Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Method of using a plant or plant part in a breeding process... – Breeding for altered fat – fatty oil – ester-type wax – or...
Reexamination Certificate
2007-07-03
2007-07-03
Mehta, Ashwin (Department: 1638)
Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and
Method of using a plant or plant part in a breeding process...
Breeding for altered fat, fatty oil, ester-type wax, or...
Reexamination Certificate
active
10869422
ABSTRACT:
A non-hydrogenated canola oil having superior oxidative stability and fry stability useful for food applications is disclosed, as well as seeds, plant lines and progeny thereof from which the oil is derived.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4627192 (1986-12-01), Fick
patent: 5260077 (1993-11-01), Carrick et al.
patent: 5767338 (1998-06-01), Fan
patent: 5965755 (1999-10-01), Sernyk et al.
patent: 5969169 (1999-10-01), Fan
patent: 6169190 (2001-01-01), Lanuza et al.
patent: 6201145 (2001-03-01), Fan
patent: 6407317 (2002-06-01), Fan
patent: 0 323 753 (1989-07-01), None
patent: WO 90/10380 (1990-09-01), None
patent: WO 91/15578 (1991-10-01), None
patent: WO 92/03919 (1992-03-01), None
patent: WO 93/06714 (1993-04-01), None
patent: WO 93/17566 (1993-09-01), None
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Cantra Foods, Ltd.et al United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Order Re Motion For Judgment That '169 and '145 Patents Are Unenforceable For Cargill's Inequitable Conduct, Dec. 20, 2005, 7 pages.
Warner et al., “Effects of Frying Oil Composition on Potato Chip Stability,”J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1994, 71(10):1117-1121.
Warner and Mounts, “Frying Stability of Soybean and Canola Oils with Modified Fatty Acid Compositions,”J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1993, 70(10):983-988.
ATCC Accession No. 40409.
ATCC Accession No. 40523.
ATCC Accession No. 40524.
A.O.C.S. Official Method Cd 12-57, “Fat Stability,” pp. 1-4, 1989.
A.O.C.S. Recommended Practice Cg 2-83, “Flavor Panel Evaluation of Vegetable Oils,” pp. 1-3, 1989.
Auld et al., “Rapeseed Mutants with Reduced LevEls of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Increased Levels of Oleic Acid,”Crop Science, 1992, 32(3):657-662.
Boyeldieu, “Produire des grains oléagineux et protéagineaux,”Lavoisier Tec.&Doc., 1991, Chapter II, pp. 17-65.
deMan et al., “Formation of Short Chain Volatile Organic Acids in the Automated AOM Method,”JAOCS, 1987, 64(7):993-996.
Eskin et al., “Stability and Low Linolenic Acid Canola Oil to Frying Temperatures,”JAOCS, 1989, 66(8):1081-1084.
Karleskind et al., “Méthodes d'évaluation de la résistance á l'oxydation,”Lavoisier Tec.&Doc., 1992, pp. 1212-1215.
Kirk-Othmer, “Fats and fatty oils,”Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 1978, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 795-831.
Laubli et al., “Determination of the Oxidative Stability of Fats and Oils: Comparision between the Active Oxygen Method (AOCS Cd 12-57) and the Rancimat Method,”JAOCS, 1986, 63(6):792-795.
Morrison III et al., “Hydrogenated Sunflowerseed Oil: Oxidative Stability and Polymer Formationon Heating,”JAOCS, 1978, 55:451-453.
Mounts, “Odor Considerations in the Use of Frying Oils,”JAOCS, 1979, 56:659-663.
Mounts, “Evaluation of Finished Oil Quality,”Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, 1980, Ch. 15, pp. 245-266.
Mounts et al., “Effect of Altered Fatty Acid Composition on Soybean Oil Stability,”JAOCS, 1988, 65(4):624-628.
Neff et al., Paper: “Oxidative Stabilities of Oils from Selected Canola Varieties,” 84thAmerican Oil Chemists' Society Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, Apr. 24-29, 1993 (Abstract).
Nitsch, “Genetische und physiologische Untersuchungen an Polyenfettsäure-Mutanten von Raps. II. Entwicklung und Polyenfettsäuregehalt von reifenden Samen,”Angew. Bokanik, 1976, 50:31-42.
Prevot et al., “A New Variety of Low-Linolenic Rapeseed Oil; Characteristics and Room-Odor Tests,”JAOCS, 1990, 67(3):161-164.
Purdy, “Oxidative Stability of High Oleic Sunflower and Safflower Oils,”JAOCS, 1985, 61:523-525.
Rakow, “Selektion auf Linol-und Linolensäuregehalt in Rapssamen nach mutagener Behandlung,”Z. Pflanznzuch, 1973, 69:62-82.
Scarth et al. “Stellar Low Linolenic-High Linoleic Acid Summer Rape,”Can J. Plant Sci., 1988, 68:509-511.
Shpota, “Rape and Mustard Breeding for Oil Quality,” International Rapeseed Congress, May 1987, pp. 561-565.
Swern (ed.),Bailey's Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 1982, 4thEdition, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 452.
Warner et al., “Flavor and Oxidative Stability of Soybean, Sunflower and Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed Oils,”JAOCS, 1989, 66(4):558-564.
White et al., “Oxidative Stabilities of Low-Linolenate, High-Stearate and Common Soybean Oils,”JAOCS, 1988, 65(8):1334-1338.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, Apr. 18, 2005, 2 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Cargill's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, Apr. 18, 2005, 31 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Declaration of Chad A. Hanson in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Apr. 18, 2005, 7 pages with Exhibits A-KK, 197 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Declaration of John R. Powell, Ph.D., Apr. 15, 2005, 5 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Declaration of Michael Eskin, Ph.D., Apr. 15, 2005, 3 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Plaintiff's Concise Statement of Material Facts, Apr. 18, 2005, 4 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, May 2, 2005, 40 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Declaration of Gord Misener, May 2, 2005, 5 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al, United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Declaration of Dr. Fereidoon Shahidi, Apr. 30, 2005, 5 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1290-MO, Declaration of Scott A. Spencer in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment of Infringement, May 2, 2005, 7 pages with 75 Exhibits, 210 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Concise Statement of Material Facts, May 2, 2005, 15 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Plaintiff Cargill's Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, May 9, 2005, 40 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Reply Declaration of Chad A. Hanson in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, May 9, 2005, 7 pages with 50 exhibits totaling 251 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Plaintiff Cargill's Concise Statement Replying to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Concise Statement of Material Facts In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement, May 9, 2005, 37 pages.
Cargill, Incorporatedv.Canbra Foods, Ltd.et al., United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 03-1209-MO, Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That Claims 1, 6, 7 and 10 of the ′169 Patent and
Cargill Incorporated
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Mehta Ashwin
Zheng Li
LandOfFree
Non-hydrogenated canola oil for food applications does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Non-hydrogenated canola oil for food applications, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Non-hydrogenated canola oil for food applications will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3731752