Ammunition and explosives – Shells – With secondary shells
Reexamination Certificate
2003-09-05
2004-07-27
Jordan, Charles T. (Department: 3644)
Ammunition and explosives
Shells
With secondary shells
Reexamination Certificate
active
06766746
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to ordnance, and more particularly to ordnance that can be adapted to a variety of missions after the ordnance has been launched.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Historically, strike and support weapons have been designed to kill a specific target class such as hard point targets (e.g., power plants, aircraft shelters, etc.) using kill mechanisms or employment techniques that have very limited effectiveness against other types of target classes to include distributed area and armored targets. As the number of target classes has increased, so has the number of different ordnance payloads. Over time, this has resulted in the development of numerous specialized weapons, some of which require different launch platforms.
In addition to target evolution, recent conflicts have emphasized the need to achieve operation objectives with a minimum impact to the surrounding area. Tactical situations requiring the complete destruction of targets are becoming less and less frequent. Rather, the trend is toward a measured response. For example, in many cases, forces are moving through a hostile area so rapidly that it is only necessary to neutralize the threat and not destroy the area's infrastructure (e.g., roads, bridges, power sources, etc.) that primarily benefits an innocent population. Furthermore, there are the issues associated with friendly, dud sub munitions left in the area. Still, in other cases, it is necessary to disable an area by shutting down a infrastructure for a specified period of time. In this scenario, a measured amount of damage must be brought to bear on a precise pressure point such as a single generator in a power plant or a power distribution switching station. If too much of the power plant is destroyed, an excessive shut down would occur and the strategic objective would not be met. In still other scenarios, the presence of civilians, hospitals or historic/religious sites in close proximity to the intended target means that collateral damage must be minimized. Lastly, the neutralization of sites containing weapons of mass destruction presents a most formidable challenge. Too much damage could cause a release of lethal chemicals/agents into an area inhabited by innocent civilians or even one's own troops.
All of the above-described scenarios call for a weapon that can deliver a measured lethal dose with sufficient precision to kill only the intended target(s). At the same time, large targets that must be totally destroyed will always exist. These targets call for large, non-nuclear payloads, most of which are delivered by cruise missiles or manned aircraft. Thus, future war fighting needs must focus on the ability to defeat various size targets with various levels of attack strength. In all cases, target destruction with minimal collateral damage demands that the ordnance penetrate its target prior to destruction.
The above-described goals of the various war fighting scenarios require a new class of ordnance with the ability to adapt to different types of attacks and different magnitudes of attack strength in response to the key vulnerabilities of a particular target. Such a mission responsive ordnance would reduce the need for target specific weapons and would provide a more robust ordnance capability not easily outdated by target evolution or modifications to tactics.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a mission responsive ordnance.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a mission responsive ordnance that can be adapted to different kinds of attacks.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a mission responsive ordnance that can be adapted to different magnitudes of attack strength.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a mission responsive ordnance designed to penetrate its target in each of its attack modes.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a mission responsive ordnance that can operate in either a unitary or subdivided-munitions mode.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a mission responsive ordnance that can be delivered to its destination using current launch technology.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become more obvious hereinafter in the specification and drawings.
In accordance with the present invention, a mission responsive ordnance includes a plurality of projectiles arranged in a bundled configuration. The bundled configuration defines a substantially solid structure with each of the projectiles forming a geometric portion thereof. First means maintain the bundled configuration such that the first means and projectiles are coupled together to form, in a unitary mode of operation, an integral structural element that bears loads generated when the bundled configuration strikes and penetrates a target. Provided within the bundled configuration are second means for, in a sub-divided mode of operation, selectively rendering the first means inoperative before a target is struck so that the projectiles are released from the bundled configuration into a surrounding environment.
REFERENCES:
patent: 647546 (1900-04-01), Warren
patent: 1017928 (1912-02-01), Tocik
patent: 2809583 (1957-10-01), Ortynsky et al.
patent: 3981244 (1976-09-01), Adimari et al.
patent: 4036140 (1977-07-01), Korr et al.
patent: 4264045 (1981-04-01), Campbell
patent: 4342262 (1982-08-01), Romer et al.
patent: 4480552 (1984-11-01), Eckel et al.
patent: 4488489 (1984-12-01), Schoffl
patent: 4676167 (1987-06-01), Huber, Jr. et al.
patent: 4714020 (1987-12-01), Hertsgaard et al.
patent: 4726297 (1988-02-01), Bueno et al.
patent: 4750423 (1988-06-01), Nagabhushan
patent: 4770101 (1988-09-01), Robertson et al.
patent: 4793260 (1988-12-01), Kruse et al.
patent: 4899661 (1990-02-01), Kaelin
patent: 4920887 (1990-05-01), Frehaut et al.
patent: 4922826 (1990-05-01), Busch et al.
patent: 4960055 (1990-10-01), Dieval
patent: 5005483 (1991-04-01), Deffayet
patent: 5076171 (1991-12-01), Altenau et al.
patent: 5094170 (1992-03-01), Raynaud et al.
patent: 5107767 (1992-04-01), Schneider et al.
patent: 5147973 (1992-09-01), Ziemba
patent: 5440994 (1995-08-01), Alexander
patent: 5473988 (1995-12-01), Dion
patent: 5796031 (1998-08-01), Sigler
Canaday Michael M.
Fridley, Jr. Perry L.
Sewell Mark W.
Spivak Timothy L.
Bussan Matthew J.
Dineen Marguerite O.
Jordan Charles T.
Lofdahl Jordan
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of
LandOfFree
Mission responsive ordnance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Mission responsive ordnance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mission responsive ordnance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3194164