Non-toxic endophytes, plants injected therewith and methods...

Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Plant – seedling – plant seed – or plant part – per se – Higher plant – seedling – plant seed – or plant part

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C800S295000, C424S093500, C435S911000, C435S243000, C435S254100, C435S256400, C435S041000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07465855

ABSTRACT:
A grass with improved environmental stress tolerance and low animal toxicity is disclosed where the grass is infected with an isolated endophyte selected from the groups consisting of USDA-PI no. 269850, Ijoukak, Morocco 92060, Boumalne-de-Dades, Morocco KBG 5921, USDA-PI no. 516560, Oujda, Morocco KBG 5892, and mixtures and combinations thereof. A method for stably infecting the grasses is also disclosed.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6072107 (2000-06-01), Latch et al.
patent: 6111170 (2000-08-01), Latch et al.
patent: 6335188 (2002-01-01), Schardl et al.
patent: 6548745 (2003-04-01), Hiruma et al.
West et al. 1998.Molecular and Cellular Technologies for Forage Improvement, pp. 105-115).
Latch, GCM and Christensen, MJ. 1985. Artificial infection of grasses with endophytes. Annals of Applied Biology [Ann. Appl. Biol.]. vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 17-24.
Bouton, J.H. et al., “Infection of tall fescue cultivars with non-toxic endophytes,” Proceedings of the 55th Southern Pasture and Forage Crop Improvement Conference, Raleigh, NC (Jun. 12-14, 2000) 6 pages.
Bouton, J.H. et al., “Tall fescue cultivars infected with non-toxic endophytes,” American Forage and Grassland Council (Jul. 2000) 125-129.
Butler, J.M. et al., “Forensic DNA typing by capillary electrophoresis using the ABI Prism 310 and 3100 genetic analyzers for STR analysis,” Electrophoresis (2004) 25:1397-1412.
Crawford Jr., R.J. et al., “Evaluation of a nontoxic endophyte in ‘HiMag’ tall fescue,” Southwest Missouri Agricultural Research and Education Center, 2001 Research Report, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri (2001) 6-7.
Davison, A. et al., “Laboratory temperature variation is a previously unrecognized source of genotyping error during capillary electrophoresis,” Molecular Ecology Notes (2003) 3:321-323.
Roberts, C. et al., “Steer performance from tall fescue infected with beneficial endophytes,” Missouri Grasslands, Newsletter of the Missouri Forage and Grassland Council (Summer, 2000) 11(2):2 pages.
Schardl, C.L. et al., “Three new species of Epichloe symbiotic with North American grasses,” Mycologia (1999) 91 (1):95-107.
West, C.P. et al., “Novel endophyte technology: selection of the fungus,” Crop Science Society of America Special Publication No. 26 (1998) 105-115.
Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Joplin Division,Pennington Seed, Inc: et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299, Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-WAK.
First Amended Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Joplin Division,Pennington Seed, Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299, Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-WAK.
Order Granting University of Arkansas' Motion to Dismiss, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Central Division,Pennington Seed Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299 et al., Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-SOW (Nov. 29, 2004).
Order Dismissing Defendants FFR Cooperative, Allied Seed, and Produce Exchange No. 299, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Central Division,Pennington Seed Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299 et al., Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-SOW (May, 31, 2005).
Order Granting Defendants Gary C. George, B. Alan Sugg, John A. White, and Charles P. West's Motion to Dismiss, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Central Division,Pennington Seed Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299 et al., Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-SOW (Jun. 1, 2005).
Entry of Final Judgment, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Central Division,Pennington Seed Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299 et al., Case No. 04-4194-CV-C-SOW (Jun. 1, 2005).
U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit Opinion,Pennington Seed, Inc. et al.v.Produce Exchange No. 299 et al., 457 F.3d 1334; 2006 U.S. App. Lexis 20363; 79 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1777.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Non-toxic endophytes, plants injected therewith and methods... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Non-toxic endophytes, plants injected therewith and methods..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Non-toxic endophytes, plants injected therewith and methods... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4051115

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.