Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Sensitivity to electric stimulus
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-08
2002-12-31
Schaetzle, Kennedy (Department: 3762)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Sensitivity to electric stimulus
C600S546000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06500128
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to nerve monitoring systems, and more particularly to relative nerve movement and status detection methods and systems.
2. Description of Related Art
Systems and methods exist for monitoring a nerve. One such system determines when a stimulating needle is approaching a nerve. The system applies a current to the needle to evoke a muscular response. The muscular response is visually monitored (typically as a shake or “twitch”). When the user observes such a muscular response, the needle is considered to be near the nerve coupled to the responsive muscle. These systems require the user to observe the muscular response (to determine that the needle has approached the nerve). This may be difficult depending on the competing tasks of the user. In addition, when general anesthesia is used during a procedure, muscular response may be suppressed, limiting the ability of a user to detect the response.
Accordingly, a need exists for a better system and method that can determine the movement and status of nerves.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention includes a method and system for determining the status of a nerve and relative movement between a nerve and a conductive device. The present includes a method for determining relative movement between a nerve and a second conductive element. The method includes applying a first electrical signal to a first conductive element. The first conductive element is located at a position where the distance between the first conductive element and the nerve is relatively constant. The first electrical signal has an energy level that induces a predetermined nerve response. The method also applies a second electrical signal to the second conductive element. The second electrical signal has an energy level that induces the predetermined nerve response. Then the method applies a third electrical signal to the second conductive element. The third electrical signal has an energy level that induces the predetermined nerve response. When the current level of the third electrical signal is not substantially equal to the current level of the second electrical signal, the method applies a fourth electrical signal to the first conductive element. The fourth electrical signal has an energy level that induces the predetermined nerve response. Then, the method determines that relative movement between the nerve and the second conductive element has occurred when the energy level of the first electrical signal is substantially equal to the current level of the fourth electrical signal.
The method may further include placing a first conductive element at a position where the distance between the first conductive element and the nerve is relatively constant. The first electrical signal may have a current level that induces the predetermined nerve response. Further, the nerve response may be determined from at least one EMG measured at a muscle physiologically coupled to the nerve. The method may also include determining that the nerve status has changed when the energy level of the first electrical signal is not substantially equal to the energy level of the fourth electrical signal.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2704064 (1955-03-01), Fizzell et al.
patent: 3364929 (1968-01-01), Ide et al.
patent: 3664329 (1972-05-01), Naylor
patent: 3682162 (1972-08-01), Colyer
patent: 3830226 (1974-08-01), Staub et al.
patent: 3957036 (1976-05-01), Normann
patent: 4099519 (1978-07-01), Warren
patent: 4207897 (1980-06-01), Lloyd et al.
patent: 4224949 (1980-09-01), Scott et al.
patent: 4235242 (1980-11-01), Howson et al.
patent: 4285347 (1981-08-01), Hess
patent: 4291705 (1981-09-01), Severinghaus et al.
patent: 4515168 (1985-05-01), Chester et al.
patent: 4519403 (1985-05-01), Dickhudt
patent: 4545374 (1985-10-01), Jacobson
patent: 4592369 (1986-06-01), Davis et al.
patent: 4595018 (1986-06-01), Rantala
patent: 4633889 (1987-01-01), Talalla et al.
patent: 4658835 (1987-04-01), Pohndorf
patent: 4744371 (1988-05-01), Harris
patent: 4759377 (1988-07-01), Dykstra
patent: 4807642 (1989-02-01), Brown
patent: 4892105 (1990-01-01), Prass
patent: 4926865 (1990-05-01), Oman
patent: 4962766 (1990-10-01), Herzon
patent: 4964411 (1990-10-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5007902 (1991-04-01), Witt
patent: 5058602 (1991-10-01), Brody
patent: 5081990 (1992-01-01), Deletis
patent: 5092344 (1992-03-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5127403 (1992-07-01), Brownlee
patent: 5161533 (1992-11-01), Prass et al.
