Surgery – Specula – Retractor
Reexamination Certificate
1996-12-23
2001-11-27
Smith, Jeffrey A. (Department: 3732)
Surgery
Specula
Retractor
C600S231000, C600S232000, C600S234000, C600S235000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06322500
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive or video assisted surgical procedures are being developed to reduce trauma, surgically induced complications, and costs associated with a lengthened hospital stay. One common, and costly operative procedure in the US is coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), therefore, considerable attention has been given to establishing procedures for performing CABG surgery as a minimally invasive operation. Two basic approaches are currently being investigated by cardiac surgeons:
CABG (and other heart) operations on an arrested heart with percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); and
CABG procedures on a beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass.
There are certain advantages to the second approach in that CPB is known to be associated with some complications that can occur in open heart surgery. However, surgery on a beating heart is technically difficult, especially when performed through a small incision between ribs. Thus, there is a need to facilitate CABG surgery on a beating heart performed through an incision. A common CABG procedure is a graft between the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. While several other coronary arteries may be treated by CABG, and other vessels can be grafted to the LAD, a LIMA-LAD graft will be discussed below as illustrative of the invention.
To access and work on the LAD while the heart is beating requires clamping or immobilizing at least a portion of the heart. Previously surgeons have used hand held surgical devices for limiting some motion of the heart. However, these devices are not particularly effective in limiting the motion of the heart and they require that an assistant place at least one hand near the surgical site. Other devices provide retractor assemblies for retracting tissue around a surgical opening to provide a sufficiently large access for surgery, and further provide mechanisms whereby retractor blades, used to pull back organs or tissue, or other surgical implements are attached to the retractor assembly. The retractor itself generally consists of a frame which fits or is assembled about a perimeter of the opening.
However, the implements of these assemblies do not have complete access to the surgical field. In other words, the mechanisms which attach the implements to the retractor assemblies allow only limited freedom of movement. Thus, if a surgeon uses such a configuration and adds further specialized surgical implements, the limited freedom of movement might complicate the surgery. For example, when a surgeon creates an incision for heart surgery and places a retractor, the heart is still covered with the pericardial membrane, an opaque tissue, and the surgeon can not clearly determine the location of the artery of interest at this point in the surgery. Thus, if the surgeon wants to attach a device to the retractor to locally limit the motion of the heart, the surgeon is required to estimate the location of the artery of interest and place the retractor and device accordingly.
Upon removing the opaque tissue and discovering the actual location of the cardiac artery, it may be necessary to reposition both the surgical implements and the retractor. To disassemble and re-configure a retractor and associated surgical implements takes time, and puts the patient at risk of complications.
Therefore, there is a need for a more versatile retractor assembly with attached surgical implements that have greater and more flexible access to the surgical field. There is also a need for surgical implements that are more effective in limiting the motion of the heart and do not require an assistant to place a hand near the surgical site.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a surgical retractor apparatus, and a related method, for holding an incision open so that a surgeon can operate on tissue under direct vision.
Another object of this invention is to provide tools and methods for use with the above retractor apparatus which will stop blood flow temporarily in selected arteries, to enable the surgeon to visualize the surgical site.
Another object of this invention is to provide tools and methods for use with the above retractor apparatus which limit the motion of a patient's heart locally, leaving the remainder of the heart to beat normally.
Another object of the invention is provide further tools and methods for use with the above retractor apparatus to assist in a surgical procedure.
