in one piece, the laterals
20
usually have to be screwed into the manifold
10
after they are placed inside the tank
40
. This operation must typically be performed using only one hand that is inserted through a relatively narrow opening at the top of the tank
40
.
One prior art design utilizes hinged or pivoted connections between the lateral projections and the manifold, such that the complete assembly can be installed at one time. The installer then only has to reach into the tank to pivot the laterals downward into position. The problem with this design is that once installed, the hinges eventually become clogged with sand and lose functionality. Once this happens, the underdrain cannot be removed without damaging it.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an underdrain that both can be installed and/or removed in one piece, without any disassembly or hinge manipulation, and that distributes the water flow to the entire tank bottom area. The one-piece underdrain design according to the present invention addresses both performance and installation issues. Rather than lateral projections, the design primarily relies on a peripheral ring to transfer the water to the sand. The ends of the ring are not joined so that the ring is not closed. The ring is also bent into a helical shape which allows the ring to be screwed into an opening with a smaller diameter than that of the ring. As a result no assembly by the user is required in order to complete installation.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3011643 (1961-12-01), McCoy
patent: 3143500 (1964-08-01), Damgaard
patent: 3276588 (1966-10-01), Nehrbass et al.
patent: 3455458 (1969-07-01), Johnson
patent: 3625365 (1971-12-01), Armstrong et al.
patent: 3747768 (1973-07-01), Barrera
patent: 3770127 (1973-11-01), White
patent: 4105555 (1978-08-01), Pease
patent: 4200536 (1980-04-01), Kaufman
patent: 4478716 (1984-10-01), Hasegawa et al.
patent: 4657673 (1987-04-01), Kessler
patent: 4753726 (1988-06-01), Suchanek
patent: 4997558 (1991-03-01), Baker
patent: 5068033 (1991-11-01), Tobias et al.
patent: 6059967 (2000-05-01), Field
Jacuzzi Leisure Products
Lampe Thomas R.
Prince Fred
Simmons David A.
LandOfFree
One-piece underdrain for swimming pool filters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with One-piece underdrain for swimming pool filters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and One-piece underdrain for swimming pool filters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3104164