Conveyors – chutes – skids – guides – and ways – Chutes – Vertical swing
Reexamination Certificate
1999-09-30
2001-04-17
Ellis, Christopher P. (Department: 3651)
Conveyors, chutes, skids, guides, and ways
Chutes
Vertical swing
C193S00200R, C193S022000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06216842
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to an apparatus used to transport, convey, or move various objects, such as packages and the like, from one location to another. More particularly, this invention relates to a liner for installation on surfaces on which objects are transported, conveyed or moved, and a method of installing such liner to such surface.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the package shipping industry, a package is processed for transshipment using a stationary chute along which the package is caused to be moved along by an external force, such as gravity. The chute may come in various sizes and shapes, such as an inclined slide with a stopper wall or horizontal plane at the bottom thereof, a spiral channel going from one floor to another, a circular angled flat surface, etc. The term “chute,” is defined elsewhere herein. Almost every package shipping and processing station has one or more chutes which are used in the processing of the packages.
The most troublesome problem in the package shipping industry has been the continual pile-up or build-up of the packages in the chutes. The packages inevitably tend to stick and/or bridge, and cause a back-up of the packages and a shut down of the conveying line. This problem may be caused most often by defective design of the chutes as well as by such factors as humidity (e.g. the packages are wet) and the condition and/or composition of the packages (e.g. “shrink wrapped” plastic coating). There is poor compatibility between the chute surface and the packages. But, due to cost and other considerations, there has been very little change in the structural design of the chutes. Thus, in the prior art, the problem of package build-up, bridging, sticking, backup, and the like, has been approached in an ad hoc manner as to solutions for such problem. Some of these approaches are as follows, none of which are satisfactory.
The most obvious solution and one which has been the most expensive has been for the operator to stop the transporting line, and then go to the chute location where there is bridging, etc, and using a pole or other ad hoc tool, knock the packages around until the back-up problem is solved. Unfortunately, many of the problems occur in hard to reach places. Thus, the human operator is often injured while trying to solve the problem. This increases considerably the Workman's Compensation rate, injury to the worker, and conveying line down time. Also, recent tightening of OSHA rules makes this solution outdated. In other words, this ad hoc solution is no longer feasible.
Also, when the packages are “wet” or “shrink wrapped”, the transport surface of the chute was sprayed or painted with graphite paint or paraffin wax partially diluted with water. However, this solution was not satisfactory because of the costs involved and because of the contamination caused to other packages and other parts of the conveying system, such as to moving conveyor belts which would become coated with the wax and/or graphite and require frequent and costly replacement. Also, this solution is really no solution since the wax and/or graphite would be effective at most for only a day or so because most of the coating would tend to stick to the packages and be taken away thereby. In this type of solution, we can also include use of oils and other similar material, which also have the same problem.
Another solution attempted in the prior art was covering the transport surface with a thick sheet (over ¼″) of UHMW (ultra high molecular weight) polyethylene. Although the polyethylene layer appears to be “slick”, in point of fact, it is inherently sticky in effect. The material tends to abrade in a manner similar to a sheet of plywood which may sliver and itself thereby cause packages to bridge and stick. Once abraded, the UHMW polyethylene layer's coefficient of friction and surface energy will begin to have an adverse effect on movement of the package placed on its surface. Also, disadvantageously, the process of applying this UHMW layer is time consuming because it must be cut, bevilled, drilled, and countersunk with screws. The cost of installation is thus almost prohibitive. Accordingly, this solution is not satisfactory.
A further solution was recently suggested, but was found to have too many disadvantages to be economically feasible. This was to make the chutes of molded fiber glass with a high build epoxy coating on the conveying surfaces. It was discovered that such chutes fractured easily, were difficult to repair, were of brittle material, and had inadequate release properties. Thus, rather than solve the problem of build up, this type of chute caused almost the same problem of build-up and accordingly, the problem was not solved satisfactorily.
In addition to the problems associated with the transport of objects in the package shipping industry, similar problems arise within food processing, manufacturing of trade goods, and other industries where it is necessary to transport objects along a transport surface.
In the food processing industry various raw materials are combined and prepared into a food product for shipment to a retail store. This processing requires the transport of objects from various locations within a facility, to a preparation area and then once prepared, to various locations to be shipped. Such a facility may have problems, in many locations, with the buildup of various types of objects. These types of problems have been addressed by lubricating the transport surface. The most common lubrication methods have been to grease and/or flour the transport surface. However, this solution requires the continual re-greasing and/or re-flouring of the transport surface as the lubricant is worn away. This increases cost in both materials and the time necessary to continually apply the lubricant.
Therefore, there exists a need for facilitating the transport of objects on a stationary transport surface, to prevent the continual build-up, bridging, or sticking of objects in a transport system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Thus there is a particular need for an apparatus which remedies the aforementioned deficiencies in the prior art. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a chute for conveying an object comprises a stationary transport substrate and a liner in sheet form with a non-stick coating, which liner is securable to the stationary transport substrate. The liner may be mechanically secured to the stationary transport substrate or an adhesive may be used to bond the liner to the stationary transport substrate. The liner may comprise a fabric coated with a non-stick coating, a laminate comprised of multiple non-stick coated fabric layers, or a laminate comprised of multiple non-stick coated fabric layers having on one side a conductive material which can dissipate electrical charges. The liner may be secured to the entire stationary transport substrate, or only identified portions of the substrate where objects may block the transport of other objects.
This construction has a number of advantages over the prior art. The non-stick liner facilitates the movement of objects on a stationary transport substrate, substantially eliminating build-up, bridging, or sticking of objects in the transport system. The non-stick coated fabric and fabric laminate provide increased wear resistance for heavy flow areas, relieving the continual need to reapply a lubricant to the transport substrate. The identification of areas within the transport system, where objects may build-up, bridge, or stick, and targeting of only those areas for lining greatly reduces the costs involved for improving the transport system.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3566501 (1971-03-01), Winchester
patent: 3598460 (1971-08-01), Conrath
patent: 3787281 (1974-01-01), Effenberger
patent: 4054194 (1977-10-01), Davis
patent: 4234182 (1980-11-01), Camilleri
patent: 5230937 (1993-07-01), Effenberger et al.
patent: 36 33 036 A1 (1988-03-01), None
patent: 39 05 343 A1 (1990-08-01), None
patent: 42 19 636 A1 (1993-12
Beale Scott Andrew
Ritter James Michael
Crawford Gene O.
Ellis Christopher P.
Heslin & Rothenberg, P.C.
Tonoga Limited
LandOfFree
Object conveying surface with liner and method of applying... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Object conveying surface with liner and method of applying..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Object conveying surface with liner and method of applying... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2525363