Catalyst – solid sorbent – or support therefor: product or process – Zeolite or clay – including gallium analogs – And additional al or si containing component
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-29
2002-12-03
Silverman, Stanley S. (Department: 1754)
Catalyst, solid sorbent, or support therefor: product or process
Zeolite or clay, including gallium analogs
And additional al or si containing component
Reexamination Certificate
active
06489259
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a catalyst for purifying exhaust gases from an internal combustion engine. In particular, it relates to a NO
x
catalyst.
It is well known in the art to use catalyst compositions, including those commonly referred to as three-way conversion catalysts (“TWC catalysts”) to treat the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines. Such catalysts, containing precious metals like platinum, palladium, and rhodium, have been found both to successfully promote the oxidation of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) and to promote the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NO
x
) in exhaust gas, provided that the engine is operated around balanced stoichiometry for combustion (“combustion stoichiometry”; i.e., between about 14.7 and 14.4 air/fuel (A/F) ratio).
However, fuel economy and global carbon dioxide (CO
2
) emissions have made it desirable to operate engines under lean-burn conditions, where the air-to-fuel ratio is somewhat greater than combustion stoichiometry to realize a benefit in fuel economy. Diesel and lean-burn gasoline engines generally operate under highly oxidizing conditions (i.e., using much more air than is necessary to burn the fuel), typically at air/fuel ratios greater than 14.7 and generally between 19 and 35. Under these highly lean conditions, typical three-way catalysts exhibit little activity toward NO
x
reduction, as their reduction activity is suppressed by the presence of excess oxygen.
The control of NO
x
emissions from vehicles is a worldwide environmental problem. Lean-burn, high air-to-fuel ratio, and diesel engines are certain to become more important in meeting the mandated fuel economy requirements of next-generation vehicles. Development of an effective and durable catalyst for controlling NO
x
emissions under net oxidizing conditions accordingly is critical.
Recently, copper-ion exchanged zeolite catalysts have been shown to be active for selective reduction of NO
x
by hydrocarbons in the presence of excess oxygen. Platinum-ion exchanged zeolite catalyst is also known to be active for NO
x
reduction by hydrocarbons under lean conditions. However, this catalytic activity is significant only in a narrow temperature range around the lightoff temperature of hydrocarbon oxidation. All the known lean-NO
x
catalysts reported in the literature tend to lose their catalytic activity for NO
x
reduction when the catalyst temperature reaches well above the lightoff temperature of hydrocarbon oxidation. This narrow temperature window of the lean-NO
x
catalysts is considered to be one of the major technical obstacles, because it makes practical application of these catalysts difficult for lean-burn gasoline or diesel engines.). As an example, the Cu-zeolite catalysts deactivate irreversibly if a certain temperature is exceeded. Catalyst deactivation is accelerated by the presence of water vapor in the stream and water vapor suppresses the NO reduction activity even at lower temperatures. Also, sulfate formation at active catalyst sites and on catalyst support materials causes deactivation. Practical lean-NO
x
catalysts must overcome all three problems simultaneously before they can be considered for commercial use. In the case of sulfur poisoning, some gasoline can contain up to 1200 ppm of organo-sulfur compounds. Lean-NO
x
catalysts promote the conversion of such compounds to SO
2
and SO
3
during combustion. Such SO
2
will adsorb onto the precious metal sites at temperatures below 300° C. and thereby inhibits the catalytic conversions of CO, C
x
H
y
(hydrocarbons) and NO
x
. At higher temperatures with an Al
2
O
3
catalyst carrier, SO
2
is converted to SO
3
to form a large-volume, low-density material, Al
2
(SO
4
)
3
, that alters the catalyst surface area and leads to deactivation. In the prior art, the primary solution to this problem has been to use fuels with low sulfur contents.
