Surgery – Reproduction and fertilization techniques
Reexamination Certificate
1999-04-08
2001-02-27
Hindenburg, Max (Department: 3736)
Surgery
Reproduction and fertilization techniques
Reexamination Certificate
active
06193647
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally concerns handling of embryos. The invention also concerns handling of oocytes (prefertilized embryos). Embryo, as used herein, therefore encompasses oocytes as well as fertilized embryos. The invention more specifically concerns microfluidic handling of embryos for culturing, manipulation, and analysis.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technology assisted reproduction techniques in which embryos are handled independently from their mammalian biological source are growing in importance and frequency of use. Such techniques have great direct benefit to persons unable to have babies through unassisted sexual reproduction. The agricultural industries also increasingly rely upon such assisted reproduction techniques. Embryo manipulation is used in livestock reproduction to control such things as the faster genetic evolution of cattle and permitting the genetic characteristics of a single exceptional cow or bull to be passed on to far greater numbers of offspring than would be possible through unassisted sexual reproduction.
Livestock embryo manipulation is becoming more routine due to the development of gene manipulation, cloning, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. The overall goal of embryo manipulation in livestock is to increase production efficiency, especially with regard to reproduction, milk production or production of specific milk components, lean tissue growth with reduced fat content and decreased susceptibility to specific diseases. Embryo transfer is also used to introduce or rescue valuable germplasm and propagate rare breeding animals such as endangered exotic species.
Expense and relatively low success rates place significant burdens on the use of these assisted reproduction techniques for humans as well as livestock. In human reproduction such expense and failure adds emotional as well as economic burdens. In addition, safeguards against failures often result in unwanted or unmanageable multiple births, as well as additional stored embryos which require maintenance and additional difficult decision making at some later point in time. Expense is the primary concern in livestock reproduction.
Failure rates in reproduction techniques as well as testing and other embryo handling techniques are attributable primarily to the significant handling and manipulation of embryos in executing these techniques. Animal reproductive technologies have advanced in recent years, but the physical tools used in animal reproduction have not changed significantly. Fine-bore glass pipets are still one of the basic tools of the embryologist. Using standard petri dishes, procedures such as in vitro maturation of eggs (IVM), in vitro fertilization, and embryo culture (EC) require picking up and placing individual eggs and embryos several times for each procedure.
Such handling and movement from one petri dish to another provides significant potential for damage or contamination. Perhaps more important, though, is the failure of a stationary embryo in a petri dish to simulate the corresponding natural biological reproduction condition. Some efforts have been made to move embryos in petri dishes via agitation of the dish, but this is a haphazard approach. Expense is also created here due to the relatively large amount of biological medium required for the manual petri dish conventional embryo handling methods. Bovine embryos are individually handled with pipets and large, expensive manipulators. Large quantities of biological medium including growth agents for human embryo culturing renders the corresponding in vitro procedure even more expensive. Livestock growth factors, for example, have costs exceeding $200 per 50 &mgr;g.
Such static culture systems also fail to allow for changing the milieu in the culture medium as the embryo develops. Current culture systems with flowing medium have culture chambers as small as 0.2 to 0.5 ml. However, the culture volumes are greater than needed and medium is replenished too quickly. The endogenous growth factors that enhance development are diluted out and washed away. The large volumes of medium required substantially increase costs when expensive growth factors, such as IGF-II ($200 per 50 &mgr;g) are used. In addition, known systems cannot track individual embryos.
Thus, there is a need for an improved embryo handling device and method which addresses problems in known embryo handling techniques. An improved embryo handling device and method should provide for an improved simulation of natural conditions. It should also provide a building block upon which larger and/or more powerful and accurate instruments may be based, such as embryo culturing systems, embryo analysis systems, embryo storage systems, and similar systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
These needs are met or exceeded by the present microfluidic embryo handling device and method. The invention simulates biological rotating of embryos. An embryo fluidic channel moves an embryo inserted therein with fluid, and is sized on the same scale as the particular type of embryo or embryos to be handled. The sizing and fluid communication produces a simulated biological rotating of embryos. In addition, the fluid flow with and around the embryo or embryos prevents stagnation, reducing the likelihood of the embryo or embryos developing “bed sores”.
