Spring devices – Resilient shock or vibration absorber – Nonmetallic – resilient element
Reexamination Certificate
2002-02-13
2004-06-29
Rodriguez, Pam (Department: 3683)
Spring devices
Resilient shock or vibration absorber
Nonmetallic, resilient element
C267S140120, C267S152000, C280S124106
Reexamination Certificate
active
06755403
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to stabilizer bar bushings. More particularly, the present invention relates to a stabilizer bar bushing which incorporates anti-slip features to eliminate slip between the bushing and the stabilizer bar.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Conventional motor vehicle suspension systems often include one or more stabilizer bars to control the degree of roll of the motor vehicle during cornering or other vehicle maneuvers. A typical stabilizer bar is generally U-shaped having a long intermediate portion disposed laterally with respect to the motor vehicle and a pair of relatively short end portions extending forwardly or rearwardly to connect to a corresponding pair of suspension arms or wheel hubs. The intermediate portion normally is connected to the underside of the vehicle by one or more bracket assemblies.
The mounting bracket assembly for the intermediate portion of the stabilizer bar typically includes an elastomeric bushing, sometimes termed an insulator, and a bracket which is secured to the underside of the vehicle. The elastomeric bushing is located between the stabilizer bar and the bracket to support and isolate the stabilizer bar. In some applications it is desirable to use an elastomeric bushing that permits the stabilizer bar to rotate freely about the axis of the intermediate portion of the stabilizer bar. In other applications, it is desirable to allow partial wind-up of the bushing and then allowing the bushing to slip for relative torsional travel between the bushing and the bar. In still other applications, attempts are made to eliminate the slippage of the bushing such that all rotation of the stabilizer bar is resisted by wind-up of the bushing.
The designs that allow rotation between the bar and the bushing have attempted to minimize friction at the bushing/stabilizer bar interface by employing low-friction materials as liners covering the bore of the bushing or by adding lubricants between the bushing and the stabilizer bar. Commonly used materials for bushing liners are polyester or polytetra fluoroethylene while silicone greases have been utilized as lubricants. The primary disadvantage of these designs is that the liner wears or the lubricant dissipates resulting in an unacceptable audible squawk in the vehicle. Also, with these designs, environmental contamination can result in premature wear of the liner or premature dissipation of the lubricant thus leading to the audible squawk.
The designs that allow partial wind-up and then allow slippage of the stabilizer bar with respect to the bushing suffer from the same disadvantages as the designs that allow total rotation in that early wear and/or contamination of the interface between the bar and the bushing can lead to an audible squawk.
The designs that attempt to eliminate all slippage of the bushing have been successful for limited rotation of the stabilizer bar with respect to the bushing, but larger rotation of the stabilizer bar has caused deterioration of the bushing and/or slippage of the bushing. In order to overcome these problems, some prior art designs have incorporated flats on the stabilizer bar or other components which resist rotation of the bushing. While the incorporation of flats has resisted the larger amounts of rotation, the costs and complexities of these designs have limited their applicability.
The continued development of stabilizer bar bushings and attachment systems has been directed toward designs which provide additional durability, eliminate the audible squawking by eliminating the rotation between the stabilizer bar and the bushing but yet still perform the required isolation between the stabilizer bar and the vehicle.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides the art with an attachment between the stabilizer bar and the supporting structure of the vehicle which will improve the durability of the bushing, provide isolation for the stabilizer bar and allow for the proper positioning of the stabilizer bar relative to the frame. The present invention provides for radial, axial, torsional and conical loading of the stabilizer bar due to jounce and rebound of the suspension. The present invention provides this relative movement between the stabilizer bar and the frame without slippage between the bushing and the stabilizer bar thus eliminating the potential for an audible squawk.
The present invention utilizes a mechanically bonded bushing assembled over the stabilizer bar and then compressed into an outer sleeve/bracket assembly. The bracket assembly is provided with slotted holes to compensate for the stabilizer bar assembly and the vehicle body tolerance stack-ups. This preassembly of the bushings and the stabilizer bar also allows the assembly to be supplied directly to the assembly plants ready for vehicle assembly. This is opposed to the prior art which supplies the stabilizer bar and the bushings as separate components requiring sub-assembly at the vehicle assembly plant. The stabilizer bar attachment of the present invention provides both axial and lateral location proximate to the vehicle body and suspension attachments, the torsional resistance of the elastomeric member provides enhanced anti-roll capabilities, and due to the lack of slippage between the elastomeric member and the bore, a noise free pivot attachment with enhanced longevity and product life is provided.
Other advantages and objects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the subsequent detailed description, appended claims and drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1552645 (1925-09-01), Powell
patent: RE17136 (1928-11-01), Harris
patent: 1827267 (1931-10-01), Short
patent: 1983796 (1934-12-01), Geyer
patent: 3230000 (1966-01-01), Simpson
patent: 3392971 (1968-07-01), Herbenar et al.
patent: 3572677 (1971-03-01), Damon
patent: 3642268 (1972-02-01), Hipsher
patent: 4377216 (1983-03-01), Ueno
patent: 4513990 (1985-04-01), Morita et al.
patent: 4700934 (1987-10-01), Andra et al.
patent: 4786036 (1988-11-01), Kanda
patent: 4834351 (1989-05-01), Firma Carl Freudenberg et al.
patent: 4854561 (1989-08-01), Kanda
patent: 4858899 (1989-08-01), Saotome et al.
patent: 4883287 (1989-11-01), Murakami et al.
patent: 4916749 (1990-04-01), Urban et al.
patent: 4927122 (1990-05-01), Brumme et al.
patent: 5005810 (1991-04-01), Sawada et al.
patent: 5013012 (1991-05-01), Jouade
patent: 5172893 (1992-12-01), Bouhier et al.
patent: 5188346 (1993-02-01), Hamada et al.
patent: 5280885 (1994-01-01), Noguchi
patent: 5288059 (1994-02-01), Gautheron et al.
patent: 5328160 (1994-07-01), McLaughlin
patent: 5397112 (1995-03-01), Roth et al.
patent: 5743987 (1998-04-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5879026 (1999-03-01), Dostert et al.
Lewis James
Missig Robert
Novy Richard
Harness Dickey & Pierce PLC
Rodriguez Pam
The Pullman Company
LandOfFree
Non-slip sta-bar bushing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Non-slip sta-bar bushing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Non-slip sta-bar bushing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3297098