Methods for treating central nervous system damage

Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C607S050000, C607S117000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07991477

ABSTRACT:
Methods for the treatment of CNS damage are described, and include inducing in a subject in need of such treatment, a therapeutically effective amount of functional electronic stimulation (FES) sufficient to evoke patterned movement in the subject's muscles, the control of which has been affected by the CNS damage. The induction of FES-evoked patterned movement at least partially restores lost motor and sensory function, and stimulates regeneration of neural progenitor cells in the subject patient.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4558704 (1985-12-01), Petrofsky
patent: 4602638 (1986-07-01), Adams
patent: 4719922 (1988-01-01), Padjen et al.
patent: 4919140 (1990-04-01), Borgens et al.
patent: 5002053 (1991-03-01), Garcia-Rill et al.
patent: 5014705 (1991-05-01), Graupe et al.
patent: 5121747 (1992-06-01), Andrews
patent: 5269303 (1993-12-01), Wernicke et al.
patent: 5634462 (1997-06-01), Tyler et al.
patent: 5843142 (1998-12-01), Sultan
patent: 5968921 (1999-10-01), Gold
patent: 5974342 (1999-10-01), Petrofsky
patent: 6163725 (2000-12-01), Peckham et al.
patent: 6167888 (2001-01-01), Tuszynski et al.
patent: 6210974 (2001-04-01), Gold
patent: 6501985 (2002-12-01), Hirano et al.
patent: 6988004 (2006-01-01), Kanno et al.
patent: 2004/0044381 (2004-03-01), Duncan et al.
patent: 2004/0215290 (2004-10-01), Zealear
patent: 0219204 (1987-04-01), None
patent: 0348535 (1990-03-01), None
Andrews et al., “Control of FES in paraplegia: modeling voluntary arm forces,” Biomed. Mater. Eng., 1998, pp. 241-251, vol. 8.
Andrews et al., “Hybrid FES orthosis incorporating closed loop control and sensory feedback,” J. Biomed. Eng., 1988, pp. 189-195, vol. 10.
Ashworth, “Preliminary Trial of Carisoprodol in Multiple Sclerosis,” The Practitioner, 1964, pp. 540-542.
Backman et al., “Case Studies, Single-Subject Research, and N of 1 Randomized Trials, Comparisons and Contrasts,” Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 1999, pp. 170-176, vol. 78.
Bajd et al., “Restoration of walking in patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries by use of surface electrical stimulation—preliminary results,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., pp. 109-111, vol. 9.
Baker et al., “Chronic Blocade of Bioelectric Activity in Neonatal Rat Neocortex In Vitro: Physiolocal Effects,” Int. J. Devl. Neuroscience, 1991, pp. 321-329, vol. 9.
Barbeau et al., “Recovery of Locomotion After Chronic Spinalization in the Adult Cat,” Brain Research, 1987, pp. 84-95, vol. 412.
Barbeau et al., “Tapping into Spinal Circuits to Restore Motor Function,” Brain Research Reviews, 1999, pp. 27-51, vol. 30.
Barres et al., “Proliferatino of Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Depends on Electrical Activity in Axons,” Nature, 1993, pp. 258-260, vol. 361.
Becker et al., “Functional Electrical Stimulation Helps Replenish Neural Cells in the Adult CNS After Spinal Cord Injury,” Washington University School of Medicine, pp. 1-25.
Behrman et al., “Locomotor Training After Human Spinal Cord Injury: A Series of Case Studies,” Physical Therapy, 2000, pp. 688-700, vol. 80.
Benevento et al., “Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Somatostatin Immunoreactivity in the Visual Cortex of Normal and Dark-Reared Rats,” Brain Research, 1995, pp. 172-182, vol. 689.
Blight, “Cellular Morphology of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury in the Cat: Analysis of Myelinated Axons by Line-Sampling,” Neuroscience, 1983, pp. 521-543, vol. 10.
Bracken et al., “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury,” The New England J. Medicine, 1990, pp. 1405-1411, vol. 322.
Bracken et al., “Methylprednisolone or Tirilazad Mesylate Administration After Acute Spinal Cord Injury: 1-Year Follow Up,” J. Neurosurg., 1998, pp. 699-706, vol. 89.
Brex et al., “Measurement of Spinal Cord Area in Clinically Isolated Syndromes Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 2001, pp. 544-547, vol. 70.
