Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Plural display systems – Tiling or modular adjacent displays
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-25
2003-08-26
Hjerpe, Richard (Department: 2774)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Plural display systems
Tiling or modular adjacent displays
C345S001100, C348S383000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06611241
ABSTRACT:
The present invention relates to display devices and, in particular, to display devices comprising plural display elements.
The standard for conventional displays is the cathode ray tube (“CRT”) display such as is employed in television receivers, computer displays, information displays such as for airport and train station travel information and the like. CRTs have the desirable characteristics of a clear, bright display, even when viewed from a position off to the side, i.e. off its central axis, coupled with reliability and stability, all at low cost. As a result of the structures and dimensions of the deflection arrangements required to scan the electron beam of a CRT over its phosphor-coated faceplate, the depth of a CRT is typically about as great as the diagonal of the display faceplate. While this is acceptable for moderate screen sizes, for example, up to about 35 inch diagonal dimension, the depth becomes excessive for larger screen sizes. Even CRTs having screen diagonals of 25 to 35 inches may be too deep for convenient use in smaller rooms. Larger conventional optical projection displays have images in the 35- to 45-inch diagonal range, but also have substantial depth and do not have the image brightness, especially from off-central viewing positions, and stability of CRTs.
One conventional solution is to create a larger display by placing several smaller displays side by side. For example, twelve television sets or other CRT displays DD
1
through DD
12
could be stacked up three high by four wide to create a large screen display
10
in which one-twelfth of the image is displayed on each television set DD
1
-DD
12
, as illustrated in FIG.
1
. However, because the CRT in each television set both does not display an image all the way to the edges of its faceplate, and because the glass envelope of the faceplate is not exactly rectangular, there will necessarily be horizontal and vertical spaces
11
,
12
,
13
,
14
,
15
between the edges of the respective CRTs where no image is present. These spaces are often referred to as “seams” or “gaps.” While designers of large displays have tried to minimize the inactive edge areas of display modules comprising such display, and thereby minimize these seams or gaps, they have not been able to eliminate them, and so visible and annoying gaps remain in the images displayed by such devices.
Even with rear-projection systems, the mullions of their respective diffuser panels leave a visible image-less seam. Front-projection systems have eliminated the mullion problem, but have great difficulty in projecting a true combined image in the seam areas which are usually sought to be minimized by involved and time-consuming complex set up and alignment procedures. In any of the foregoing arrangements, differences in resolution, geometry, brightness, intensity, and color between the portions of the combined image, or sub-images, produced by the various display units making up a larger display can produce noticeable variations in the displayed image. Such effects are well known and easily seen, for example, in the jumbo television displays often used at sporting arenas, concerts and outdoor events.
In addition to the desire for large image size, there is also a need for high image resolution along with large size. This need is evident, for example, regarding high-definition television (HDTV) systems and industrial and military displays. For high-definition displays of maps and charts, or of surveillance images, displays having resolutions of 100 dots per inch over a 30×40 inch display are desired. Such images include 12 mega-pixels of displayed information. Unfortunately, displays having such capabilities do not exist with conventional technologies. It is further desirable that such large display devices be easily transported and set up, and that they be available at a reasonable cost.
Accordingly, there is a need for a display system that is capable of providing high resolution and a virtually seamless image even over a relatively large display area.
To this end, the present invention comprises at least two image generators generating adjacent portions of an image on a screen, wherein the adjacent portions of the image overlap; and an image processor providing image data to the image generators including pixel data representative of particular pixels in the overlap that are adjusted so that the respective pixels generated therein by the two image generators combine to form the particular pixels.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of forming a substantially seamless pixelated image comprises:
forming two contiguous pixelated sub-images having a region of overlap at their common edge;
determining the value of particular pixels in the region of overlap;
determining a correction function for changing the determined value of the particular pixels in the overlap region to a given value; and
applying the correction function to respective pixel values of each of the pixelated sub-images for each of the particular pixels in the overlap region.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4792720 (1988-12-01), Takenaka et al.
patent: 4825201 (1989-04-01), Watanabe et al.
patent: 4890314 (1989-12-01), Judd et al.
patent: 4969731 (1990-11-01), Ogino et al.
patent: 5005950 (1991-04-01), Morin
patent: 5136390 (1992-08-01), Inova et al.
patent: 5231481 (1993-07-01), Eouzan et al.
patent: 5264941 (1993-11-01), Nakano et al.
patent: 5396257 (1995-03-01), Someya et al.
patent: 5475447 (1995-12-01), Funado
patent: 5612741 (1997-03-01), Loban et al.
patent: 5694003 (1997-12-01), Takahashi et al.
patent: 5734446 (1998-03-01), Tokoro et al.
patent: 5784035 (1998-07-01), Hagiwara et al.
patent: 5793441 (1998-08-01), Hagerman
patent: 5956000 (1999-09-01), Kreitman et al.
patent: 6075567 (2000-06-01), Ohnishi
patent: 6181392 (2001-01-01), Greene et al.
patent: 6219011 (2001-04-01), Aloni et al.
patent: 6219099 (2001-04-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 6243055 (2001-06-01), Fergason
patent: 0 739 131 (1996-10-01), None
patent: 0 739 133 (1996-10-01), None
patent: 57 111187 (1992-07-01), None
Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/US98/25552.
M. Nakano, “Fujitsu Kiden Multipanel LCD Produces an Ultra-thin 78-inch display, at a mere 28 cm Thick”,LCD Intelligence, Ref. No. LCD-2-14-14 (7-2, p. 47) Apr. 1997, pp. 1-2.
Robert R. Simpson, “Videowalls: The Book of the Big Electronic Image”, 2nd Edition, Jun. 1997.
International Search Report.
Bechis Dennis John
Burstyn Herschel Clement
Carlin Donald Barry
Firester Arthur Herbert
McGinn Joseph Thomas
Burke William J.
Hjerpe Richard
Nguyen Kevin M.
Sarnoff Corporation
LandOfFree
Modular display system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Modular display system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modular display system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3076518