Monitoring computer-controlled processes through a...

Data processing: artificial intelligence – Knowledge processing system – Knowledge representation and reasoning technique

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07933855

ABSTRACT:
The performance of a computer-controlled system (1) operating under the control of a first process (2), is monitored (4) by comparison (5) with a predetermined set of requirements (15, 25), to identify whether the performance of the system (1) meets the predetermined requirements. If the performance does not meet those requirements, an alternative program (22) may be selected, or generated from program elements stored in a library (60), to replace the current controller process (2).

REFERENCES:
patent: 5524176 (1996-06-01), Narita et al.
patent: 5577169 (1996-11-01), Prezioso
patent: 5721903 (1998-02-01), Anand et al.
patent: 5724488 (1998-03-01), Prezioso
patent: 5819033 (1998-10-01), Caccavale et al.
patent: 6078911 (2000-06-01), Bonissone et al.
patent: 6078924 (2000-06-01), Ainsbury et al.
patent: 6236978 (2001-05-01), Tuzhilin
patent: 6760684 (2004-07-01), Yang et al.
patent: 6839680 (2005-01-01), Liu et al.
patent: 6871186 (2005-03-01), Tuzhili et al.
patent: 7272586 (2007-09-01), Nauck et al.
patent: 7743078 (2010-06-01), Azvine et al.
patent: 2003/0037063 (2003-02-01), Schwartz
patent: 2004/0158567 (2004-08-01), Dettinger et al.
patent: 2005/0055369 (2005-03-01), Gorelik et al.
patent: 2005/0060332 (2005-03-01), Bernstein et al.
patent: 19537010 (1997-04-01), None
patent: 19914277 (2000-10-01), None
patent: 0 681 249 (1995-11-01), None
patent: 1 081 622 (2001-07-01), None
patent: WO 95/02855 (1995-01-01), None
patent: WO 96/14608 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 02/077879 (2002-10-01), None
patent: WO 03/003811 (2003-01-01), None
EPO Search report for corresponding EP App. 05252068.1-2218, Jun. 22, 2005.
PCT International Search Report for parent PCT/GB2006/001022, Jun. 23, 2006.
Elomaa et al., “General and Efficient Multisplitting of Numerical Attributes,” Machine Learning, vol. 36, pp. 201-244, 1999, XP009048584.
Elomaa et al., “Efficient Multisplitting Revisited:Optima-Preserving Elimination of Partition Candidates,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 97-126, 2004, XP002330976.
Zeidler J. et al., “Fuzzy Decision Trees and Numerical Attributes,” Fuzzy Systems, 1996, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on New Orleans, LA, USA, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, U.S. vol. 2, Sep. 8, 1996, XP010195828.
Peng Y. et al., “Soft Discretization to Enhance the Continuous Decision Tree Induction,” Integrating Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning, ECML PKDD Workshop Notes, pp. 1-11, Sep. 2001XP002330977.
Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy Sets,” Inform. Control, vol. 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.
Nauck et al., “Foundations of Neuro-Fuzzy Systems,” Wiley Chichester, 1997 (Abstract of book provided; see relevance, p. 2 of specification).
Fayyad et al., “On the Handling of Continuous-Valued Attributes in Decision Tree Generation,” Machine Learning, vol. 8, pp. 87-102, 1992.
Elomaa et al. “Finding Optimal Multi-Splits for Numerical Attributes in Decision Tree Learning,” NeuroCOLT Technical Report Series NC-TR-96-041, Department of Computer Science, Royal Holloway University of London, 1996.
Kuncheva, L., “How good are fuzzy if-then classifiers?,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: 30, pp. 501-509, 2000.
Gal, A. et al, “A Framework for Modeling and Evaluating Automatic Semantic Reconciliation,” VLDB Journal (2005), vol. 14, No. 1, Dec. 19, 2003, pp. 50-67.
Gal, A. et al, “Automatic Ontology Matching using Application Semantics,” published on the Internet, Online! 2003, pp. 1-16, XP002339557; http://iew3.technion.ac.il/OntoBuilder/Data/10.OntoBuilder—Papers/dis.pdf; also published in AI Magazine, Spring 2005, vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 21-31, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Rahm E. et al, “A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching,” VLDB Journal, vol. 10, No. 4 (Dec. 2001), pp. 334-350, XP002263938; Published online: Nov. 21, 2001, Springer Verlag, Berlin, DE.
