Metropolitan area local access service system

Multiplex communications – Fault recovery – Bypass an inoperative switch or inoperative element of a...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S216000, C370S223000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08031589

ABSTRACT:
A local access fiber optical distribution network is disclosed in which a dedicated pair of diversely routed optical fibers is routed in the distribution network for each customer. In a preferred embodiment, a dual physical overlay ring core topology is used in the core. The distribution network includes working and protection logical path connectivity. No 802.1D Spanning Tree is required for recovery, providing resilience to any single network failure in any device or link, quick recovery times from failure, and a failure detection/recovery protocol that is not active on any devices other than the devices directly attached to the subscriber.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4871225 (1989-10-01), Schembri
patent: 5107490 (1992-04-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5418785 (1995-05-01), Olshansky et al.
patent: 5530782 (1996-06-01), Osaka et al.
patent: 5796501 (1998-08-01), Sotom et al.
patent: 5835696 (1998-11-01), Hess
patent: 5920410 (1999-07-01), Smith et al.
patent: 6088328 (2000-07-01), McKnight
patent: 6108300 (2000-08-01), Colie et al.
patent: 6205144 (2001-03-01), Mohrmann
patent: 6236640 (2001-05-01), Klink
patent: 6330229 (2001-12-01), Jain et al.
patent: 6415323 (2002-07-01), McCanne et al.
patent: 6470032 (2002-10-01), Dudziak et al.
patent: 6519399 (2003-02-01), Strong et al.
patent: 6539022 (2003-03-01), Virgile
patent: 6565269 (2003-05-01), Riis et al.
patent: 6654379 (2003-11-01), Grover et al.
patent: 6751191 (2004-06-01), Davar et al.
patent: 6766482 (2004-07-01), Yip et al.
patent: 6826158 (2004-11-01), Seaman et al.
patent: 6834056 (2004-12-01), Hayes
patent: 6963575 (2005-11-01), Sistanizadeh et al.
patent: 7009933 (2006-03-01), Gan
patent: 7126923 (2006-10-01), Yang et al.
patent: 7164698 (2007-01-01), Krishnamurthi et al.
patent: 7246168 (2007-07-01), Bales
patent: 7289428 (2007-10-01), Chow et al.
patent: 2003/0012129 (2003-01-01), Lee et al.
patent: 2003/0012238 (2003-01-01), Wu
patent: 2003/0016624 (2003-01-01), Bare
patent: 2003/0043736 (2003-03-01), Gonda
patent: 2003/0179700 (2003-09-01), Saleh et al.
patent: 2004/0081093 (2004-04-01), Haddock et al.
patent: 2006/0051090 (2006-03-01), Saniee et al.
patent: 0 538 853 (1993-04-01), None
patent: 0 987 857 (2000-03-01), None
Extreme Networks: “Extremere Software User Guide”, Software Version 6.1, Apr. 2000, Chapter 6 and Chapter 10.
Extreme Networks: “ExtremeWare Software User Guide”, Software Version 6.1, Apr. 2000, p. 1-1.
Extreme Networks: “ExtremeWare Software User Guide”, Software Version 6.1, Apr. 2000.
Yoshio Kajiyama et al., “An ATM VP-based Self-Healing Ring)” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Inc., New York, vol. 12, No. 1, 1994.
Extreme Networks, “ExtremeWare Software User Guide”, “Software Version 6.1”, Apr. 2000.
“Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, May 4, 2009, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 14, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/652,284”, Apr. 13, 2009, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Actin Mailed Jan. 18, 2008”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Maile Mar. 14, 2006”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Jun. 27, 2007”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Jul. 21, 2005”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Jul. 24, 2008”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Oct. 4, 2006”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Mar. 26, 2008”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2007”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action mailed Jul. 31, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action mailed Aug. 9, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action mailed Oct. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Nov. 3, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
“Office Action Mailed Jan. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Preliminary Amendment in Response to Office Action Dated Mar. 14, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment in Response to Office Action Dated Jun. 27, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Oct. 29, 2007, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Dec. 21, 2005, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment and Response to Final Office Action Dated Jul. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Oct. 24, 2008, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action Dated Oct. 4, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Mar. 30, 2007, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “In connection with the Amendment and RCE filed on Oct. 30, 2007 and response to OA dated Jan. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Jan. 21, 2008, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Divovo, “Response to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Jul. 28, 2008, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Response to Office Action and Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, May 2007, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Oct. 2007, Published in: US.
Andrew D. Dinovo, “Amendment in Response to Office Action Dated Jan. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Apr. 18, 2008, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Response to Jun. 23, 2004 Restriction Requirement in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Jul. 2004, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Amendment in Response to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Feb. 2007, Published in: US.
Andrew G. Dinovo, “Response to Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Nov. 2004, Published in: US.
Neugeboren O'Dowd PC, “Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/952,284”, Feb. 9, 2009, Published in: US.
Neugeboren O'Dowd PC, “Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474”, Apr. 3, 2009, Published in: US.
East Search Report, Apr. 10, 2009, 1 page.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/975,474, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2009, 13 pages.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Metropolitan area local access service system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Metropolitan area local access service system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Metropolitan area local access service system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4292421

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.