Electrical audio signal processing systems and devices – Electro-acoustic audio transducer – Microphone capsule only
Reexamination Certificate
1997-03-19
2003-04-15
Le, Huyen (Department: 2643)
Electrical audio signal processing systems and devices
Electro-acoustic audio transducer
Microphone capsule only
C381S368000, C381S191000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06549632
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a microphone provided with a vibrational noise reducing means.
DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
In a microphone, particularly, a portable microphone, the vibrational noise generated by vibrations propagated from a unit case of a microphone often poses a problem. The noise is generated because, when the unit case of a microphone is displaced in a certain direction, mass of a vibrating system including a diaphragm tends to stop at an original position.
In the microphone, a microphone unit is stored in a unit case. The microphone unit is roughly divided into a vibration portion and a conversion portion (a fixed portion) which electrically acts on the vibration portion to convert the vibration into an electrical signal. The output of an electrical signal caused by the sound wave of the microphone relies on the relative displacement or relative speed of the vibration portion and the conversion portion. The relative displacement or relative speed of the vibration portion and the conversion portion are generated not only by the sound wave but also by the vibrations propagated from the unit case.
A typical microphone for obtaining a signal output by the relative displacement is a condenser type microphone. On the other hand, a typical microphone for obtaining a signal output by the relative speed is a dynamic type microphone. Incidentally, the vibrational noise rely on the mass for setting a resonance frequency of a vibration system and its elasticity. From a viewpoint of control systems of the microphone, the mass of the vibration portion is in the relationship of mass control>resistance control>elasticity control.
Therefore, the magnitude of vibrational noise is generally in order of double directivity ribbon (or dynamic) microphone>non-directivity dynamic microphone>non-directivity condenser microphone. Out of portable microphone, in a single directivity dynamic microphone, particularly, the vibrational noise poses a problem as a handling noise.
The handling noises include the vibrational noise of a low frequency component like a sound “pon-pon” generated when the microphone moves so as to pat the thumb of the hand which holes the microphone, and the vibrational noise of a relatively high frequency component like a sound “kasa-kasa” generated when the thumb rubs on the microphone. The noise of the low frequency component has the directivity of cos &thgr; with respect to the vibration axis of the diaphragm, but the noise of the high frequency component has not specific directivity since it is generated by the solid propagation of the channel consisting of unit case→elastic support material→microphone unit.
Means for reducing (preventing) the vibrational noise so far known include a method for mechanically isolating vibrations by the shock mount, and a method for offsetting the vibrational noise by mounting a unit for detecting the vibrational noise in addition to a normal microphone unit.
First, the former shock mount method will be explained. This is a method for isolating vibrations of the microphone unit using a viscoelastic body as gum when the microphone unit is mounted on the unit case, for example, as shown in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 1-197000.
On the other hand, in the latter method for offsetting the vibrational noise, for example, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,835,735, there is used, for a displacement proportional type microphone unit, a displacement proportional type vibration detection unit is likewise used, and in the case of a speed proportional type microphone unit, a speed proportional type vibration detection unit is likewise used, whereby signal outputs of both the units are subtracted to reduce the vibrational noise.
The vibration isolation effect in the former shock mount method relies on the resonance frequency and the resonance sharpness of the vibration system, and the resonance frequency is lowered whereby the frequency band having the vibration isolation effect can be widened.
However, when the resonance frequency is lowered, even in the steady state, the microphone unit is displaced from the normal position due to the gravity. If the strong shock is applied to the unit case from outside, the displacement of the microphone becomes extremely large, and the microphone unit collides with the unit case to sometimes generate a big shock sound.
With respect to the resonance sharpness, the higher the resonance sharpness, the larger the vibration isolation effect at the high frequency. However, the vibrational noise at the resonance frequency becomes increased as compared with the case without support of vibration isolation. From the foregoing, when the resonance frequency is lowered or the resonance sharpness is increased, immoderately, the practical trouble is brought forth.
Further, out of the handling noises, the relatively high frequency components generated when the thumb rubs on the unit case relies on the solid propagation as previously mentioned. Therefore, in the case where the sectional area of the shock mount is large, it is not possible to prevent the vibrational noise in the high band.
According to the latter method for offsetting the vibrational noise, signal output levels and phases of the normal microphone unit and the vibration detection unit are adjusted and subtracted whereby the vibrational noise can be reduced extremely satisfactorily. In practice, however, it is difficult to make the signal outputs of both the units the same in the wide frequency band.
That is, even if the microphone unit has the same construction as that of the vibration detection unit, in the diaphragm of the microphone unit, air normally called the additive mass which vibrates the same as the diaphragm is present. On the other hand, the vibration detection unit is surrounded by a cylinder member so as to prevent the sound wave from entering. Even if the cylinder member is vibrated by the sound wave, the diaphragm of the vibration detection unit is to operate in a manner such that the mass equivalently decreases.
Thereby, in the vibration detection unit, the resonance frequency of the diaphragm rises and the signal output level lowers, and a phase difference occurs in the signal output of the microphone unit. In consideration of the above point, in the aforesaid U.S. Pat. No. 2,835,735, the frequency to be cancelled is limited to a low sound band, and in the frequency band in excess of a middle sound band, the shock mount is used to reduce the vibrational noise.
However, naturally, it is necessary that the adjustment of the signal levels output from both the units and the phases thereof are still done very minutely. Further, it cannot be denied that the balance is lost for some factor (for example, a rise in temperature), in which case, the vibrational noise is likely increased. Further, since fundamentally, the vibration detection unit is required in addition to the microphone unit, it cannot be denied that the cost is high, the weight increases, and the device becomes large in size.
In Japanese Patent No. 57-9279 as a separate prior art, as shown in
FIG. 8
, in housing a diaphragm
2
and a magnetic circuit portion
3
as a conversion portion in a unit case
1
of a microphone, the magnetic circuit portion
3
side is supported on the unit case
1
through an elastic element
4
such as rubber.
That is, the diaphragm
2
and the magnetic circuit portion
3
are vibrated in the same direction with respect to the vibration of the unit case
1
to thereby not to generate a relative speed between the diaphragm
2
and the magnetic circuit portion
3
. Since with respect to the sound wave, the mass of the magnetic circuit portion
3
is extremely large relative to the mass of the vibration plat
2
, the magnetic circuit portion
3
is not vibrated by the sound wave but only the diaphragm
2
is vibrated. Therefore, the relative speed occurs therebetween and the signal output is obtained by the voice.
In this method, it is required that the resonance frequency of the diaphragm
2
is made the same as tha
Akino Hiroshi
Green Bob
Kondo Kazuhisa
Okita Shioto
Uzawa Shigeru
Kabushiki Kaisha Audio-Technica
Le Huyen
Welsh & Katz Ltd.
LandOfFree
Microphone does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Microphone, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microphone will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3087264