Pulse or digital communications – Receivers – Interference or noise reduction
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-16
2004-04-20
Corrielus, Jean B. (Department: 2631)
Pulse or digital communications
Receivers
Interference or noise reduction
C375S285000, C370S342000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06724845
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to processing of data signals. A specific application of the present invention relates to data signal processing involving filtering of asynchronously received data samples. The present invention has application, for example, as part of a radio receiver using digital signal processing circuitry to filter data samples corresponding to signal strength estimates having irregularly timed estimations, where the irregularly timed estimations correspond to the asynchronously received data samples.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Large-user radio communication systems have been developed into a complex inter-networked web of systems deployed to provide coverage internationally. Examples of such systems include cellular radio communication systems and other wireless systems such as wireless LANs. A cellular radio communication system includes multiple communication cells arranged adjacent one another to cover a larger regional area. Each cell limits the number of possible simultaneous communications to the number of channels provided in the cell. The size of the cell is defined through receivers and transmitters (a.k.a., “transceivers”) located within base stations that provide the communication channels through which the mobile radios communicate. A mobile radio communicates in a cellular system by communicating first with a number of close-proximity base stations before selecting the best or nearest base station with which to establish a radio communication link.
In providing a clear channel between the mobile radio and the selected base station, the prevention of interference from and to other radio communication links is an important concern. Generally, this concern is addressed through the use of an accurate method for determining with the nearest base station and by controlling the transmission power levels used in maintaining the communication. If the nearest base station is not accurately selected or changes without a timely update, the communication can overlap and interfere with other communications in the system. Similarly, if the transmission power used in maintaining the radio link within a given cell is not properly controlled at relatively low level, the excessive transmissions can cause intolerable levels of interference. Radio designers have attempted to avoid these problems by designing the mobile radio with a receiver designed to provide precision-selective filtering of the data communicated in such systems; namely, the data communicated between each mobile radio and its surrounding base stations.
Many communication systems, including both cellular systems and the GPS, include receivers that are highly dependent on filters to accurately decipher asynchronously-received data from interference signals, including signals from other radio communication links in the same system. This issue is best explained in the context of a specific system. In cellular communication systems, for instance, the mobile stations select the nearest base station by monitoring a control channel transmitted from each base station for its signal strength and selecting the nearest base station in response to comparing these channel reception levels for the best signal quality. The transmission power is controlled at minimum levels by using algorithms at the base station and/or the mobile radio and, in some systems, also by passing control information between the base station and the mobile radio during the communication. Many of these systems use direct-sequence, spread-spectrum (DSSS) code-division-multiple-access (CDMA) communication. In this type of system, the same frequency is commonly used by a plurality of users by breaking apart the communication and transmitting using different codes. At any given frequency, the signals of other users interfere with the measurements for the signal quality of the transmitting base stations. In an attempt to account for this interference, measurement methods determine the signal quality by computing the ratio of the signal reception level and the interference level, which is known as “SIR” or Signal to Interference Ratio, as described for example, by T. Dohi, et al: “Performance of SIR Based Power Control in the Presence of Non-uniform Traffic Distribution,” 1995 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications Record, pp. 334-338, November 1995. In addition to the SIR, the signal quality determination is also dependent on the estimates of the signal reception level which, in turn, is dependent on the accuracy in which these estimates are communicated, a problem known as “multi-path Rayleigh fading.”
Multi-path Rayleigh fading (“fading”) is caused by reflections of the signals being received from the base stations through the wireless communication medium. Communication of measured radio frequency (RF) signal strength is also subject to such fading. For cellular CDMA communication systems, the mobile station's selection of the nearest base station often consists of a search for the optimal CDMA pilot strength. This CDMA pilot strength search is subject to both fading and radio signal interference and is, therefore, particularly susceptible to error. The problem of fading is further aggravated when it is fast fading. Lingering effects of fast fading in signal search results may occur even after coherent and non-coherent integration efforts by the search process, and slower mobile speeds will aggravate this effect more than faster mobile speeds, which is opposite the effect of speed on slow fading signals as it applies to the signal searching process.
It has been determined that the adverse effects of fast fading can be overcome using one or more of the following three approaches: (1) increasing the dwell time to approximate the correlation interval for fast fading; (2) using IIR filtering to average out the effects of residual variance caused by the fading; and (3) searching more frequently to increase the probability of finding a pilot strength signal. Addressing the first of these approaches, the extent of the filter-response distortion in such approaches directly relates to the effect of the dwell time. The correlation time for fast fading is typically half a wavelength. For a 100 Hz dual dwell search, typically the coherent and non-coherent integration times are N=128 and L=16 for the first dwell. The comparison between dwell time and correlation time for different example conditions are given below.
Band
Speed
Corr Time
Dwell Time
Dwell/
(MHz)
(kmph)
(sec)
N*L
(sec)
Corr
800
8
0.16875
2048
0.05333333
0.316049
800
30
0.045
2048
0.05333333
1.185185
800
100
0.0135
2048
0.05333333
3.950617
1900
8
0.071053
2048
0.05333333
0.750617
1900
30
0.018947
2048
0.05333333
2.814815
1900
100
0.005684
2048
0.05333333
9.382716
From these comparisons, it can be recognized that the first approach alone, increasing the dwell time to approximate the correlation interval for fast fading, would be insufficient to eliminate the effects of fast fading.
Success of the second and third approaches depends on the effectiveness of the filtering for the particular application at hand. Using the cellular communication system as the target application, the purpose of an idle handoff from one cell to another cell is to provide for the demodulation of stronger pilots signals based on large scale effects like shadowing, while eliminating small scale effects like fast fading. To achieve this, multiple search results within a shadowing correlation time would need to be averaged, while results separated by more than the shadowing correlation time would need to be kept relatively uncorrelated. In connection with the present invention, two approaches have been considered for operation on the time series of consecutive search results to obtain this desired result. The first possibility is to not perform the conventional filtering function. If the search dwell time is significantly higher than the fast fading correlation time, then no further filtering would be needed to achieve the desired a
Corrielus Jean B.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics , N.V.
Zawilski Peter
LandOfFree
Modified filtering for asynchronous inputs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Modified filtering for asynchronous inputs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modified filtering for asynchronous inputs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3221837