Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Structurally defined web or sheet – Including variation in thickness
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-23
2004-06-22
Watkins, III, William P. (Department: 1772)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
Structurally defined web or sheet
Including variation in thickness
C428S156000, C428S172000, C428S073000, C428S072000, C428S913000, C345S107000, C204S606000, C359S296000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06753067
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The electrophoretic display is a non-emissive device based on the electrophoresis phenomenon influencing charged pigment particles suspended in a solvent. This general type of display was first proposed in 1969. An electrophoretic display typically comprises a pair of opposed, spaced-apart plate-like electrodes, with spacers predetermining a certain distance between the electrodes. One of the electrodes is typically transparent. A dispersion composed of a colored solvent and suspended charged pigment particles is enclosed between the two plates.
When a voltage difference is imposed between the two electrodes, the pigment particles migrate to one side by attraction to the plate of polarity opposite that of the pigment particles. Thus the color showing at the transparent plate may be determined by selectively charging the plates to be either the color of the solvent or the color of the pigment particles. Reversal of plate polarity will cause the particles to migrate back to the opposite plate, thereby reversing the color. Intermediate color density (or shades of grey) due to intermediate pigment density at the transparent plate may be obtained by controlling the plate charge through a range of voltages.
There are several types of electrophoretic displays available in the art, for example, the partition-type electrophoretic display (see M. A Hopper and V. Novotny, IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev., Vol ED 26, No. 8, pp 1148-1152 (1979)) and the microencapsulated electrophoretic display (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,804 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,026). In a partition-type electrophorectic display, there are partitions between the two electrodes for dividing the space into smaller cells in order to prevent undesired movements of the particles such as sedimentation. The microencapsulated electrophoretic display has a substantially two dimensional arrangement of microcapsules each having therein an electrophoretic composition of a dielectric fluid and a dispersion of charged pigment particles that visually contrast with the dielectric solvent.
Furthermore, an improved electrophoretic display (EPD) technology was recently disclosed in the co-pending applications, U.S. Ser. No. 09/518,488, filed on Mar. 3, 2000 pending, U.S. Ser. No. 09/759,212, filed on Jan. 11, 2001 pending, U.S. Ser. No. 09/606,654, filed on Jun. 28, 2000 pending and U.S. Ser. No. 09/784,972, filed on Feb. 25, 2001 pending, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The improved electrophoretic display comprises cells formed from microcups of well-defined shape, size, and aspect ratio and filled with charged pigment particles dispersed in a dielectric solvent.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Multifunctional UV curable compositions have been employed to fabricate the microcup array for the improved electrophoretic display. However, the microcup structure formed tends to be quite brittle. The internal stress in the cups due to the high degree of crosslinking and shrinkage often results in undesirable cracking and delamination of the microcups from the conductor substrate during demolding. The microcup array prepared from the multifunctional UV curable compositions also showed a poor flexure resistance.
It has now been found that resistance toward flexure or stress may be significantly reduced if a rubber component is incorporated into the microcup composition. Two other key properties: demoldability during microembossing and adhesion between the sealing layer and the microcups have also been considerably improved with the composition containing this additional rubber component.
Suitable rubber materials for this purpose include SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber), PBR (polybutadiene rubber), NBR (acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber), SBS (styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer), SIS (styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymer), and their derivatives. Particularly useful are functionalized rubbers such as polybutadiene dimethacrylate (CN301 and CN302 from Sartomer, Ricacryl 3100 from Ricon Resins Inc.), graft (meth)acrylated hydrocarbon polymer (Ricacryl 3500 and Ricacryl 3801 from Ricon Resins, Inc.), and methacrylate terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymers (Hycar VTBNX 1300×33, 1300×43 from BF Goodrich).
REFERENCES:
patent: 3612758 (1971-10-01), Evans et al.
patent: 3668106 (1972-06-01), Ota
patent: 3697679 (1972-10-01), Hathaway
patent: 4071430 (1978-01-01), Liebert
patent: 4093534 (1978-06-01), Carter et al.
patent: 4285801 (1981-08-01), Chiang
patent: 4680103 (1987-07-01), Beilin Solomon et al.
patent: 4741988 (1988-05-01), Van der Zande et al.
patent: 4995718 (1991-02-01), Jachimowicz et al.
patent: 5276438 (1994-01-01), DiSanto et al.
patent: 5279511 (1994-01-01), DiSanto et al.
patent: 5380362 (1995-01-01), Schubert
patent: 5403518 (1995-04-01), Schubert
patent: 5573711 (1996-11-01), Hou et al.
