Electric lamp or space discharge component or device manufacturi – Process – With assembly or disassembly
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-26
2004-02-24
Clinger, James (Department: 2821)
Electric lamp or space discharge component or device manufacturi
Process
With assembly or disassembly
C313S631000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06695664
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates to microdischarge devices and, in particular, new structures for light emitting devices and low-cost methods of producing ultraviolet or visible light from thin sheets.
It has long been known that electrical discharges are efficient sources of light and, today, gas discharge lamps (including fluorescent sources, and metal-halide, sodium, or mercury arc lamps) account for most of the world's light-generating capacity (several billion watts on a continuous basis). Most of these devices are, unfortunately, bulky and frequently have fragile quartz or glass envelopes and require expensive mounting fixtures. In addition to general lighting, discharges produce ultraviolet and visible light for other purposes such as germicidal applications (disinfecting surfaces and tissue), cleaning electronic and optical surfaces in manufacturing, and activating light-sensitive molecules for medical treatments and diagnostics.
Although microdischarges were demonstrated by A. D. White in 1959, only recently were microdischarge devices fabricated in silicon by techniques developed in the integrated-circuit industry. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,027, the first microdischarge devices made in silicon had a cylindrical microcavity that served as the cathode of the device. The semiconductor cathode was affixed to a copper heat sink with conductive epoxy. The anode for the microdischarge device was typically a metal film such as Ni/Cr. A thin dielectric layer deposited onto the silicon electrically insulates the cathode from the anode. When the microcavity is filled with the desired gas and the appropriate voltage imposed between the anode and cathode, a discharge is ignited in the microcavity.
Microdischarges have several distinct advantages over conventional discharges. Since the diameter of single cylindrical microdischarge devices, for example, is typically less than 400-500 &mgr;m, each device offers the spatial resolution that is desirable for a pixel in a display. Also, the small physical dimensions of microdischarges allows them to operate at pressures much higher than those accessible to conventional, macroscopic discharges. When the diameter of a cylindrical microdischarge device is, for example, on the order of 200-300 &mgr;m or less, the device will operate at pressures as high as atmospheric pressure and beyond. In contrast, standard fluorescent lamps, for example, operate at pressures typically less than 1% of atmospheric pressure.
Despite their applications in several areas, including optoelectronics and sensors, silicon microdischarge devices have several drawbacks. For example, the annular metal anodes used in early microdischarge devices have short lifetimes because of sputtering. After operating for as little as several hours, damage to the anode is visible and devices frequently fail after only tens of hours of operation. Optical emission from metal atoms evaporated from the anode is easily detected prior to failure of the device. One solution is to replace the metals tested to date with a more robust material, such as polycrystalline silicon or tungsten. However, these materials increase the fabrication cost and difficulty, do not yield significantly increased output power and may not yield significantly improved device lifetime.
Furthermore, silicon is brittle, comparatively high in cost, and single wafers are limited in size (12″ in diameter currently). In addition, silicon fabrication techniques, although well-established, are labor and time intensive and, therefore, not suitable for low-cost applications. Therefore, a number of potential applications of microdischarge devices, not presently accessible with silicon (or other) semiconductor technology, could be pursued if low-cost, flexible microdischarge arrays, requiring voltages no higher than that available in common wall sockets, were available.
Two other drawbacks of previous microdischarge devices and arrays concern the inefficiency of extracting optical power from deep cylindrical cavities and the difficulty in scaling the size of arrays. If the cylindrical cathode for a microdischarge is too deep, it will be difficult for photons produced below the surface of the cathode to escape. Another problem arises in fabricating arrays of microdischarge devices is that devices at the perimeter of the array ignite preferentially and arrays as small as 10×10 are difficult to ignite at all.
BRIEF SUMMARY
In view of the above, novel microdischarge devices and fabrication methods are provided.
In one embodiment, the discharge device comprises a first electrode, a second electrode on the first electrode, a dielectric layer between the first and second electrodes, and a cavity that extends through the first electrode and the dielectric layer. The cavity may contain a gas.
The first electrode may comprise a screen or the dielectric layer may comprise a plurality of films, at least one of the films having a dielectric constant different from at least another of the films.
The first and second electrodes may comprise an optically transmissive material. An optically transmissive sealing material may seal the cavity and an optically transmissive protective material may be disposed between the sealing material and the cavity.
In another embodiment, an array of the discharge devices may comprise a plurality of discharge devices electrically connected together. When a minimum voltage sufficient to cause discharge of at least 10 of the devices is applied, then a voltage difference between the first and second electrode at every cavity of the at least 10 devices has a voltage difference of no more than 20% of an average voltage difference between the first and second electrodes of the at least 10 devices.
The following figures and detailed description of the embodiments will more clearly demonstrate these and other advantages of the present invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5686789 (1997-11-01), Schoenbach et al.
patent: 5939829 (1999-08-01), Schoenbach et al.
patent: 6016027 (2000-01-01), DeTemple et al.
patent: 6082294 (2000-07-01), Simpson
patent: 6139384 (2000-10-01), DeTemple et al.
patent: 7192701 (1995-07-01), None
“High-Pressure Hollow Cathode Discharges;” Karl H. Schoenbach et al.; Physical Electronics Research Institute, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA; Jun. 30, 1997.
“Microdischarge Devices Fabricated in Silicon;” J.W. Frame et al.; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Everett Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA; Jun. 30, 1997; App. Phys. Lett. 71 (9), Sep. 1, 1997.
“Flexible Microdischarge Arrays: Metal/Polymer Devices;” S. -J. Park et al.; Laboratory for Optical Physics and Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA; May 17, 2000; Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, No. 2, Jul. 10, 2000.
“Emission of Excimer Radiation from Direct Current, High-Pressure Hollow Cathode Discharges;” Ahmed El-Habachi and Karl H. Schoenbach; Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Physical Research Institute, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA; Nov. 4, 1997; App. Phys. Lett. 72(1), Jan. 5, 1998.
Eden J. Gary
Park Sung-Jin
Wagner Clark J.
A Minh D
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione
Clinger James
LandOfFree
Microdischarge devices and arrays does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Microdischarge devices and arrays, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microdischarge devices and arrays will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3354148