Refrigeration – Using electrical or magnetic effect – Thermoelectric; e.g. – peltier effect
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-22
2002-01-15
Doerrler, William C. (Department: 3744)
Refrigeration
Using electrical or magnetic effect
Thermoelectric; e.g., peltier effect
C062S003400
Reexamination Certificate
active
06338251
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to cooling systems, More particularly, the invention is directed to cooling apparatuses and methods utilizing a mix of thermoelectric cooling with at least one other type of cooling.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Sub-ambient cooling is conventionally accomplished through gas/liquid vapor phase compression based refrigeration cycles using Freon type refrigerants to implement the heat transfers. Such refrigeration systems are used extensively for cooling human residences, foods, and vehicles. Sub-ambient cooling is also often used with major electronic systems such as mainframe server and workstation computers. Though vapor compression cooling can be very efficient, it does require significant moving hardware, including at a minimum, a compressor, a condenser, an evaporator, and related coolant transfer plumbing. As a result of the complexity and associated high cost, vapor compression cooling has not found material acceptance in small cooling applications, for example personal computers.
The fact that CMOS logic can operate materially faster as the temperature decreases has been well known for at least ten years. For example, if CMOS logic devices are operated at −50° C., the performance is improved by 50 percent over room ambient temperature operation. Liquid nitrogen operating temperatures, in the range of −196° C., have shown 200 percent performance improvements. Similar benefits have shown to accrue for integrated circuit wiring, where metal wiring resistances decrease by a factor of 2 for integrated circuits operated at −50° C. in comparison to room ambient operation. This improvement rivals the recent technological breakthrough of using copper wiring in integrated circuits to reduce interconnect resistance and thereby effectively increase the operating frequencies attainable. Thus, sub-ambient operation of integrated circuit logic devices, such as field effect transistors, as well as the interconnect wiring can materially improve the integrated circuit performance, leaving the question of how to accomplish such cooling in the confines of an ever decreasing size and materially shrinking cost environment.
Thermoelectric cooling is one alternative that has found some usage given the compact size of the prevalently used Peltier devices. A Peltier device is fabricated from semiconductor material such as bismuth telluride or lead telluride. Though new materials are now being evaluated in various universities, they have yet to reach fruition. The commonly used Peltier materials exhibit very high electrical conductivity and relatively low thermal conductivity, in contrast to normal metals which have both high electrical and thermal conductivity. In operation the Peltier devices transport electrons from a cold sink, at temperature T
cold
, to a hot sink, at temperature T
hot
, in response to an electric field formed across the Peltier device.
FIG. 1
schematically depicts a conventional Peltier type thermoelectric element (TE)
1
with DC power supply
2
created the electric field across TE
1
while at a load current
3
. The desired heat transfer is from cold sink
4
, at temperature T
cold
, to hot sink
6
, at temperature T
hot
. As indicated in the equation of
FIG. 1
, the net heat energy transported is composed of three elements, the first representing the Peltier effect (thermoelectric) contribution, the second defining negative Joule heating effects, and the third defining negative conductivity effects. The thermoelectric component is composed of the Seebeck coefficient, the temperature of operation (T
cold
) and the current being applied. The Joule heating component reflects that roughly half the Joule heating goes to the cold sink and remainder to the hot sink. Lastly, the negative component attributable to thermal conduction represents the heat flow through the Peltier device, as defined by the thermal conductivity of the Peltier device, from the hot sink to the cold sink. See equation (1).
q=&agr;T
cold
I−
½
I
2
R−K&Dgr;T
(1)
Peltier device thermoelectric cooling is very reliable in that the cooling is entirely solid state. The key negative aspect of thermoelectric cooling is the inefficiency, wherein a Peltier device cooling system efficiency is commonly only in the range of 20 percent for a relatively nominal temperature drop between the cold sink and the ambient. Equation (1) above clearly shows how quickly the Peltier device becomes inefficient. Since the thermoelectric component of the heat transport increases in direct proportion to the current, while the Joule heating increases in proportion to the square of the current, the thermal conduction is in direct proportion to the hot sink to cold sink temperature difference. For example, to cool at the rate of one watt at a sub-ambient temperature of 0° C., the Peltier cooling system must be powered with 5 watts. As the amount of heat to be transferred increases, the total power to be dissipated into the ambient mandates large convection devices and high output power supply circuits. Therefore, Peltier device thermoelectric cooling has poor efficiencies for large temperature differentials as compared to vapor compression cooling systems and as a result has not been considered a broadly applicable technology for improving integrated circuit performance.
Although vapor compression cooling systems are advantageous to current thermoelectric cooling configurations for sub-ambient cooling, such systems are not without limitations, especially for sub-zero centigrade cooling applications. Readily available vapor compression cooling systems are currently based on compressors and gas mixtures that are optimized for −20° C. operation. An example of such a sub-zero centigrade vapor compression cooling system
200
is shown in FIG.
2
. Vapor compression cooling system
200
includes compressor
201
, condenser
202
, and a coolant distribution system
203
including a counterflow heat exchanger
204
, evaporator
205
, JT valve
206
, input line
207
, and return line
208
all of which are well known in the art.
Vapor compression cooling system
200
is used to cool multi-chip modules (MCMs)
209
through providing a refrigerant in close proximity to MCMs
209
. The entire coolant distribution system
203
and MCMs
209
are insulated by superinsulation
210
. Superinsulation
210
and defrost control
211
limits the amount of condensation
212
produced as byproduct of utilizing vapor compression cooling system
200
for cooling to sub-zero centigrade temperatures.
As one attempts to achieve operating temperatures below −20° C., there are numerous problems and limitations encountered with vapor compression cooling systems. For example, as the operating temperature is decreased, the volume for the compressor will increase causing space and weight limitations. Additionally, as the operating temperature is decreased the cost for cooling will increase. Cooling systems operating at temperatures below −20° C. require increased insulation and defrost control to prevent further condensation
212
and condensation related reliability problems. A further limitation of vapor compression systems operating below −20° C. is the inability to respond quickly to cooling demands. For example, advances in processing speeds of integrated circuits create fast temperature transients that require expedient cooling that current vapor compression systems can not accommodate.
The cost performance ratio of vapor compression cooling systems is determined by the cost and performance of compressors and fluids in the refrigeration cycle. Zero-centigrade vapor compression cooling systems can leverage the cost performance ratio by producing high volumes of zero-degree centigrade compressors utilizing standard refrigerant fluids (R134, etc.) for ubiquitous industry applications. However, to achieve temperatures below 0° C., such as −50° C., new compressors and fluids must be used. This added demand in performance
Doerrler William C.
Salys Casimer K.
Shulman Mark S.
Walder, Jr. Stephen J.
LandOfFree
Mixed thermoelectric cooling apparatus and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Mixed thermoelectric cooling apparatus and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mixed thermoelectric cooling apparatus and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2850768