patent: 5589100 (1996-12-01), Grasso et al.
patent: 5699097 (1997-12-01), Takayama et al.
patent: 5835174 (1998-11-01), Clikeman et al.
patent: 5914806 (1999-06-01), Gordon, II et al.
patent: 5930026 (1999-07-01), Jacobson et al.
patent: 5961804 (1999-10-01), Jacobson et al.
patent: 5976405 (1999-11-01), Clikeman et al.
patent: 6017584 (2000-01-01), Albert et al.
patent: 6037058 (2000-03-01), Clikeman et al.
patent: 6067185 (2000-05-01), Albert et al.
patent: 6111598 (2000-08-01), Faris
patent: 6113810 (2000-09-01), Hou et al.
patent: 6120588 (2000-09-01), Jacobson
patent: 6120839 (2000-09-01), Comiskey et al.
patent: 6172798 (2001-01-01), Albert et al.
patent: 6184856 (2001-02-01), Gordon, II et al.
patent: 6252624 (2001-06-01), Yuasa et al.
patent: 6312304 (2001-11-01), Duthaler et al.
patent: 6327072 (2001-12-01), Comiskey et al.
patent: 6337761 (2002-01-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 6392786 (2002-05-01), Albert
patent: 2001/0055000 (2001-12-01), Kanae et al.
patent: 2002/0018043 (2002-02-01), Nakanishi
patent: 1 089 118 (2001-04-01), None
patent: 1 195 603 (2002-04-01), None
patent: 59-171930 (1984-09-01), None
patent: 02284126 (1990-11-01), None
patent: 056653 (2001-02-01), None
patent: WO 99/56171 (1999-11-01), None
patent: WO 00/60410 (2000-10-01), None
patent: WO 01/67170 (2001-09-01), None
patent: WO 01/67170 (2001-09-01), None
PCT International Search Report dated Sep. 6, 2002.
Chan-Park, M., et al., “Process for Roll-to-Roll Manufacture of a Display by Synchronized Photolithographic Exposure on a Substrate Web”, Ser. No. 09/784,972 —filed Feb. 15, 2001.
Harvey, T.G., “Replication techniques for micro-optics”,SPIE Proc.—3099:76-82 (1997).
Hopper, M.A., et al., “An Electrophoretic Display, its Properties, Models and Addressing”,IEEE Trans. Electr. Dev.—26(8):1148-1152 (1979).
Liang, R.C. et al., “An Improved Transmissive or Reflective Liquid Crystal Display and Novel Process for its Manufacture”, Ser. No. 09/759,212—filed Jan. 11, 2001.
Liang, R.C., et al., “Manufacturing Process for Electrophoretic Display”, Ser. No. 09/606,654—filed Jun. 28, 2000.
Slafer, W.D., et al., “Continuous Manufacturing of Thin Cover Sheet Optical Media”,SPIE Proc.—1663:324-334 (1992).
Cominsky, B. et al., “An Electrophoretic Ink For All-Printed Reflective Eletronic Displays”, Letters To Nature, pp. 253-255 (1998).
Dalisa, A.L., “Electrophorectic Display Technology”,IEEE Transactions of Electron Devices, Jul. 1997, pp. 827-834.
Drzaic, P., “Liquid Crystal Dispersion”, The PDLC Paradigm, (1995), pp. 1-9.
Harbour, J.R. et al, “Subdivided Eletrophoretic Display”, Xerox Disclosure Journal, vol. 4, No. 6 (1979).
Lewis, J.C., et al. “Gravitational, Inter-Particle-Electrode Forces in Electrophorectic Display”, Proceedings of the S.I.D., vol. 18/3&4 (1977).
Murau, P., et al., “The Understanding and Elimination of Some Suspension Instabilities in an Electrophoretic Display”, J. Appl. Phys., 49(9), (1978).
Nakamura, E., et al., “Development of Electrophoretic Display Using Microcapsulated Suspension”, SID Digest, (1998), pp. 1014-1017.
Ota, I., et al., “Electrophoretic Image Display EPID Panel”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 1, No. 7, July. 1973.
Singer, B. and Dalisa, A.L., “An X-Y Addressable Electrophorectic Display”, Proceedi
Chan-Park Mary B.
Chen Xianhai
Liang Rong-Chang
Wang Xiaojia
Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP
SiPix Imaging Inc.
Watkins III William P.
LandOfFree
Microcup compositions having improved flexure resistance and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Microcup compositions having improved flexure resistance and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microcup compositions having improved flexure resistance and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3345223