Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Method of introducing a polynucleotide molecule into or... – The polynucleotide encodes an inhibitory rna molecule
Reexamination Certificate
2008-08-04
2010-11-09
Kumar, Vinod (Department: 1638)
Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and
Method of introducing a polynucleotide molecule into or...
The polynucleotide encodes an inhibitory rna molecule
C800S278000, C800S286000, C800S287000, C435S468000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07829760
ABSTRACT:
Compositions and methods for modulating MIOX activity are provided. Such compositions include nucleotide sequences for novel MIOX sequences obtained from maize, amino acid sequences for the proteins encoded by the nucleotide sequences of the invention, and variants and fragments thereof. Methods of the invention involve introducing into a plant a nucleotide construct comprising a MIOX nucleotide sequence operably linked to a promoter that drives expression in a plant. Expression of the novel nucleotide sequences disclosed herein confers advantageous agronomic properties on a plant. Transformed plants, plant cells, and seeds are additionally provided.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5689054 (1997-11-01), Raboy
patent: 6197561 (2001-03-01), Martino-Catt et al.
patent: 6291224 (2001-09-01), Martino-Catt et al.
patent: 2003/0009011 (2003-01-01), Shi et al.
patent: 2003/0079247 (2003-04-01), Shi et al.
patent: 2004/0034888 (2004-02-01), Liu et al.
patent: 2004/0214272 (2004-10-01), La Rosa et al.
patent: 2004/0216190 (2004-10-01), Kovalic
patent: 2006/0123505 (2006-06-01), Kikuchi et al.
patent: 2006/0150283 (2006-07-01), Alexandrov et al.
patent: 1033405 (2000-09-01), None
patent: WO 99/05298 (1999-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/07211 (1999-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/55879 (1999-11-01), None
patent: WO 02/059324 (2002-08-01), None
patent: WO 03/027243 (2003-04-01), None
patent: WO 2005/078079 (2005-08-01), None
Wells (Biochemistry 29:8509-8517, 1990).
Ngo et al., (The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, K. Merz., and S. Le Grand (eds.) pp. 492-495,1994).
Keskin et al. (Protein Science, 13:1043-1055, 2004).
Thornton et al. (Nature structural Biology, structural genomics supplement, Nov. 2000).
Guo et al. (PNAS, 101: 9205-9210, 2004).
Gutterson (HortScience 30:964-966,1995).
Bruening (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95:13349-13351, 1998).
Elomaa et al. (Molecular Breeding, 2:41-50, 1996).
Colliver et al. (Plant molecular Biology, 35:509-522, 1997).
Emery et al. (Current Biology 13:1768-1774, 2003).
Arner, R.J., et al., “myo-Inositol Oxygenase: Molecular Cloning and Expression of a Unique Enzyme that Oxidizes myo-Inositol and D-Chiro-Inositol,”Biochem. J., 2001, pp. 313-320, vol. 360.
Bollmann, O., et al., “The Enzymes Involved in the Synthesis of Phytic Acid inLemna gibba(Studies on the Biosynthesis of Cyclitols, XL),”Molecular&Cellular Biochemistry, 1980, pp. 171-175, vol. 30(3).
Colliver, S.P., et al., “Differential Modification of Flavonoid and Isoflavonoid Biosynthesis with an Antisense Chalcone Synthase Construct in TransgenicLotus corniculatus,” Plant Molecular Biology, 1997, pp. 509-522, vol. 35.
Elomaa, P., et al., “Transformation of Antisense Constructs of the Chalcone Synthase Gene Superfamily intoGerbera hybrida: Differential Effect on the Expression of Family Members,”Molecular Breeding, 1996, pp. 41-50, vol. 2.
Falcon-Perez, J. M., et al., “Functional Domain analysis of the Yeast ABC Transporter Yeflp by Site-directed Mutagenesis,”J. Biol. Chem., Aug. 13, 1999, pp. 23584-23590, vol. 274, No. 33.
Guo, H.H., et al., “Protein Tolerance to Random Amino Acid Change”,PNAS, Jun. 22, 2004, pp. 9205-9210, vol. 101, No. 25.
Hitz, W.D., et al., “Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of a Mutation That Confers a Decreased Raffinosaccharide and Phytic Acid Phenotype on Soybean Seeds,”Plant Physiol., Feb. 2002, pp. 650-660, vol. 128.
Keskin, O., et al., “A New, Structurally Nonredundant, Diverse Data Set of Protein-Protein Interfaces and Its Implications,”Protein Science, 2004, pp. 1043-1055, vol. 13.
Koller, E., et al., “Myo-Inositol Oxygenase from Oat Seedlings,”Molecular&Cellular Biochemistry, Jan. 31, 1976, pp. 33-39, vol. 10, No. 1.
Loewus, M.W., et al., “Enantiomeric Form ofmyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Produced bymyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate Synthase andmyo-Inositol Kinase in Higher Plants,”Plant Physiol, 1982, pp. 1661-1663, vol. 70.
Loewus, F.A., and P.P.N. Murthy, “myo-Inositol Metabolism in Plants,”Plant Science, 2000, pp. 1-19, vol. 150(1).
Raboy, V., et al., “Origin and Seed Phenotype of Maizelow phytic acid1-1 andlow phytic acid2-1,”Plant Physiol., Sep. 2000, pp. 355-368, vol. 124.
Shi, J., et al., “The Maize Low-Phytic Acid Mutantlpa2is Caused by Mutation in an Inositol Phosphate Kinase Gene,”Plant Physiology, 2003, pp. 507-515, vol. 131(2), American Society of Plant Biologists, USA.
Shi, J., et al., “The Maizelow-phytic acid 3Encodes a Myo-inositol Kinase That Plays a Role in Phytic Acid Biosynthesis in Developing Seeds,”The Plant Journal, 2005, pp. 708-719, vol. 42.
Stein, A.J., and J.H. Geiger, “The Crystal Structure and Mechanism of 1-L-myo-Inositol-1-phosphate Synthase,”J. Biol. Chem., Mar. 15, 2002, pp. 9484-9491, vol. 227, No. 11.
Thornton, J.M., et al., “From Structure to Function: Approaches and Limitations,”Nature Structural Biology, Structural Genomics Supplement, Nov. 2000, pp. 991-994.
NCBI Database Report for Accession No. AF323175, Direct Submission on Nov. 21, 2000.
Liebergesell Matthias
Shi Jinrui
Singletary George W.
Alston & Bird LLP
Kumar Vinod
Pioneer Hi-Bred International , Inc.
LandOfFree
Modulating myo-inositol catabolism in plants does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Modulating myo-inositol catabolism in plants, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modulating myo-inositol catabolism in plants will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4177104