Joints and connections – Rod end to transverse side of member – Corner joint
Reexamination Certificate
2000-05-03
2001-09-04
Stephan, Beth A. (Department: 3635)
Joints and connections
Rod end to transverse side of member
Corner joint
C403S382000, C403S402000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06283668
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to joints for joining structural members, primarily those structural members made of wood.
2. Description of the Related Art
Wood is widely known to be an excellent building material. Compared to other building materials like steel and concrete, wood is is strong but light; machinable and durable; inexpensive and can be used for building by anyone who has access to the simplest of tools. It is therefore widely used to construct our houses and furniture.
Because wood is so widely used, the joints used in connecting structural members together are very important. Some of the most common joints are made by simply abutting the end of one structural member to the other. This type of joint requires other hardware—like nails, dowels or brackets—to hold them together. This is perhaps the most common type of joint used in home building and furniture making.
Another type of joint is formed by chamfering the ends of structural member, and securing them together somehow. Typically, the ends have to be glued or nailed together, or both. This is a common type of joint used in picture frames. The problem with this type of joint is that it does not withstand shear forces very well, and any force on the structure will impart shear forces on the joint. Glued joints of this type are weak, since glue does not withstand shear forces well. Nailed joints would tend to separate.
One solution that has been tried in the past is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,684,282, by Lever, that is not admitted to be prior art by its inclusion in this Background section. Lever discloses an interlocking joint with a mortise and tenon. However, the members are chamfered, and therefore result in shear stresses on the joint whenever force is put on the structure. This would tend to separate the members, and forms a relatively weak joint.
Another solution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,848,852, by Shpigel, that is also not admitted to be prior art by its inclusion in this Background section. Shpigel discloses a strong joint, but one that is very complex to manufacture. He also requires addition hardware, like screws, in order to assemble the joint.
What is needed, therefore, and has not been found in the prior art is a joint in which shear force is not carried by glue; does not require extra hardware like inserts, dowels, screws, or brackets; is easy to produce with ordinary tools; and will accommodate either two or three structural members.
SUMMARY
The present invention is directed to a joint that satisfies these needs. A joint having the features of the present invention comprises a mortise and at least one tenon, wherein the mortise in a first structural member is defined by at least one V-shaped groove portion of a given width terminating in two opposing face portions that are perpendicular to the mating surfaces of the first structural member, and the tenons in other structural members are defined by V-shaped projection portions of a given width terminating in two opposing face portions parallel to a mating edge of the other structural members. These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description and accompanying drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 589836 (1897-09-01), Koll
patent: 1924240 (1933-08-01), Harwell
patent: 2263198 (1941-11-01), Valiton
patent: 2607311 (1952-08-01), Doan
patent: 4008553 (1977-02-01), Oliver
patent: 4261148 (1981-04-01), Scott
patent: 4287694 (1981-09-01), Cornell
patent: 4324445 (1982-04-01), Schaefer
patent: 4383780 (1983-05-01), Davison
patent: 4624295 (1986-11-01), Howland
patent: 4684282 (1987-08-01), Lever
patent: 5103610 (1992-04-01), Walters
patent: 5553967 (1996-09-01), Uozumi
patent: 5560409 (1996-10-01), Knorr
patent: 5733024 (1998-03-01), Slocum et al.
patent: 5848852 (1998-12-01), Shpigel
patent: 5899251 (1999-05-01), Turner
patent: 5983583 (1999-11-01), Mattix
patent: 6033326 (2000-03-01), Lee
patent: 6045290 (2000-04-01), Noclevski
patent: 6098365 (2000-08-01), Martin
patent: 6132129 (2000-10-01), Frazler
patent: 3333-623 (1985-04-01), None
Decker Phillip E.
Norek Technical Resources, Inc.
Stephan Beth A.
LandOfFree
No-slip corner joint does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with No-slip corner joint, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and No-slip corner joint will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2440415