Ying Ding et al, “Ontology Research and Development: Part 2—A Review of Ontology mapping and evolving,” Journal of Information Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 28, No. 5, 2002, pp. 375-388.
European Search Report dated Aug. 17, 2005 in EP 05251932 and EPO Communication dated Aug. 26, 2005 in EP 05251932.9 transmitting the European search report.
International Search Report dated May 17, 2006 in PCT/GB2006/001050.
Elfeky M. G. et al, “TAILOR: A Record Linkage Toolbox,” Proceedings of the 18thInternational Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2002), San Jose, CA, IEEE Computer Society.
Proceedings of IJCAI-03 Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWeb-03), Aug. 9-10, 2003, Acapulco, Mexico.
Newcombe, H. B. et al, “Automatic Linkage of Vital Records,” Science, 1959, vol. 130, pp. 954-959.
Fellegi, I. P. et al, “A theory for Record Linkage,” J. American Statistical Assoc., 1969, vol. 64, No. 328, pp. 1183-1210.
Dey, D. et al., “A Distance-Based Approach to Entity Reconciliation in Heterogeneous Databases,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2002, 14(3), pp. 567-582.
Bilenko, M. et al., “Adaptive Name Matching in Information Integration,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18, pp. 16-23.
Madhavan, J. et al., “Generic Schema Matching with Cupid,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Rome, Italy, 2001, pp. 49-58.
Doan, A. et al., “Learning to Match the Schemas of Data Sources: A Multistrategy Approach,” Machine Learning, 2003, 50(3), pp. 279-301.
Modica, G. et al., “The Use of Machine-Generated Ontologies in Dynamic Information Seeking,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001 (2172), pp. 433-448.
Noy, N. F. et al., “The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping,” Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford University, Aug. 5, 2003, http://smi.stanford.edu/smi-web/reports/SMI-2003-0973.pdf.
Berlin, J. et al., “Autoplex: Automated Discovery of Content for Virtual Databases,” Lecture notes in Computer Science, 2001 (2172), pp. 108-122.
Gal, A. et al., “A Model for Schema Integration in Heterogeneous Databases,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS '03), 2003, Hong Kong, IEEE Press.
Smith C. U. et al, “Software Performance Engineering: A Case Study Including Performance Comparison With Design Alternatives,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE Inc., New York, US, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1993, pp. 720-741; XP000413274.
Smith C. U. et al., “Performance Engineering Evaluation of Object-Oriented Systems with SPE*ED,” Internet, Dec. 31, 1997, pp. 1-21, XP002349373, http://www.perfeng.com/papers/tools97.pdf.
Steigner C. et al., “Performance Tuning of Distributed Applications with CoSMoS,” Proceedings 21stInternational Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Apr. 16-19, 2001, Mesa, AZ, USA, Apr. 19, 2001, pp. 173-180, XP002349374.
International Search Report dated Jan. 4, 2007 in International Application No. PCT/GB2006/000674.
European Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2005 in Application No. EP 05 25 1582.
European Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2005 in Application No. EP 05 25 1583.
Liggesmeyer, “Selecting Engineering Techniques using Fuzzy Logic Based Decision Support”, Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 1996. Proceedings., IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Friedrichshafen, Germany, Mar. 11-15, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc., US, Mar. 11, 1996, pp. 427-434, XP010159694.
Lelescu et al., “Approximate Retrieval From Multimedia Databases Using Relevance Feedback”, String Processing and Information Retrieval Symposium, 1999 and International Workshop on Groupware Cancun, Mexico Sep. 22-24, 1999, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc., US, Sep. 22, 1999, pp. 215-223, XP010353490.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Monitoring computer-controlled processes through a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Monitoring computer-controlled processes through a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Monitoring computer-controlled processes through a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2625069

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.