Multilayer materials

Details Multilayer materials Multilayer materials

1996-02-14

2003-09-23

Kishore, Gollamudi S. (Department: 1615)

Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions

Preparations characterized by special physical form

Implant or insert

C424S423000, C424S427000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06623747

ABSTRACT:

This invention relates to composite materials for biomedical use that possess considerably improved retention of an aqueous layer on the surfaces. The invention also relates to the production of such materials from materials that possess suitable bulk properties, but inadequate retention of an aqueous layer. In a particular aspect, the materials and method of this invention are useful for the fabrication of ophthalmic devices, e.g. contact lenses.
BACKGROUND TO INVENTION
There are many applications of materials where retention of a thin film of aqueous fluid is desirable. For example, the retention of an aqueous fluid layer is beneficial for lubrication of catheters, the retention of an aqueous fluid layer can reduce protein fouling on the surface of pacemakers and artificial vascular grafts, or the retention of an aqueous fluid layer can prevent the colonization of a surface by bacteria as they are unable to attach properly. In another aspect, the facile movement of an eyelid over a contact lens is important for the comfort of the wearer; this sliding motion is facilitated by the presence of a continuous layer of tear fluid on the contact lens, a layer which lubricates the tissue/lens interface. However, clinical tests have shown that currently available contact lenses partially dry out between blinks, thus increasing friction between the eyelid and the lens. The increased friction results in soreness of the eyes and movement of the contact lens. Since the average period between blinks is ca. 12 seconds, it would be advantageous to fabricate a wettable and biocompatible contact lens that can hold a continuous layer of tear fluid for more than 12 seconds. Current biomedical materials do not reach this target; for instance, contact lenses fabricated from highly water swellable polymer pHEMA retain such a tear layer for approximately 5 seconds only.
Thus materials with wettable and biocompatible surfaces are highly desirable for many applications. The wettability of materials is strongly dependent on the chemical composition of the material surface. In particular, the ability of the surface to hold a continuous layer of an aqueous solution, such as tear fluid, is affected by the composition of the material surface. Early attempts to solve the wettability problem in the ophthalmic field were based on producing hydrophilic materials. For example, in an attempt to make wettable soft contact lenses, silicone elastomers with pendant epoxy groups were prepared by crosslinking epoxidized silicone compounds (French patent FR 2,622,201, J. M. Frances and G. Wajs). The elastomers were rendered wettable by grafting glucuronic acid onto the epoxy groups. The disadvantage of incorporating hydrophilic species into polymers by bulk synthesis is that the optimum balance of optical properties (e.g., transparency and refractive index), mechanical properties (e.g. strength, hardness, gas permeability and elasticity) and processability of the material obtainable will be worse than conventional materials and may not satisfy the application. The incorporation of hydrophilic monomers is not appropriate for improving the wettability of fluoropolymer- or acrylate-based lenses.
In an attempt to fabricate hard contact lenses which are compatible with the cornea and ocular fluid, dextran ester monovinyl compounds have been copolymerised with various acrylates (Japanese patent JP 63/309914, H. Kitaguni et al.). Dextran/methyl methacrylate copolymers have been prepared by graft polymerisation and have yielded wettable contact lenses (Y. Onishi et al. in Contemp. Top. Polym. Sci. 4, 149 (1984)). The preparation of dextran ester copolymers by bulk polymerisation methods offers limited scope for improving the wettability of contact lenses in general. The disadvantage of incorporating hydrophilic compounds into polymers by bulk synthesis is that the optical properties (e.g., transparency and refractive index), mechanical properties (e.g., strength, hardness, gas permeability and elasticity) and processability of the material cannot be optimized independently.
A method of modifying the surface of contact lenses has been disclosed in GB 2,163,436 Halpern). According to said method the lens is coated with a carbohydrate which is then crosslinked either covalently with a polyisocyanate or electrostatically with a divalent cation. The process results in a crosslinked skin which is not covalently bonded to the lens and will delaminate when subjected to a shearing force e.g. by an eyelid.
An alternative approach has been disclosed in WO 90/04609 (Sepracor). Polymeric substrates, especially polymeric membranes, having reactive groups such as hydroxy or amino groups at the ends of the polymer chains thereof are reacted with a polyfunctional linker moiety having terminal groups such as epoxy, carbonyl, carboxy, amino, halo, hydroxy, sulfonylhalide, acyl halide, isocyanato, or combinations thereof, which in turn are bonded with a ligand such as hydroxyethylcellulose or dextran. Since the molecular weight of the polymer chains in the substrate is high, the density of chain ends, especially at the surface, will be low, and therefore the density of grafted polysaccharide chains will be low.
The use of dextran and other carbohydrates for surface modification of polymers has also been reported by WO 83/03977, however, in that case the linker moiety is a silane and articles to be treated such as contact lenses are not disclosed.
Additional prior art is directed to modification of the surfaces of contact lenses (U.S. Pat. No. 5,080,924) or ocular implants (WO 93/03776), respectively, wherein amino groups at the surface thereof are reacted with dialdehydes and are then coupled with polysaccharides. However, the reaction of an aldehyde with the hydroxyl groups of a polysaccharide will yield an acid-labile ketal bond.
The above methods all require the presence of the article of a chemically reactive group suitable for the intended covalent reaction. Many materials of interest for ophthalmic applications and implantable biomaterial devices do not possess suitable reactive surface groups, for instance, silicon-based contact lenses and polytetrafluoroethylene vascular grafts. The present invention also comprises methods for the activation of a device surface, the method being generic, so that the surface of any material with suitable bulk properties can be converted to be receptive for the covalent immobilization of a coating which is highly retentious for aqueous layers. In this embodiment of the invention the surface of the polmyeric material is activated preferably by a gas plasma (glow discharge) surface treatment method.
A number of surface treatment techniques for polymeric materials are known in the art: Corona Discharge, Flame Treatment, Acid Etching, and a number of other methods intended to perform chemical modification of the surface. Among the disadvantages of these techniques are the use of or production of hazardous chemicals, the often excessive depth of treatment, non-uniformity of treatment at a microscopic level, and often severe etching and pitting that leads to changes in surface topography. The depth of treatment is important because with clear materials such as those required for lenses the optical clarity and surface smoothness become affected after an excessively harsh treatment.
Treatment of polymeric surfaces by gas plasmas provides the advantages of very low treatment depth, and uniformity on a microscopic scale. A gas plasma (also known as glow discharge) is produced by electrical discharge in a gas atmosphere at reduced pressure (“vacuum”). It creates a stable, partially ionized gas that may be utilized for effecting reactions on the surface of the substrate because the gas plasma environment activates even chemical compounds that are unreactive under normal conditions. The treatment intensity at the surface is generally relatively strong, and yet the penetration depth of gas plasma treatment is very low, of the order of 5 to 50 nanometres, at a treatment intensity sufficient for useful surface modificatio

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Multilayer materials does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Multilayer materials, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Multilayer materials will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3079362