patent: RE34390 (1993-09-01), Culver
patent: 5255691 (1993-10-01), Otten
patent: 5282468 (1994-02-01), Klepinski
patent: 5284153 (1994-02-01), Raymond et al.
patent: 5284154 (1994-02-01), Raymond et al.
patent: 5313956 (1994-05-01), Knutsson et al.
patent: 5327902 (1994-07-01), Lemmen
patent: 5333618 (1994-08-01), Lekhtman et al.
patent: 5375067 (1994-12-01), Berchin
patent: 5482038 (1996-01-01), Ruff
patent: 5540235 (1996-07-01), Wilson
patent: 5549656 (1996-08-01), Reiss
patent: 5560372 (1996-10-01), Cory
patent: 5566678 (1996-10-01), Cadwell
patent: 5579781 (1996-12-01), Cooke
patent: 5593429 (1997-01-01), Ruff
patent: 5630813 (1997-05-01), Kieturakis
patent: 5671752 (1997-09-01), Sinderby et al.
patent: 5711307 (1998-01-01), Smits
patent: 5775331 (1998-07-01), Raymond et al.
patent: 5779642 (1998-07-01), Nightengale
patent: 5797854 (1998-08-01), Hedgecock
patent: 5830151 (1998-11-01), Hadzic et al.
patent: 5851191 (1998-12-01), Gozani
patent: 5853373 (1998-12-01), Griffith et al.
patent: 5885219 (1999-03-01), Nightengale
patent: 5888196 (1999-03-01), Bonutti
patent: 5928158 (1999-07-01), Aristides
patent: 5976094 (1999-11-01), Gozani
patent: 6004262 (1999-12-01), Putz et al.
patent: 6038477 (2000-03-01), Kayyali
patent: 6050992 (2000-04-01), Nicholas
patent: 6132386 (2000-10-01), Gozani et al.
patent: 6132387 (2000-10-01), Gozani et al.
patent: 6146335 (2000-11-01), Gozani
patent: 6161047 (2000-12-01), King et al.
patent: 6224549 (2001-05-01), Drongelen
patent: 6259945 (2001-07-01), Epstein et al.
patent: 6266558 (2001-07-01), Gozani et al.
patent: Wo 00/66217 (2000-11-01), None
Ford et al., ‘Electrical Characteristics of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators Implications for Nerve Localization’ Regional Anesthesia (1984) 9:73-77.
Greenblatt et al., Needle Nerve Simulator-Locator; Nerve Blocks with a New Instrument for Locating Nerves Anesthesia & Analgesia (1962) 41 (5):599-602.
Martin et al., “Initiation of Erection and Semen Release by Rectal Probe Electrostimulation (RPE)”The Williams&Wilkins Co.(1983) pp.637-642.
Pither et al., “The Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia; Review of Experimental Charactersitics, Technique, and Clinical Applications” Regional Anesthesia (19850 10:47-53.
Raj et al., “Infraclavicular Bracjial Plexus Block—A New Approach” Anesthesia and Analgesia (1973) 52(6);897-.
Raj et al., Use of the Nerve Stimulators for Regional Anesthesia Clinical Issues in Regional Anesthesia (198501(40; 1-6.
Raj et al., “Use of Nerve Stimulators for Peripheral Blocks” Regional Anesthesia Apr.-Jun. 1980 pp. 14-21.
Raymond et al., The Nerve Seeker: A system for automated nerve localization Regional Anesthesia (1992) 17(30;151-162.
Shafik, “Cavernous Nerve Stimulation Through an Extrapelvic Subpubic Approach: Role in Penile Erection” Eur. Urol.(1994)26;98-102.
Droesch Kristen
NuVasive, Inc.
Schaetzle Kennedy
Stangler Jonathan
LandOfFree
Nerve movement and status detection system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Nerve movement and status detection system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Nerve movement and status detection system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2931864