Methods of calculating differences of binding affinities...

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system – Dimensional determination

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C702S019000, C702S027000, C702S136000, C374S045000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07970580

ABSTRACT:
Described is a technique to exhaustively enumerate the thermodynamic properties of the water molecules solvating the active site of a protein in its apostate and calculate the relative binding affinities of congeneric compounds that bind to this protein. The subject matter includes sampling the configurations of the solvating water in the active site; extracting the thermodynamic information about the solvating water from these configurations by clustering the observed water configurations into regions of high water occupancy (e.g., “hydration sites”), computing the average system interaction energies of water molecules occupying the various hydrations sites, computing excess entropies of water molecules occupying the hydration sites; constructing a 3 dimensional hydration thermodynamics map of the protein active site; and computing relative binding affinities of congeneric ligands based on the principle that tighter binding ligands can displace more entropically structured and energetically depleted hydration sites from the active site into the bulk fluid.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6193413 (2001-02-01), Lieberman
patent: 6226603 (2001-05-01), Freire et al.
patent: 6230102 (2001-05-01), Tidor et al.
patent: 6735530 (2004-05-01), Guarnieri
patent: 6772073 (2004-08-01), Freire et al.
patent: 2004/0215400 (2004-10-01), Solvic et al.
patent: 2007/0061118 (2007-03-01), Friesner et al.
patent: 2008/0312840 (2008-12-01), Desmet et al.
Jacobs et al “Elucidating Protein Thermodynamics from the Three-Dimensional Structure of the Native State Using Network Rigidity”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, Feb. 2005, pp. 903-915.
Barillari et al., “Classification of Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites”,J. Am, Chem. Soc., 129: 2577-2587 (2007).
Silberstein et al., “Computational Methods for Functional Site Identification Suggest a Substrate Access Channel in Transaldolase”,Genome Informatics, 17(1), 13-22 (2006).
Dennis et al., “Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins”,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 99(7): 4290-4295 (2002).
Clark, et al., “Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulation of Ligand-Protein Binding”,J. Chem. Inf. Model., 46: 231-242 (2006).
Gilson, et al., 2007, “Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities,” <http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132550> retrieved on [Nov. 21, 2008].
Notice of Allowance issued on Mar. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,783.
Response filed on Jan. 6, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,783.
Non-final rejection issued on Oct. 1, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,783.
Non-final rejection dated Sep. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/791,493.
Response to non-final rejection, filed on Dec. 15, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/791,493.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods of calculating differences of binding affinities... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods of calculating differences of binding affinities..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods of calculating differences of binding affinities... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2678011

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.