Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-28
2003-05-06
Isabella, David J. (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
C623S020140
Reexamination Certificate
active
06558426
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to orthopedic surgery and, in particular, to a posterior stabilized knee prosthesis.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In total knee-replacement (TKR) surgery, there are four broad classes of implants used for resurfacing of the distal femur. In one configuration, the posterior cruciate ligament is retained. In another design the ligament is sacrificed, relying on the articular geometry to provide stability. The third type of device is constrained, in the sense that an actual linkage is used between the femoral and tibial components. According to a fourth arrangement, the posterior cruciate is replaced with a cam on the femoral component and a post on the tibial component.
Many patents have been issued in relation to these design configurations, including the cam-and-post design configuration. Some of the earlier patents in this area include U.S. Pat. No. 4,213,209 to Insall et al; U.S. Pat. No. 4,298,992 to Burstein et al.
Other patents include U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,021 to Forte et al., which teaches a cam-and-post mechanism as well as a linking mechanism. Essentially, each component includes a varying surface and a cam member, so that both the tibial and the femoral component have separate and distinct cams that cooperate with a single tibial post.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,100 to Kester et al. discloses a cam/post type of arrangement with a unique type of cam and box enclosure. A portion of the box enclosure is intended to prevent hyperextension and posterior translation. As noted in particular in FIGS. 3 and 4 of the '100 patent, a large space exists between the cam 110 and the post 100 which permits a translation to occur prior to engagement of the cam left of post.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,577 to Herrington et al. provides a cam on the femur with a geometry meant to contact the post through a large range of motion. This design attempts to provide the function of multiple cams by providing an area that acts as a separate bearing surface. As such, the cam effectively moves through a range of motion while contacting the post. Depending on the articular geometry which differs than the geometry of the cam post mechanism, this could lead to a variety of problems as well as significantly constrained motion, either between the cam and the post or between the two articulating surfaces.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,342 to Draganich et al. describes a cam member with including a bearing surface at complimenting an articulating surface. As in other previous designs, this represents a complex cam geometry meant to capture the post in certain degrees of the range of motion.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,405 to Van Zyle et al. Discloses a femoral component with two distinct cam structures, one located at point 44, the other located at 46 in the drawings. The cam member 44 is meant to contact the anterior surface of the post 24 to prevent hyperextension, while cam surface 46 is a posterior located cam meant to have contact throughout the range of flexion. As noted in FIG. 6A of the '405 patent, there is a space between the cam and the post when the knee is in extension, necessitating anterior translation of the femur on the tibia prior to contacting the posterior cam.
Many other patents directed to knee-replacement surgery include cam-and-post mechanisms. But in all cases, either the full range of joint motion is precluded, or translation is allowed to occur which could lead to premature wear.
FIG. 1
is a drawing which illustrates a typical prior-art cam-and-post mechanism. Item
102
is a tibial insert or tibial component having a post
103
protruding into a box-like recess of the femoral component
100
.
FIG. 1A
shows the system in extension, whereas
FIG. 1B
shows the system in flexion. In
FIG. 1A
, a femoral component
100
includes a cam
101
which has not yet engaged with a post
103
.
In
FIG. 1B
, following a considerable amount of flexion, the cam
101
finally engages with the post
103
. Until engagement occurs, however, the component
100
may be permitted to slide relative to the tibial insert. The need remains, therefore, for an improved distal femoral prosthesis having multiple distinct cams contacting a post on its posterior surface to a provide more normal range of motion for cruciate substituting knee replacement.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention resides in a distal femoral knee-replacement component configured for use in a cruciate-substituting situation involving a tibial component having a bearing surface and a superior post with a posterior aspect. As with existing configurations, the component is comprised of a body having a pair of medial and lateral condylar protrusions and an intercondylar region therebetween dimensioned to receive the tibial post. In contrast to prior-art devices, however, the inventive component provides additional points of cam action to facilitate a more normal range of knee motion.
In the preferred embodiment, the invention facilitates a more normal rollback while inhibiting initial translation which could lead to increased wear and sub-optimal patella femoral mechanics. To accomplish this goal, the inventive component includes a distinct point of cam action to prevent early translation at the initiation of flexion, and a distinct point of cam action to prevent a dislocation of the femoral component over the tibial post which is known to occur in cruciate-substituting designs. According to the invention, these points of cam action may be used separately or in combination.
In the preferred embodiment, the component includes three distinct points of cam action. The first is preferably located substantially where existing cams are found, namely, at a point spaced apart a slight distance posteriorly relative to the post in full extension. According to the invention, however, a second point of cam action is located immediately adjacent the posterior aspect of the superior post to minimize and, ideally, prevent anterior translation at the initiation of flexion. The third point of cam action is preferably located more posteriorly to allow enhanced flexion without a dislocation of the knee.
In terms of structure, the points of cam action may be implemented using any member or combination of elements operative to provide distinct stages of cooperation with the posterior aspect of the superior post. For example, transverse bars may be used which bridge, or partially bridge, the intercondylar space. The members or elements need not be straight across, but may instead be curved, with the post being curved to allows for a rotation, if so desired. The cam structures according to the invention may also be connected to one another forming points of contact as opposed to complete transverse elements such as distinct bars.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4650490 (1987-03-01), Figgie, III
patent: 4888021 (1989-12-01), Forte et al.
patent: 4892547 (1990-01-01), Brown
patent: 4936847 (1990-06-01), Manginelli
patent: 4936853 (1990-06-01), Fabian et al.
patent: 4959071 (1990-09-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5007932 (1991-04-01), Bekki et al.
patent: 5007933 (1991-04-01), Sidebotham et al.
patent: 5011496 (1991-04-01), Forte et al.
patent: 5133759 (1992-07-01), Turner
patent: 5147405 (1992-09-01), Van Zile et al.
patent: 5147406 (1992-09-01), Houston et al.
patent: 5152797 (1992-10-01), Luckman et al.
patent: 5236461 (1993-08-01), Forte
patent: 5330532 (1994-07-01), Ranawat
patent: 5330534 (1994-07-01), Herrington et al.
patent: 5358527 (1994-10-01), Forte
patent: 5370699 (1994-12-01), Hood et al.
patent: 5480445 (1996-01-01), Burkinshaw
patent: 5549686 (1996-08-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5549687 (1996-08-01), Coates et al.
patent: D374078 (1996-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5554158 (1996-09-01), Vinciguerra et al.
patent: 5639279 (1997-06-01), Burkinshaw et al.
patent: 5658342 (1997-08-01), Draganich et al.
patent: 5702458 (1997-12-01), Burstein et al.
patent: 5800552 (1998-09-01), Forte
patent: 5824100 (1998-10-01), Kester et al.
patent: 5879392 (1999-03-01), McMinn
patent: 5997577 (1999-12-01), Herrington et al.
Gifford Krass Groh Sprinkle Anderson & Citkowski PC
Landrem Kamrin
MedIdea LLC
LandOfFree
Multiple-cam, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Multiple-cam, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Multiple-cam, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3017722