Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving antigen-antibody binding – specific binding protein...
Reexamination Certificate
2006-10-04
2010-10-12
Bunner, Bridget E (Department: 1646)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or...
Involving antigen-antibody binding, specific binding protein...
C530S350000, C530S387300, C435S320100, C435S325000, C435S348000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07811777
ABSTRACT:
The present invention relates to nucleotide sequences, including expressed sequence tags (ESTs), oligonucleotide probes, polypeptides, antibodies, vectors and host cells expressing, immunoadhesins, agonists and antagonists to patched-2.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4816567 (1989-03-01), Cabilly et al.
patent: 5225539 (1993-07-01), Winter
patent: 5844079 (1998-12-01), Ingham et al.
patent: 5932448 (1999-08-01), Tso et al.
patent: 6261786 (2001-07-01), Marigo et al.
patent: 0 879 888 (1998-11-01), None
patent: WO 95/18856 (1995-07-01), None
patent: WO 96/11260 (1996-04-01), None
patent: WO 97/45541 (1997-12-01), None
patent: WO 99/29854 (1999-06-01), None
Wells (1990) Biochemistry 29(37): 8509-8517.
Ngo et al (1994) “The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction, Chapter 14: Computational Complexity Protein Structure Prediction, and the Levinthal Paradox” pp. 433-440 and 492-495 only.
Bork (2000) Genome Research 10:398.
Skolnick et al (2000) Trends in Biotech. 18(1): 34.
Doerks et al (1998) Trends in Genetics 14(6): 248.
Smith et al (1997) Nature Biotechnology 15:1222.
Brenner (1999) Trends in Genetics 15(4): 132.
Bork et al (1996) Trends in Genetics 12(10): 425.
Wang et al. (1999) Nuc Acids Res. 27: 4609-4618.
Kaufman et al (1999) Blood 94: 3178-3184.
Campbell et al. (1997) Theriology 47(1): 63-72.
Boitani et al, 1993. Biology of Reproduction. 48: 761-767.
Burry, Richard W., “Specificity Controls for Immunocytochemical Methods”J. of Histochemistry&Cytochemistry48(2):163-165 (2000).
Van Regenmortel, M.H.V., “From absolute to exquisite specificity. Reflections on the fuzzy nature of species, specificity and antigenic sites”J. of Immunological Methods216:37-48 (1998).
U.S. Appl. No. 09/031,563, filed Feb. 26, 1998, Zhang et al.
Alcedo et al., “The Drosophila Smoothened Gene Encodes a Seven-Pass Membrane Protein, A Putative Receptor for the Hedgehog Signal.”Cell. 86:221-232 (1996).
Apelqvist et al., “Sonic Hedgehog Directs Specialised Mesoderm Differentiation in the Intestine and Pancreas.”Current Biology. 7(10):801-804 (Oct. 1, 1997).
Bellusci et al., “Involvement of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) in Mouse Embryonic Lung Growth and Morphogenesis.”Development. 124(1):53-63 (Jan. 1997).
Bitgood et al., “Hedgehog and Bmp genes are coexpressed at many diverse sites of cell-cell interaction in the mouse embryo”Developmental Biology172(1):126-138 (Nov. 1995).
Bitgood et al., “Sertoli Cell Signaling by Desert Hedgehog Regulates the Male Germline.”Current Biology. 6(3):298-304 (1996).
Bork, et al., “Go hunting in sequence databases but watch out for the traps”Trends in Genetics12(10):425-427 (Oct. 1996).
Bork, P., “Powers and Pitfalls in Sequence Analysis: The 70% Hurdle”Genome Research10(4):398-400 (Apr. 2000).
Bowie et al., “Deciphering Science the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions”Science247:1306-1310 (1990).
Brenner, S.E., “Errors in genome annotation”Trends in Genetics15(4):132-133 (Apr. 1999).
Carpenter et al., “Characterization of Two Patched Receptors for the Vertebrate Hedgehog Protein Family.”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95(23):13630-13634 (1998).
Chen and Struhl., “Dual Roles for Patched in Sequestering and Transducing Hedgehog.”Cell. 87(3):553-563 (Nov. 1, 1996).
Concordet et al.Development122:2835-2846 (Feb. 1996).
de Jong et al., “Pathogenesis of adult testicular germ cell tumors. A cytogenetic model”Cancer Genetics&Cytogenetics48(2):143-167 (Sep. 1990).
Doerks, et al., “Protein annotation: detective work for function prediction”Trends in Genetics14(6):248-250 (Jun. 1998).
Echelard et al., “Sonic Hedgehog, A Member of a Family of Putative Signaling Molecules, is Implicated in the Regulation of CNS Polarity.”Cell. 75:1417-1430 (1993).
