Land vehicles – Wheeled – Attachment
Reexamination Certificate
1999-04-19
2001-04-24
English, Peter C. (Department: 3619)
Land vehicles
Wheeled
Attachment
C180S272000, C701S045000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06220627
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL ART
The instant invention generally relates to occupant detection systems for controlling the activation of vehicular safety restraint systems and more particularly for determining the presence and position of an occupant for purposes of influencing the deployment of a safety restraint system responsive to a crash.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A vehicle may contain automatic safety restraint actuators that are activated responsive to a vehicle crash for purposes of mitigating occupant injury. Examples of such automatic safety restraint actuators include air bags, seat belt pretensioners, and deployable knee bolsters. One objective of an automatic restraint system is to mitigate occupant injury, thereby not causing more injury with the automatic restraint system than would be caused by the crash had the automatic restraint system not been activated. Generally, it is desirable to only activate automatic safety restraint actuators when needed to mitigate injury because of the expense of replacing the associated components of the safety restraint system, and because of the potential for such activations to harm occupants. This is particularly true of air bag restraint systems, wherein occupants too close to the air bag at the time of deployment—i.e. out-of-position occupants—are vulnerable to injury or death from the deploying air bag even when the associated vehicle crash is relatively mild. For example, unbelted occupants subjected to severe pre-impact braking are particularly vulnerable to being out-of-position at the time of deployment. Moreover, occupants who are of small stature or with weak constitution, such as children, small adults or people with frail bones are particularly vulnerable to injury induced by the air bag inflator. Furthermore, infants properly secured in a normally positioned rear facing infant seat (RFIS) in proximity to a front seat passenger-side air bag are also vulnerable to injury or death from the deploying air bag because of the close proximity of the infant seat's rear surface to the air bag inflator module.
Air bags can be beneficial to any forward facing occupant when that occupant is a significant distance from the inflator door. Air bags, however, can be lethal to infants in rear facing infant seats (RFIS). Air bags can also be hazardous to forward facing occupants if they are too close to the inflator at the time of vehicle impact, such as when an unbelted occupant is subjected to severe pre-impact breaking. Air bag inflators are designed with a given restraint capacity, as for example, the capacity to protect an unbelted normally seated fiftieth percentile occupant when subjected to a 30 MPH barrier equivalent crash, which results in associated energy and power levels which can be injurious to out-of-position occupants; to small or frail occupants such as children, small women, or elderly occupants; or to infants in rear facing infant seats (RFIS). While relatively infrequent, cases of injury or death caused by air bag inflators in crashes for which the occupants would have otherwise survived relatively unharmed have provided the impetus to reduce or eliminate the potential for air bag inflators to injure the occupants which they are intended to protect.
Automotive manufacturers and NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) are searching for methods to disable air bags in situations where they may cause more harm than good. Airbags have been developed to open with enough force to restrain a 175 lb. adult in a high velocity crash. When these air bags are deployed on children in the front passenger seat of a vehicle, they may cause serious injuries. Another potentially harmful situation is when the occupant is very close to the air bag inflator module at the time of air bag deployment. Recent NHTSA data suggests that severe injuries due to this close proximity with the inflator can be reduced or eliminated if the air bag is disabled when the occupant is closer than approximately four to ten inches from the inflator door. The region proximate to air bag inflator where the occupant could be at risk of injury from the air bag is called the “at-risk” zone. The size of the at-risk zone is dependent upon the inflation characteristics of the associated air bag inflator and the velocity of the occupant with respect to the air bag module. Previous studies had suggested that the at-risk zone extended about eight inches from the inflator door.
One technique for mitigating injury to occupants by the air bag inflator is to reduce the power and energy levels of the associated air bag inflator, for example by reducing the amount of gas generant in the air bag inflator, or the inflation rate thereof. This reduces the risk of harm to occupants by the air bag inflator while simultaneously reducing the restraint capacity of the air bag inflator, which places occupants at greater risk for injury when exposed to higher severity crashes.
Another technique for mitigating injury to occupants by the air bag inflator is to control the rate of inflation rate or the capacity of the inflator responsive to a measure of the severity of the crash. The prior art teaches the use of multi-stage inflators having distinct independent compartmentalized stages and corresponding firing circuits, whereby the stages may be fired in delayed succession to control the effective inflation rate, or stages may be inhibited from firing to control the effective inflator capacity. The prior art also teaches the use of a hybrid inflator having a combination of stored gas and plural pyrotechnic gas generator elements which are independently fired. Furthermore, the prior art also teaches the use of control valves for controlling the gaseous discharge flow from the inflator. The inflation rate and capacity may be controlled responsive to the sensed or estimated severity of the crash, whereby a low severity would require a lower inflation rate or inflation capacity than a high severity crash. Since lower severity crashes are more likely than those of higher severity, and since such a controlled inflator would likely be less aggressive under lower severity crash conditions than those of higher severity, occupants at risk of injury by the air bag inflator because of their size or position will be less likely to be injured overall because they are more likely to be exposed to a less aggressive inflator. However, the risk of injury to such occupants would not be mitigated under the conditions of higher crash severity when the inflator is intentionally made aggressive in order to provide sufficient restraint for normally positioned occupants.
Yet another technique for mitigating injury to occupants by the air bag inflator is to control the activation of the inflator responsive to the presence and position of the occupant, thereby activating the inflator only when an occupant is positioned outside the associated at-risk zone of the inflator. Recent NHTSA data suggests that severe injuries due to close proximity with the inflator can be reduced or eliminated if the air bag is disabled when the occupant is closer than approximately 4 to 10 inches from the inflator door. Such a system for disabling the air bag inflator requires a occupant sensor that is sufficiently sensitive and robust to make such a determination, while not causing the air bag inflator to be disabled when otherwise required for providing occupant restraint.
Except for some cases of oblique or side-impact crashes, it is generally desirable to not activate an automatic safety restraint actuator if an associated occupant is not present because of the otherwise unnecessary costs and inconveniences associated with the replacement of a deployed air bag inflation system. The prior art teaches various means for detecting the presence of an occupant, or the recognition of an inanimate object in the passenger-seat of a vehicle for purposes of implementing such a system. For example, weight sensors can incorporated into the seat to detect the presence of an occupant.
Yet another technique for mitigating injury to occupants
English Peter C.
Lyon P.C.
LandOfFree
Occupant detection system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Occupant detection system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Occupant detection system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2463977