Bunge et al., “Observations on the Pathology of Human Spinal Cord Injury, A Review and Classification of 22 New Cases with Details from a Case of Chronic Cord Compression with Extensive Focal Demyelination,” Advances in Neurology, 1993, pp. 75-89, vol. 59.
Carlson et al., “Acute Inflammatory Response in Spinal Cord Following Impact Injury,” Experimental Neurology, 1998, pp. 77-88, vol. 151.
Chollet et al., “The Functional Anatomy of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Humans: A Study with Positron Emission Tomography,” Ann. Neurol, 1991, pp. 63-71, vol. 29.
Cohen et al., “A Test of the 1992 International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury,” Spinal Cord, 1998, pp. 554-560, vol. 36.
Coleman et al., “A Critical Appraisal of the Reporting of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (II and III) of Methylprednisolone in Actue Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Spinal Disorders, 2000, pp. 185-199, vol. 13.
Cooper-Kuhn et al., “Is It All DNA Repair? Methodological Considerations for Detecting Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain,” Developmental Brain Res., 2002, pp. 13-21, vol. 134.
Corbetta et al., “Functional Reorganization and Stability of Somatosensory-Motor Cortical Topography in a Tetraplegic Subject with Late Recovery,” PNAS, 2002, pp. 17066-17071, vol. 99.
Corner et al., “Spontaneous Firing as an Epigenetic Factor in Brain Development—Physiological Consequences of Chronic Tetrodotoxin Picrotoxin Exposure on Cultured Rat Neocortex Neurons,” Developmental Brain Research, 1992, pp. 57-64, vol. 65.
Creasey et al., “An Implantable Neuroprosthesis for Restoring Bladder and Bowel Control to Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Multicenter Trial,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2001, pp. 1512-1519, vol. 82.
Cummings et al., “Bone Density at Various Sites for Prediction of Hip Fractures,” The Lancet, 1993, pp. 72-75, vol. 341.
Dai et al., “Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 1996, pp. 63-72, vol. 4.
Dalby et al., “No Loss of Hippocampal Hilar Somatostatinergic Neurons After Repeated Electroconvulsive Shock: A Combined Stereological and In Situ Hybridization Study,” Biol. Psychiatry, 1996, pp. 54-60, vol. 40.
Davies et al., “Adult Axon Regeneration in Adult CNS White Matter,” Dept. of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, 1 page.
Davis et al., “Paraplegia: prolonged closed-loop standing with implanted nucleus FES-22 stimulator and Andrews' foot-ankle orthosis,” Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg., 1997, pp. 281-287, vol. 69.
Davis et al., “Paraplegia: prolonged standing using closed-loop functional electrical stimulation and Andrews ankle-foot orthosis,” Artif. Organs, 1999, pp. 418-420, vol. 23.
Davoodi et al., “Computer simulation of FES standing up in paraplegia: a self-adaptive fuzzy controller with reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 1998, pp. 151-161, vol. 6.
Davoodi et al., “Optimal control of FES-assisted standing up in paraplegia using genetic algorithms,” Med. Eng. Phys., 1999, pp. 609-617, vol. 21.
Davoodi et al., “Predicting the voluntary arm forces in FES-assisted standing up using neural networks,” Biol. Cybern., 2001, pp. 122-143, vol. 85.
Dean et al., “Cell-Cycle Analysis Using a Monoclonal Antibody to BrdUrd,” Cell Tissue Kinet., 1984, pp. 427-436, vol. 17.
Demerens et all, “Induction of Myelination in the Central Nervous System by Electrical Activity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996, pp. 9887-9892, vol. 93.
Dietz, “Spinal Cord Lesion: Effects of an Perspectives for Treatment,” Neural Plasticity, 2001, pp. 83-90, vol. 8.
Dimitrijevic et al., “Motor Control in Man After Partial or Complete Spinal Cord Injury,” Motor Control Mechan

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods for treating central nervous system damage does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods for treating central nervous system damage, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for treating central nervous system damage will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2766711

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.