Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles

Details Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles

2001-04-11

2002-09-03

Coleman, Brenda (Department: 1624)

Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series

Organic compounds

Unsubstituted hydrocarbyl chain between the ring and the -c-...

C540S465000, C540S470000, C540S471000, C540S472000, C540S476000, C544S247000, C544S251000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06444808

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention is in the field of macrocycle synthesis, more specifically, the synthesis of cross-bridged macrocycles having utility as proton sponges or as ligands for metal binding, especially for preparation of transition-metal containing oxidation catalysts useful, for example, in laundry detergents. The present invention is also directed to the synthesis of Mn-containing complexes of cross-bridged macrocycles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Whereas macrocyclic chemistry, in general, is highly developed, the art of manufacturing cross-bridged macrocycles is new. Certain such macrocycles, such as cross-bridged derivatives of cyclam, have only recently been synthesized in small amounts, and commercial processes are not known. It would be highly desirable to have such processes, since cross-bridged macrocycles have unique advantages as proton sponges or when used as ligands in the catalysis of bleaching.
Macrocycles have been made in numerous ways. See, for example, “Heterocyclic compounds: Aza-crown macrocycles”, J. S. Bradshaw et. al., Wiley-Interscience, 1993, which also describes a, number of syntheses of such ligands. Though macrocycle synthesis is well developed in general, synthesis of cross-bridged macrocycles is not. Cross-bridged macrocycle synthesis is rare and difficult, and involves multiple steps and unpleasant solvents (DMF, acetonitrile, or the like).
Cross-bridging, i.e., bridging across nonadjacent nitrogens, of a known macrocycle, cyclam (1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane), is known in limited context. It is, for example, described by Weisman et al,
J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,
(1990), 112(23), 8604-8605. More particularly, Weisman et al.,
Chem. Commun.,
(1996), pp. 947-948, describe a range of assertedly new cross-bridged tetraamine ligands which are bicyclo[6.6.2], [6.5.2], and [5.5.2] systems, and their complexation to Cu(II) and Ni(II), demonstrating that the ligands coordinate the metals in a cleft. Specific complexes reported include those of the ligands 1.1:
in which A is hydrogen or benzyl and (a) m=n=1; or (b) m=1 and n=0; or (c) m=n=0, including a Cu(II)chloride complex of the ligand having A=H and m=n=1; Cu(II) perchlorate complexes where A=H and m=n=1 or m=n=0; a Cu(II)chloride complex of the ligand having A=benzyl and m=n=0; and a Ni(II)bromide complex of the ligand having A=H and m=n=1. This handful of complexes appears to be the total of those known wherein the bridging is not across “adjacent” nitrogens.
Weisman also provides a synthesis method for a cross-bridged cyclam which uses three steps, two of which use acetonitrile as solvent. These steps are (1) reaction of a parent macrocycle with glyoxal to form a bisaminal and (2) quaternization of the bisaminal with methyl iodide, to form a dimethylated bisaminal diiodide. A further step, (3), reduction of the diquaternary intermediate produced in the second step, is required to make the desired product. This step uses ethanol as solvent. There is an apparent requirement to conduct the synthesis at relatively high dilution, which is commercially unattractive. Yields are borderline for commercial utility ( only 80% and 85% in the first and second steps, respectively.) In view of the desirable properties of cross-bridged macrocycles as ligands and the limitations of the existing method of making such a macrocycle, there is a clear need and desire for improvement in the synthesis of such cross-bridged macrocycles.
To summarize, current syntheses have one or more of the following limitations: (a) they use relatively environmentally undesirable solvents, such as acetonitrile; (b) they may incorporate “high-dilution” steps, increasing solvent consumption; (c) they require switching from one solvent to another in different stages of manufacture; increasing cost and complexity further, and (d) they are wasteful in calling for large excesses of materials such as alkyl halides and/or reducing agents.
Accordingly, it would be highly desirable to improve the synthesis of cross-bridged macrocycles, and in particular, methods for making cross-bridged derivatives of cyclam, and to provide methods for synthesizing Mn-containing complexes with cross-bridged macrocyclic ligands. These and other improvements are secured herein, as will be seen from the following disclosure.
BACKGROUND ART
See documents cited in the background. Also, Tabushi and co-workers, cited in Bradshaw et al., supra, make use of ethanol as a solvent for preparing a tetraazamacrocycle by dimerization. However, the macrocycle is not cross-bridged and the method described is not capable of forming a cross-bridged macrocycle.


REFERENCES:
patent: 6225464 (2001-05-01), Hiler, II et al.
Weisman et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 8604-8605.*
Weisman et al Chem. Commun. (1996) 947-948.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods of making cross-bridged macropolycycles will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2890823