Another alternative is to use catalysts that selectively reduce NO
x
in the presence of a co-reductant, e.g., selective catalytic reduction (SCR) using ammonia or urea as a co-reductant. Selective catalytic reduction is based on the reaction of NO with hydrocarbon species activated on the catalyst surface and the subsequent reduction of NO
x
to N
2
. More than fifty such SCR catalysts are conventionally known to exist. These include a wide assortment of catalysts, some containing base metals or precious metals that provide high activity. Unfortunately, just solving the problem of catalyst activity in an oxygen-rich environment is not enough for practical applications. Like most heterogeneous catalytic processes, the SCR process is susceptible to chemical and/or thermal deactivation. Many lean-NO
x
catalysts are too susceptible to high temperatures, water vapor and sulfur poisoning (from SO
x
).
Yet another viable alternative involves using co-existing hydrocarbons in the exhaust of mobile lean-burn gasoline engines as a co-reductant and is a more practical, cost-effective, and environmentally sound approach. The search for effective and durable non-selective catalytic reduction “NSCR” catalysts that work with hydrocarbon co-reductant in oxygen-rich environments is a high-priority issue in emissions control and the subject of intense investigations by automobile and catalyst companies, and universities, throughout the world.
A leading catalytic technology for removal of NO
x
from lean-burn engine exhausts involves NO
x
storage and reduction catalysis, commonly called the “lean-NO
x
trap”. The lean-NO
x
trap technology can involve the catalytic oxidation of NO to NO
2
by catalytic metal components effective for such oxidation, such as precious metals. However, in the lean NO
x
trap, the formation of NO
2
is followed by the formation of a nitrate when the NO
2
is adsorbed onto the catalyst surface. The NO
2
is thus “trapped”, i.e., stored, on the catalyst surface in the nitrate form and subsequently decomposed by periodically operating the system under stoichiometrically fuel-rich combustion conditions that effect a reduction of the released NO
x
(nitrate) to N
2
.
The lean-NO
x
-trap technology has been limited to use for low sulfur fuels because catalysts that are active for converting NO to NO
2
are also active in converting SO
2
to SO
3
. Lean NO
x
trap catalysts have shown serious deactivation in the presence of SO
x
because, under oxygen-rich conditions, SO
x
adsorbs more strongly on NO
2
adsorption sites than NO
2
, and the adsorbed SO
x
does not desorb altogether even under fuel-rich conditions. Such presence of SO
3
leads to the formation of sulfuric acid and sulfates that increase the particulates in the exhaust and poison the active sites on the catalyst. Attempts with limited success to solve such a problem have encompassed the use of selective SO
x
adsorbents upstream of lean NO
x
trap adsorbents. Furthermore, catalytic oxidation of NO to NO
2
is limited in its temperature range. Oxidation of NO to NO
2
by a conventional Pt-based catalyst maximizes at about 250° C. and loses its efficiency below about 100 degrees and above about 400 degrees. Thus, the search continues in the development of systems that improve lean NO
x
technology with respect to temperature and sulfur considerations.
Another NO
x
removal technique comprises a non-thermal plasma gas treatment of NO to produce NO
2
which is then combined with catalytic storage reduction treatment, e.g., a lean NO
x
catalyst, to enhance NO
x
reduction in oxygen-rich vehicle engine exhausts. In lean NO
x
, the NO
2
from the plasma treatment is adsorbed on a nitrate-forming material, such as an alkali material, and stored as a nitrate. By using a plasma, the lean NO
x
catalyst can be implemented with known NO
x
adsorbers, and the catalyst may contain less or essentially no precious metals, such as Pt, Pd and Rh, for reduction of the nitrate to N
2
. Accordingly, an advantage is that a method for NO
x
emission reduction is provided that is inexpensive and reliable. The plasma-assisted lean NO
x
trap can allo
Fisher Galen B.
Hemingway Mark
Kupe Joachim
LaBarge William J.
Cichosz Vincent A.
Delphi Technologies Inc.
Johnson Edward M.
Silverman Stanley S.
LandOfFree
Mixed zeolite NOx catalyst does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Mixed zeolite NOx catalyst, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mixed zeolite NOx catalyst will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2941012