The present invention encompasses novel tools and a tool-holding retractor assembly. The retractor assembly spreads an incision and holds the incision open. At least one extension device, having a tool holder on one end, attaches to the assembly. The holder includes a selectively locking multi-axis adjustable mounting element adapted to grip a tool shaft. The mounting element acts as a universal mounting providing rotational and sliding movement of the tool shaft, while the extension device adjusts to position the tool holder peripherally of the surgical field. Once the retractor is placed, the extension device provides full access to regions below the incision, so the retractor need not be re-positioned for the surgeon to position a tool at a chosen site in the surgical field. The extension device allows the surgeon to chose the insertion point and positioning angle of the tool shaft. Furthermore, the tools are designed for insertion over the edge of an incision.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1094575 (1914-04-01), Joutras
patent: 1839726 (1932-01-01), Arnold
patent: 2070670 (1937-02-01), Marshall
patent: 2438646 (1948-03-01), Pulliam
patent: 3522799 (1970-08-01), Gauthier
patent: 3572326 (1971-03-01), Jensen
patent: 3724449 (1973-04-01), Gauthier
patent: 3965890 (1976-06-01), Gauthier
patent: 4010741 (1977-03-01), Gauthier
patent: 4421107 (1983-12-01), Estes et al.
patent: 4573452 (1986-03-01), Greenberg
patent: 4852552 (1989-08-01), Chaux
patent: 4865019 (1989-09-01), Phillips
patent: 4993862 (1991-02-01), Pelta
patent: 5052374 (1991-10-01), Alvarez-Jacinto
patent: 5133724 (1992-07-01), Wilson, Jr. et al.
patent: 5167223 (1992-12-01), Koros et al.
patent: 5224680 (1993-07-01), Greenstein et al.
patent: 5231974 (1993-08-01), Giglio et al.
patent: 5263956 (1993-11-01), Nobles
patent: 5299563 (1994-04-01), Seton
patent: 5304194 (1994-04-01), Chee et al.
patent: 5425705 (1995-06-01), Evard et al.
patent: 5429121 (1995-07-01), Gadelius
patent: 5433700 (1995-07-01), Peters
patent: 5437266 (1995-08-01), McPherson et al.
patent: 5452733 (1995-09-01), Sterman et al.
patent: 5458574 (1995-10-01), Machold et al.
patent: 5501698 (1996-03-01), Roth et al.
patent: 5503617 (1996-04-01), Jako
patent: 5520610 (1996-05-01), Giglio et al.
patent: 5697891 (1997-12-01), Hori
patent: 5730757 (1998-03-01), Benetti et al.
patent: 5755660 (1998-05-01), Tyagi
patent: 5782746 (1998-07-01), Wright
patent: 5836311 (1998-11-01), Borst et al.
patent: 5875782 (1999-03-01), Ferrari et al.
patent: 5894843 (1999-04-01), Benetti et al.
patent: 0 396 525 A1 (1990-11-01), None
patent: 0 791 330 (1997-08-01), None
patent: 168216 (1921-09-01), None
patent: 2218912 A (1989-11-01), None
patent: 2233561 (1991-01-01), None
patent: WO 95/15715 (1995-06-01), None
patent: WO 96/05773 (1996-02-01), None
patent: 97/10753 (1997-03-01), None
patent: WO 97/40738 (1997-11-01), None
Greenspun, Harry G. et al., “Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB); Surgical Techniques and Anesthetic Considerations”,Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 10, No. 4 (Jun. 1996) pp 507-509.
Fackler, Martin L., “Extending the Usefulness of Self-Retaining Retraction”,The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 129 (Jun. 1975) pp. 712-715.
Brochure: “Beating Heart Bypass, A New Approach”, CardioThoracic Systems, Cupertino, California 95014 ©1996.
Stevens, John H. et al., “Port-Access Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Proposed Surgical Method”,J. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg(1996) vol. 111, pp 567-573.
Schwartz, Daniel S. et al., “Minimally Invasive Cardiopulmonary Bypass with CardioP
Beane Richard
Davis Bill
Ek Steven W.
McCarthy Gary
Sikora George
Lahive & Cockfield LLP
Lauro, Esq. Peter C.
Rikkers, Esq. David J.
Smith Jeffrey A.
University of Massachusetts
LandOfFree
Minimally invasive surgical apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Minimally invasive surgical apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Minimally invasive surgical apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2605430