Modulation of gene expression using localization domains

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Animal cell – per se ; composition thereof; process of... – Method of regulating cell metabolism or physiology

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S455000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06919204

ABSTRACT:
Methods and compositions for regulating gene expression are provided. In particular, methods and compositions comprising localization domains, and fusions of localization domains with DNA binding domains and, optionally regulatory domains, are provided.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6534261 (2003-03-01), Cox, III et al.
patent: 6607882 (2003-08-01), Cox, III et al.
patent: 2002/0160940 (2002-10-01), Case et al.
patent: WO 97/11972 (1997-04-01), None
patent: WO 00/41566 (2000-07-01), None
patent: WO 00/42219 (2000-07-01), None
patent: WO 01/30843 (2001-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/83793 (2001-11-01), None
Tweedie et al, Nature Genetics, Dec., 1999, vol. 23: pp. 389-390.
Amir et al., “Rett Syndrome is Caused by Mutations in X-LinedMECP2, Encoding Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2,”Nature Genet.23:185-188 (1999).
Ashburner, Puffing Patterns inDrosophila Melangogasterand Related Species,Results Probl. Cell Differ.4:101-151 (1972).
Bird, “Does DNA Methylation Control Transposition of Selfish Elements in the Germline?,”Trend Genet.13:469-472 (1997).
Bird et al., “Gene Number, Noise Reduction and Biological Complexity,”Trend Genet.11:94-99 (1995).
Bird and Wolffe, “Methylation-Induced Repression-Belts, Braces, and Chromatin,”Cell99:451-454 (1999).
Boeke et al., “The Minimal Repression Domain of MBD2b Overlaps with the Methyl-CpG-Bindign Domain and Binds Directly to Sin3A,”Journal of Biological Chemistry275(45):34963-34967 (2000).
Buschhausen et al., “Chromatin Structure is Required to Block Transcription of the Methylated Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase Gene,”PNAS USA84:1177-1181 (1987).
Cao et al., “Conserved Plant Genes With Similarity to Mammalian de novo DNA Methyltransferases,”PNAS USA97:4979-4984 (2000).
Colot et al., “Eukaryotic DNA Methylation as an Evolutionary Device,”BioEssays21:402-411 (1999).
Cross et al., “Purification of CpG Islands Using a Methylated DNA Binding Column,”Nature Genetics6(3):236-244 (1994).
Grunstein et al., “Histone Acetylation in Chromatin Structure and Transcription,”Nature389:349-352 (1997).
Heard et al., “X-Chromosome Inactivation in Mammals,”Annual Rev. Gent.31:571-610 (1997).
Iguchi-Arigan et al., “CpG Methylation of the cAMP-Responsive Enhancer/Promoter Sequence TGACGTCA Abolishes Specific Factor Binding as Well as Transcriptional Activation,”Genes&Development3:612-619 (1989).
Kaludov and Wolffe, “MeCP2 Driven Transcriptional Repression In Vitro: Selectivity for Methylated DNA, Action at a Distance and Contacts with the Basal Transcription Machinery,”Nucleic Acids Research28(9):1921-1928 (2000).
Kass et al., “DNA Methylation Directs a Time-Dependent Repression of Transcription Initiation,”Current Biol.7:157-165 (1997).
Kremer et al., “Mapping of DNA Instability at the Fragile X to Trinucleotide Repeat Sequence p(CCG)n,”Science252:1711-1714 (1991).
Lei et al., “De novo DNA Cytosine Methyltransferase Activities in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells,”Development122:3195-3205 (1996).
Li et al., “Targeted Mutation of the DNA Methyltransferase Gene Results in Embryonic Lethality,”Cell69:915-926 (1992).
Mannervik et al., “Transcriptional Coregulators in Development,”Science284:606-609 (1999).
Meehan et al., “Characterization of MeCP2, a Vertebrate DNA Binding Protein with Affinity for Methylated DNA,”Nucleic Acids Res.20:5085-5092 (1992).
Nan et al.,“MeCP2 is a Transcriptional Repressor With Abundant Binding Sites in Genomic Chromatin,”Cell88(4):471-481 (1997).
Ohki et al., “Solution Structure of the Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain of the Methylation-Dependent Transcriptional Respressor MBD1,”The EMBO J.18:(23):6653-6661 (1999).
Okano et al., “DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b Are Essential for De Novo Methylation and Mammalian Development,”Cell99:247-257 (1999).
Okano et al., “Cloning and Characterization of a Family of Novel Mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) Methyltransferases,”Nature Genet.19:219-220 (1998).
Siegfried et al., “DNA Methylation: A Molecular Lock,”Curr. Biol.7:R305-307 (1997).
Steinbach et al., “Somatic Linker Histones Cause Loss of Mesodermal Competence inXenopus,” Nature389:395-399 (1997).
Van Steensel et al., “Identification of In Vivo DNA Trargets of Chromatin Proteins Using Tethered Dam Methyltransferase,”Nature Biotechnology18(4):424-428 (2000).
Wakefield et al., “The Solution Structure of the Domin From MeCP2 That Binds to Methylated DNA,”J. Mol. Biol.291:1055-1065 (1999).
Wolffe et al., “Co-Repressor Complexes and Remodeling Chromatin for Repression,”Biochemical Society Transactions28(4):379-386 (2000).
Xu et al., “Chromosome Instability and Immunodeficiency Syndrome Caused by Mutations in a DNA Methyltransferase Gene,”Nature402:187-189 (1999).
Yoder et al., “Cytosine Methylation and the Ecology of Intragenomic Parasites,”Trend Genet.13:335-340 (1997).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Modulation of gene expression using localization domains does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Modulation of gene expression using localization domains, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modulation of gene expression using localization domains will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3415701

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.