Ericson et al., “Sonic Hedgehog Induces the Differentiation of Ventral Forebrain Neurons: A Common Signal for Ventral Patterning Within the Neural Tube.”Cell. 81(5):747-756 (Jun. 2, 1995).
Fan and Tessier-Lavigne., “Patterning of Mammalian Somites by Surface Ectoderm and Notochord: Evidence for Sclerotome Induction by a Hedgehog Homolog.”Cell. 79(7):1175-1186 (Dec. 30, 1994).
Fujiwara et al.Human EST(GeneBank Accession No. D60589) (May 21, 1996).
Gailani et al., “The Role of the Human Homologue of Drosophila Patched in Sporadic Basal Cell Carcinomas.”Nature Genetics. 14:78-81 (Sep. 1996).
Goodrich et al., “Conservation of the Hedgehog/Patched Signaling Pathway from Flies to Mice: Induction of a Mouse Patched Gene by Hedgehog.”Genes Dev. 10(3):301-312 (1996).
Hahn et al., “Mutations of the Human Homolog of Drosophila Patched in the Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome”Cell85:841-851 (1996).
Hynes et al., “Control of Cell Pattern in the Neural Tube by the Zinc Finger Transcription Factor and Oncogene Gli-1.”Neuron. 19(1):15-26 (Jul. 1997).
Johnson et al., “Ectopic Expression of Sonic Hedgehog Alters Dorsal-Ventral Patterning of Somites.”Cell. 79:1165-1173 (1994).
Johnson et al., “Human Homolog of Patched, a Candidate Gene for the Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome”Science272:1668-1671 (1996).
Jones et al., “Replacing the Complementarity-Determining Regions in a Human Antibody with Those From a Mouse”Nature321(6069):522-525 (May 29, 1986).
Krauss et al., “A Functionally Conserved Homolog of the Drosophila Segment Polarity Gene hh is Expressed in Tissues with Polarizing Activity in Zebrafish Embryos.”Cell. 75:1431-1444 (1993).
Laufer et al., “Sonic Hedgehog and Fgf-4 Act Through a Signaling Cascade and Feedback Loop to Integrate Growth and Patterning of the Developing Limb Bud.”Cell. 79(6):993-1003 (Dec. 16, 1994).
Liddell et al.Antibody Technology, BIOS Scientific Publishers pps. 9-24 and 85-102 (1995).
Marigo et al., “Biochemical Evidence that Patched is the Hedgehog Receptor.”Nature. 384(6605):176-179 (Nov. 14, 1996).
Marigo et al., “Conservation in hedgehog signaling: induction of a chicken patched homolog by Sonic hedgehog in the developing limb”Development122:1225-1233 (1996).
Marti et al., “Requirement of 19K Form of Sonic Hedgehog for Induction of Distinct Ventral Cell Types in CNS Explants.”Nature. 375(6529):322-325 (May 25, 1995).
Morrison et al., “Chimeric Human Antibody Molecules: Mouse Antigen-Binding Domains with Human Constant Region Domains”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81(21):6851-6855 (Nov. 1984).
Motoyama et al., “Ptch2, a second mouse Patched gene is co-expressed with Sonic hedgehog.”Nature Genetics18(2):104-106 (Feb. 1998).
Nakano et al., “A protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains encoded by the Drosophila segment polarity gene patched”Nature341:508-513 (1989).
Ngo et al., “The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure”Computational Complexity Protein Structure Prediction, and the Levinthal Paradox, Chapter 14, pp. 492-495 (Mar. 2, 1995).
Nusslein-Volhard et al., “Mutations Affecting the Pattern of the Larval Cuticle in Drosophila Melanogaster”Roux's Archives of Developmental Biology193(5):267-282 (1984).
Oro et al., “Basal Cell Carcinomas in Mice Overexpressing Sonic Hedgehog.”Science. 276(5313):817-821 (May 2, 1997).
Perrimon, N., “Hedgehog and Beyond.”Cell. 80:517-520 (Feb. 1995).
Presta, L., “Antibody Engineering”Current Opinion in Structural Biology2:593-596 (1992).
Rassoulzadegan et al., “Transmeiotic differentiation of male germ cells in culture”Cell75(5):997-1006 (Dec. 3, 1993).
Riddle et al., “Sonic Hedgehog Mediates the Polarizing Activity of the ZPA.”Cell. 75:1401-1416 (1993).
Riechmann et al., “Reshaping Human Antibodies for Therapy”Nature332:323-327 (Mar. 24, 1988).
Roberts et al., “Son
Carpenter David A.
de Sauvage Frederic J.
Bunner Bridget E
Farley Patrick J.
Genentech Inc.
Howard Zachary C
LandOfFree
Methods of screening for agonists and antagonists of patched-2 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods of screening for agonists and antagonists of patched-2, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods of screening for agonists and antagonists of patched-2 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4202765