Non-KSU message delivery system

Telephonic communications – Special services – Locating using diverse technology

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C379S156000, C379S159000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06636595

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a non-KSU (“key service unit”) telephone apparatus, and more particularly to a non-KSU telephone apparatus and its method of operation within a non-KSU telephone system, which includes message recording in response to a transferred call, distributed message taking, and distribution and storage of CPID (calling party identification) information.
2. Background Information
Often small businesses and home offices that have multiple telephone lines simply connect individual telephone units and corresponding extensions to separate telephone lines. Generally, these consumers would find it advantageous to have the appearance of a larger organization. If the small business/home office experiences an increased volume of telephone traffic, one way of handling the increased volume is to upgrade the telephone system. Unfortunately, a telephone system such as a PBX system would be an impractical solution since avoiding major capital investments and service costs are important considerations for a small business/home office. A key telephone system obviates the need for a PBX system and attendant switchboard operators, since each telephone in the system is connected by a cable to a central control box referred to as a “key service unit” (KSU). However, the necessity of special cabling complicates installation and creates difficult service problems should a break develop in one or more of the cables, or if the KSU itself should fail.
A distributed telephone system (one that does not require a central control box, e.g. no KSU required) which provides subscribers with system-wide features such as intercom and call transferring are known as “non-KSU” or “KSU-less” systems. These non-KSU systems are capable of significantly enhancing business efficiency and customer service in a cost-effective manner. However, the non-KSU systems do not include features that are found in KSU systems. For example, while call-transferring permits a person located at one station to manually transfer an incoming call to a person at a second station, traditional non-KSU systems are not able to transfer the incoming call from the first station and allow the incoming caller to record a message into a voice mailbox at the second station. In addition, non-KSU systems are not known to be able to be automatically answered (without human intervention) at one station and then allow the incoming caller to direct the call to a particular station within the system.
Furthermore, non-KSU systems are not known to have a decentralized answering system such that each station has its own telephone answering device. Generally, the cost of a centralized voice mail system varies depending on the number of stations the voice mail system is capable of handling. That is, a centralized voice mail system capable of handling 12 stations is generally more expensive than a centralized voice mail system only capable of handling three stations. Therefore, if the user only requires 2-3 stations as he is starting out, but he purchased a system capable of handling 12 stations, the cost of voice mail for these two or three stations would be accordingly more expensive. In addition, in centralized voice mail systems, users retrieve their messages by physically going to or dialing into a central station. It would be advantageous to have a non-KSU system with a distributed voice mail system in which each station is equipped with voice mail capabilities. Since the cost per station of a distributed voice mail system would remain constant, a user could start off with a small system and expand his telephone system as necessary. In addition, the user would have the ability to retrieve voice mail intended for a particular station, directly at that station without having to dial into a central station. Due to the lack of a distributed voice mail system, non-KSU systems are not known to associate calling party identification (CPID) information with their respective voice messages at the station to which the incoming call has been transferred.
There is also a need for a logical scheme for distributing and storing calling party identification (CPID) information. Generally all stations within a non-KSU system have access to all of the telephone lines. If the non-KSU system is capable of handling CPID information, every station would receive whatever CPID information is transmitted over every telephone line. In a known system, there are two settings which determine how CPID information is stored. Each station is set to either 1) store all the CPID information received over the connected telephone lines, regardless of whether it was intended for that station; or 2) only store the CPID information if the call is manually answered at that station. If the station is set for the second option and no one is there to answer the call, the CPID information is lost. It would be advantageous for CPID information to be stored at a directed station even if no one is there to answer the call at that moment. The first option provided by Nortel, whereby a station stores CPID information for every incoming call, would create information overload, thereby rendering the system extremely inefficient.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an enhanced, cost-effective, and expandable non-KSU system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system in which any station within the non-KSU system may be chosen to automatically answer incoming calls.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system which prevents more than one station from automatically answering incoming calls.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system that allows for distributed recording of voice messages.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system that allows transferred calls to be answered by a station's voice mail.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system in which the cost per station of having voice mail remains constant.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system that stores an incoming call's calling party identification (CPID) information at a station if the incoming call is manually or automatically answered by that station.
It is still yet another object of the present invention to provide a non-KSU system that associates an incoming call's CPID information with the respective voice message following the transfer of the incoming call to a destination station.
It is still yet a further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus that operates within a non-KSU system such that the apparatus may be selectively chosen to automatically answer incoming calls.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus that operates within a non-KSU system such that the apparatus has an integrated telephone answering machine.
It is further object of the present invention to provide an apparatus that operates within a non-KSU system such that the apparatus' telephone answering device functionality is activated by signals other than central office (CO) ring signals.
In accordance with one form of the present invention, a non-key service unit (non-KSU) telephone apparatus for use with a plurality of telephones includes a line interface having an input operatively coupled to the plurality of telephone lines. The line interface also includes a plurality of outputs.
The non-KSU also includes a microcontroller operatively coupled to the line interface, a first multiplexer operatively coupled to the microcontroller and at least a portion of the plurality of outputs of the line interface, wherein the first multiplexer multiplexes transmit and receive audio signals for the plurality of telephone lines. The non-KSU also includes a coder/decoder coupled to the first multiplexer wherein the microcontroller instructs the first multiplexer to couple

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Non-KSU message delivery system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Non-KSU message delivery system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Non-KSU message delivery system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3166136

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.