The invention also permits the biological medium fluid to be altered gradually, having significant advantages compared to repeatedly manually transferring an embryo from one medium to another medium in a pipet or petri dish. Gradual changes avoid the shock from sudden changes in local environment. The microfluidic system of the invention further permits the co-culturing of an embryo with other embryos, co-culturing of an embryo or embryos with cells upstream of the embryo(s), and maintenance of a separate control culture that shares a common biological medium with a subject embryo(s) thereby ensuring that test embryos see the same environmental conditions as the subject embryo(s).
REFERENCES:
patent: 4676274 (1987-06-01), Brown
patent: 4832759 (1989-05-01), Curtis et al.
patent: 5296375 (1994-03-01), Kricka et al.
patent: 5304487 (1994-04-01), Wilding et al.
patent: 5376252 (1994-12-01), Ekstrom et al.
patent: 5427946 (1995-06-01), Kricka et al.
patent: 5486335 (1996-01-01), Wilding et al.
patent: 5498392 (1996-03-01), Wilding et al.
patent: 5512476 (1996-04-01), Gordon
patent: 5635358 (1997-06-01), Wilding et al.
patent: 5637469 (1997-06-01), Wilding et al.
patent: 5691194 (1997-11-01), Gordon
patent: 5744366 (1998-04-01), Kricka et al.
patent: 5757482 (1998-05-01), Fuchs et al.
patent: 5779868 (1998-07-01), Parce et al.
patent: 5989835 (1999-11-01), Dunlay et al.
patent: 9115750 (1991-10-01), None
patent: 9322053 (1993-11-01), None
patent: 9322055 (1993-11-01), None
patent: 9747390 (1997-12-01), None
M. Lane and D.K. Gardner, “Selection of Viable Mouse Blastocysts Prior to Transfer using a Metabolic Criterion”,Human Reproduction, vol. 21, No. 9, 1996, pp. 1975-1978.
P.C.H. Li and D.J. Harrison, “Transport, Manipulation, and Reaction of Biological Cells On-Chip Using Electrokinetic Effects”,Analytical Chemistry, vol. 69, No. 8, pp. 1564-1568, 1997.
N.G. Chan, J.T. Lyman, S.J. Choi, H.C. Zeringue, I.K. Glasgow, D.J. Beebe, M.B. Wheeler, “Development of an Embryo Transport and Analysis System: Material Biocompatibility”,Theriogenology, vol. 51, No. 1, p. 234, (abstr.), 1999.
S.J. Choi, I. Glasgow, H. Zeringue, D.J. Beebe, M.B. Wheeler, “Development of Microelectromechanical Systems to Analyze Individual Mammalian Embryos: Embryro Biocompatibility”,Biol. Reprod., Vol 58 (Suppl. 1), p. 96 (abstr.), 1998.
J.M. Lim, B.C. Reggio, R.A. Godke, W. Hansel; “A Continuous Flow, Perifusion Culture System for 8-to 16-Cell Bovine Embryos Derived from In Vitro Culture”,Theriogenology, vol. 46, pp. 1441-1450, 1996.
J.A. Pruitt, D.W. Forrest, R.C. Burghardt, J.W. Evans, D.C. Kraemer, “Viability and Ultrastructure of Equine Embryos Following Culture in a Static or Dynamic System”,Journal of Reproduction and Fertilit
Beebe David J.
Glasgow Ian K.
Wheeler Matthew B.
Greer Burns & Crain Ltd.
Hindenburg Max
Szmal Brian
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
LandOfFree
Microfluidic embryo and/or oocyte handling device and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Microfluidic embryo and/or oocyte handling device and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microfluidic embryo and/or oocyte handling device and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2583325