Data processing: software development – installation – and managem – Software program development tool – Testing or debugging
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-14
2003-12-09
Chaki, Kakali (Department: 2124)
Data processing: software development, installation, and managem
Software program development tool
Testing or debugging
C717S130000, C714S047300
Reexamination Certificate
active
06662358
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to an improved data processing system and, in particular, to a method and apparatus for optimizing performance in a data processing system. Still more particularly, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for a software program development tool for enhancing performance of a software program through software profiling.
2. Description of Related Art
In analyzing and enhancing performance of a data processing system and the applications executing within the data processing system, it is helpful to know which software modules within a data processing system are using system resources. Effective management and enhancement of data processing systems requires knowing how and when various system resources are being used. Performance tools are used to monitor and examine a data processing system to determine resource consumption as various software applications are executing within the data processing system. For example, a performance tool may identify the most frequently executed modules and instructions in a data processing system, or may identify those modules which allocate the largest amount of memory or perform the most I/O requests. Hardware performance tools may be built into the system or added at a later point in time. Software performance tools also are useful in data processing systems, such as personal computer systems, which typically do not contain many, if any, built-in hardware performance tools.
One known software performance tool is a trace tool. A trace tool may use more than one technique to provide trace information that indicates execution flows for an executing program. One technique keeps track of particular sequences of instructions by logging certain events as they occur, so-called event-based profiling technique. For example, a trace tool may log every entry into, and every exit from, a module, subroutine, method, function, or system component. Alternately, a trace tool may log the requester and the amounts of memory allocated for each memory allocation request. Typically, a time-stamped record is produced for each such event. Corresponding pairs of records similar to entry-exit records also are used to trace execution of arbitrary code segments, starting and completing I/O or data transmission, and for many other events of interest.
In order to improve performance of code generated by various families of computers, it is often necessary to determine where time is being spent by the processor in executing code, such efforts being commonly known in the computer processing arts as locating “hot spots.” Ideally, one would like to isolate such hot spots at the instruction and/or source line of code level in order to focus attention on areas which might benefit most from improvements to the code.
Another trace technique involves periodically sampling a program's execution flows to identify certain locations in the program in which the program appears to spend large amounts of time. This technique is based on the idea of periodically interrupting the application or data processing system execution at regular intervals, so-called sample-based profiling. At each interruption, information is recorded for a predetermined length of time or for a predetermined number of events of interest. For example, the program counter of the currently executing thread, which is a process that is part of the larger program being profiled, may be recorded during the intervals. These values may be resolved against a load map and symbol table information for the data processing system at post-processing time, and a profile of where the time is being spent may be obtained from this analysis.
For example, isolating such hot spots to the instruction level permits compiler writers to find significant areas of suboptimal code generation at which they may thus focus their efforts to improve code generation efficiency. Another potential use of instruction level detail is to provide guidance to the designer of future systems. Such designers employ profiling tools to find characteristic code sequences and/or single instructions that require optimization for the available software for a given type of hardware.
There are often costs associated with measuring a system in that the measurement itself perturbs the system. This effect is well understood in the study of elementary particle physics and is known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. With software tracing, the cost associated with the tracing can severely affect the system being profiled. The effect can range from disruption of the cache and the instruction pipeline to more mundane effects such as the overhead associated with the tracing.
Continuous event-based profiling has limitations. For example, continuous event-based profiling is expensive in terms of performance (an event per entry and per exit), which can and often does perturb the resulting view of performance. Additionally, this technique is not always available because it requires the static or dynamic insertion of entry/exit events into the code. This insertion of events is sometimes not possible or is often difficult. For example, if source code is unavailable for the to-be-instrumented code, event-based profiling may not be feasible. However, it is possible to instrument an interpreter of the source code to obtain event-base profiling information without changing the source code.
On the other hand, sample-based profiling provides only a “flat view” of system performance while providing the benefits of reduced cost and reduced dependence on hooking-capability. Further, sample-based techniques do not identify where the time is spent in many small and seemingly unrelated functions or in situations in which no clear hot spot is apparent. Without an understanding of the program structure, it is not clear with a “flat” profile how to determine where the performance improvements can be obtained.
Therefore, it would be advantageous to provide a system that combines the benefits of event-based profiling with the benefits of reduced system perturbation in sample-based profiling.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method and system for monitoring performance of a program is provided. A trace record containing a call stack associated with the program is periodically generated. An occurrence of a selected event or a timer interrupt is detected, and in response, an execution context sample is obtained that contains a process identifier, a thread identifier, a program counter, and a stack pointer. A trace record containing the execution context sample data is generated. During post-processing, the execution context samples are compared with a call stack to identify the routine associated with the execution sample data.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4520441 (1985-05-01), Bandoh et al.
patent: 4703417 (1987-10-01), Morganti et al.
patent: 4841439 (1989-06-01), Nishikawa et al.
patent: 4866599 (1989-09-01), Morganti et al.
patent: 4868738 (1989-09-01), Kish et al.
patent: 5003458 (1991-03-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: 5047919 (1991-09-01), Sterling et al.
patent: 5355487 (1994-10-01), Keller et al.
patent: 5408650 (1995-04-01), Arsenault
patent: 5611061 (1997-03-01), Yasuda
patent: 5613118 (1997-03-01), Heisch et al.
patent: 5764944 (1998-06-01), Hwang et al.
patent: 5768500 (1998-06-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 5784554 (1998-07-01), Hsiung
patent: 5802371 (1998-09-01), Meier
patent: 5828883 (1998-10-01), Hall
patent: 5928369 (1999-07-01), Keyser et al.
patent: 5933640 (1999-08-01), Dion
patent: 5940871 (1999-08-01), Goyal et al.
patent: 5948112 (1999-09-01), Shimada et al.
patent: 6002872 (1999-12-01), Alexander, III et al.
patent: 6055492 (2000-04-01), Alexander, III et al.
patent: 6077312 (2000-06-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6158024 (2000-12-01), Mandal
patent: 6282701 (2001-08-01), Wygodny et al.
patent: 6332117 (2001-12-01), Berry et al.
patent: 6349406 (2002-02-01), Levine et al.
International Business Machines; Data Structure and Insertion Algorithm for Representing Asynchronous Occurrences for Visualizat
Berry Robert Francis
Levine Frank Eliot
Chaki Kakali
International Business Machines - Corporation
Leeuwen Leslie A. Van
Nichols Michael R.
Wood William H.
LandOfFree
Minimizing profiling-related perturbation using periodic... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Minimizing profiling-related perturbation using periodic..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Minimizing profiling-related perturbation using periodic... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3103779