Movie projection lens

Optical: systems and elements – Lens – With field curvature shaping

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C359S558000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06317268

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to projection lens in general and in particular to a movie projection lens for 35 millimeter movie film.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In order to improve the image quality of movies, it is important to design projection lenses with higher MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) values. Some enhanced optical designs have been implemented in the last twenty years which improved the quality of movies.
FIG. 1
shows a cross section of an Ultra Star HD lens with a focal length of 85 mm, which represents the current state of the art. See “Press release Fernseh-Und Kinotechnik 10/88.” An improvement in the MTF of this design is shown in
FIG. 2
a
comparing it to the MTF of a competing product, the Cinelux-Ultra MC lens. The MTF of the Ultra Star HD lens across the image field for three spatial frequencies, 30 lines/mm, 50 lines/mm, and 70 lines/mm is illustrated in
FIG. 2
b
. While these newer designs have had a significant impact on the image quality of movies, progress can still be made to further push the state of the art of movie projection lens optics.
The primary limiting factor in projector lens optics is secondary color aberration, both axial and lateral. Primary axial color aberration is corrected when light at the ends of the visible spectrum, red and blue, are brought to the same focus. Secondary axial color aberration is the focus separation between the light in the center of the visible spectrum and the light at the ends of the visible spectrum. Spherochromatism, the variation of spherical aberration with wavelength limits the performance of state of the art lenses, as does secondary lateral color aberration, which is the variation of image size between images in the center of the visible spectrum and the ends of the visible spectrum. Secondary chromatic aberration is notoriously difficult and expensive to correct because exotic glasses are required if a conventional all-refractive optical system is used. Glass with the required optical properties is expensive, and is typically difficult to manufacture.
It has been known in the art that diffractive lenses can reduce chromatic aberrations. The earliest references on this subject were applied to holographic lenses, a particular type of diffractive lens. See G. M. Morris, “Diffraction Theory for an Achromatic Fourier Transform,” Appl. Opt. 20, 2017 (1981); T. Stone and N. George, “Hybrid Singlet Arbitrarily Dispersive Element,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A4(13), 77(1987); T. Stone and N. George, “Hybrid Diffractive-refractive Lenses and Achromats,” 27(14), 2969(1988). Diffractive lenses, with an effective V number of −3.45 in the visible, have large dispersions and are opposite to that of refractive glass lenses, enabling compensation of refractive lens dispersions by using weak diffractive lens powers.
Many patents have issued taking advantage of this fact, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,923,479, 5,883,744, 5,880,879, and 5,790,321. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,923,479 teaches how to use one diffractive lens to reduce both axial and lateral color aberration for a retro-focus type lens. A retro-focus lens has a front negative group and a positive rear group producing a back focus greater than the lens focal length. In this patent the diffractive lens must meet certain conditions and be placed within the rear positive group. None of these references disclose the use of more than one diffractive optic to correct both axial and lateral color simultaneously, particularly both secondary axial and lateral chromatic aberrations.
The use of diffractive lenses in a movie projection lens is particularly beneficial to correct color aberration for a number of reasons. Movie projection lenses must withstand very hot environments due to the high power light sources used in movie projectors. The high power is needed because of the high magnifications required in movie theatres. It is not unusual to have magnifications of over three hundred times. The high temperatures reached by the projection optics has an impact not only on the glass choices, but the fact that no known optical cement can withstand such temperatures. This eliminates the optical design power of using cemented doublets. For example, it would normally be beneficial to use cemented doublets in the outer lens groups to correct lateral color aberration. The inability to use cemented doublets to correct chromatic aberration can be compensated through the use of diffractive optics.
One of the negative aspects of using diffractive optics is that they generally produce more flare light than refractive lenses. This is particularly true for diffractive optics made by the binary method in which approximations to smooth surfaces are made in a stair step fashion.
FIG. 3
a
shows the continuous phase introduced into the optical wavefront by a refractive surface. Because the effects of phase repeat every 2#, or one wavelength of oscillation, it is possible to break up the phase in pieces every 2#, or one wavelength as shown in
FIG. 3
b
. This type of surface is known as a kinoform. See L. B. Lesem and P. M. Hirsch, “The Kinoform: A New Wavefront Reconstruction Device,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 13, pp. 150-155(1969). A true binary version of the surface is shown in
FIG. 3
c
, which has two phase levels, the surface being broken every half wavelength. A four-level binary approximation is shown in
FIG. 3
d
in which the surface is broken every quarter wavelength.
FIG. 3
e
is an eight-level binary version. Table 1 lists the diffraction efficiency for the various binary surfaces. The remaining light strikes the image in undesirable regions and becomes flare light. As can be seen, the more levels used in the binary diffractive optic, the more efficient it becomes with the kinoform being the most efficient.
TABLE I
Number of phase
Diffraction
levels
Figure
efficiency
2
2c
40.5%
4
2d
81.1%
8
2e
95.0%
16
98.7%
With the movie film projection, contrast ratios above 600 on theater screens are at the upper end of the capabilities of current theaters for film with a density range between D
max
and D
min
of 3.2 having an inherent capability of almost 1600 to one contrast ratio. The reduction is caused by flare light. Flare light from well-made kinoform diffractive lenses will not be easily detected under normal conditions. Also, because the scenes in movies are continually changing, the presence of small, additional flare on top of that already present will not be easily observable.
It is desirable to use diffractive lenses in a movie projector lens while limiting secondary axial and secondary lateral color aberration.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is the object of the present invention to provide a movie projection lens which limits secondary axial and secondary lateral color aberration.
Another object of this invention is to provide a movie projection lens having an improved working distance from the film to the lens.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide superior correction of both axial and lateral color, primary and secondary through the use of two diffractive lenses.
According to one aspect of the present invention a movie projection lens for forming an image over the visible spectrum, at high magnification, comprises a diffractive lens with negative power on the movie screen side of the movie projection lens, followed by a group of positive and negative refractive lens elements with overall negative power. This is followed by a diffractive lens with positive power, followed by a group of positive and negative refractive lens elements with overall positive power. The positive power diffractive lens has minimal affect on lateral chromatic aberration. The negative power diffractive lens affects both lateral and axial chromatic aberration and has a greater affect on lateral aberration than on axial aberration.
An advantage of the present invention is that it corrects primary axial and lateral color aberration and secondary axial and lateral color aberration without to using exotic glasses with abnormal disper

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Movie projection lens does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Movie projection lens, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Movie projection lens will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2618282

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.