Hydraulic and earth engineering – Earth treatment or control – Chemical
Reexamination Certificate
1999-06-02
2001-04-03
Neuder, William (Department: 3673)
Hydraulic and earth engineering
Earth treatment or control
Chemical
C405S128350, C588S253000, C588S253000, C134S028000, C210S747300, C205S687000, C205S766000, C205S771000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06210078
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods for the in situ removal of a contaminant from soil.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The removal of toxic and hazardous materials from the environment is a growing concern. In particular, the removal of contaminants such as organic compounds and heavy metals from the soil is the focus of intense research. The contamination of groundwater and, ultimately, drinking water is the driving force behind the extensive research being conducted in order to remove toxic and hazardous contaminants from the soil.
Numerous techniques for the remediation of soil are disclosed in the art. One approach involves the excavation of soil followed by treating the soil with additives and chemicals to remove the contaminant. U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,176 to Pierce discloses the addition of phosphoric acid, monocalcium phosphate, monoammonium phosphate and diammonium either alone or in combination with Portland cement to excavated soil samples. U.S. Pat. No. 5,640,701 to Grant et al. disclose a method for removing radioactive contaminants from excavated soil by treating the soil with an extracting agent composed of potassium carbonate, potassium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride, acetic acid, sodium hypochloride, ammonium carbonate, and ammonium bicarbonate. U.S. Pat. No. 5,193,936 to Pal et al. disclose treating excavated soil with a sulfate compound followed by a phosphate reagent.
The treatment of excavated soil has a number of disadvantages. First, it is expensive to operate excavating and trucking equipment needed to remove the contaminated soil. Second, the transportation of hazardous material is monitored by strict regulations. Finally, it has been shown in the art that some methods used to treat the excavated soil are not effective for the removal of heavy metals, such as lead, from the soil.
Another method involves the addition of additives or chemicals directly into the soil in order to convert the contaminant into a non-leachable form. U.S. Pat. No. 5,202,033 to Stanforth et al. disclose the addition of a phosphate, a carbonate, or a chemical reducing additive into the soil or waste. The contaminant is rendered nonhazardous, and is not removed from the soil. Indeed, Stanforth et al. disclose that the removal of the contaminant from the soil is lengthy and expensive.
The removal of contaminants from waste water has also been disclosed in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 4,289,594 to Aplaugh; U.S. Pat. No. 5,310,488 to Hansen et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,453 to Walker; U.S. Pat. No. 4,820,417 to Buchmeier; U.S. Pat. No. 4,272,494 to Ljubman et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,118,243 to Sandesara; U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,633 to Moniwa et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,978 to Legget et al. disclose the removal of contaminants from waste water and aqueous solutions by chemical or physical means. These references, however, do not disclose the removal of contaminants from soil.
An alternative to treating excavated soil is in situ soil remediation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,769,961 to Peters et al. disclose a process for the in situ remediation of soil containing arsenic. The process involves contacting the soil with an aqueous extraction solution, directing the extractant solution through the soil so that the extractant solution interacts with the arsenic contaminant, and collecting the extractant solution containing the arsenic contaminant. Peters et al. disclose that iron and aluminum salts can be added to the extractant solution containing the arsenic contaminant in order to bring the arsenic contaminant out of solution. When an extractant, such as citric acid, is used in the process of Peters et al., the process is very inefficient with respect to arsenic removal because floc formation is inhibited by the citric acid. There is no disclosure in Peters et al. to remove the extractant from the solution prior to removing the arsenic by floc formation. Additionally, there is no disclosure in Peters et al. for using a membrane, such as a ceramic membrane, or an ion exchange resin to remove the arsenic contaminant from the extraction solution. Finally, Peters et al. does not disclose the mobilization of the contaminant in soil by electroremediation.
In light of the above it would be very desirable to have an efficient method for the in situ removal of a contaminant from soil. The present invention solves such a need in the art while providing surprising advantages. The present invention provides a method that effectively removes a contaminant from soil at an accelerated rate without having to treat excavated soil.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the purpose(s) of this invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, this invention, in one aspect, relates to a method for removing a contaminant in situ from soil containing the contaminant, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the contaminant in situ with a reagent to remove the contaminant from the soil and to form a mixture comprising the contaminant;
b) removing the mixture from the soil;
c) forming a floc in the mixture to form a contaminant-floc complex; and
d) contacting the mixture containing the contaminant-floc complex with a ceramic membrane to thereby remove the contaminant-floc complex,
wherein the reagent is not citric acid.
The invention further relates to a method for removing an arsenic compound in situ from soil containing the arsenic compound, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the arsenic compound in situ with phosphoric acid to form a mixture;
b) mobilizing the mixture by electroremediation;
c) removing the mixture from the soil;
d) adding an iron salt to the mixture to form an arsenic-floc complex; and
e) contacting the mixture containing the arsenic-floc complex with a ceramic membrane to thereby remove the arsenic-floc complex.
The invention further relates to a method for removing a contaminant in situ from soil containing the contaminant, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the contaminant in situ with a reagent to form a mixture;
b) mobilizing the mixture by electroremediation;
c) removing the mixture from the soil; and
d) removing the contaminant from the mixture.
The invention further relates to a method for removing a contaminant in situ from soil containing the contaminant, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the contaminant in situ with a chelate to form a mixture comprising a contaminant-chelate complex;
b) removing the mixture from the soil; and
c) contacting the mixture with an ion exchange resin, whereby the contaminant-chelate complex is separated from the mixture.
The invention relates to a method for removing an arsenic compound in situ from soil containing the arsenic compound, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the arsenic compound with citric acid in situ to form a mixture comprising an arsenic-citric acid complex;
b) mobilizing the mixture by electroremediation;
c) removing the mixture from the soil; and
d) contacting the mixture with an anionic ion exchange resin, whereby the arsenic-citric acid complex is separated from the mixture.
The invention further relates to a method for removing a contaminant in situ from soil containing the contaminant, comprising:
a) contacting the soil containing the contaminant with a chelate in situ to form a mixture comprising a contaminant-chelate complex;
b) mobilizing the mixture by electroremediation;
c) removing the mixture from the soil; and
d) contacting the mixture with an ion exchange resin, whereby the contaminant-chelate complex is separated from the mixture.
The invention further relates to a method of removing a contaminant in situ from soil containing the contaminant, comprising:
contacting the soil containing the contaminant with a chelate in situ to form a first mixture comprising a contaminant-chelate complex;
b) removing the first mixture from the soil;
c) chemically destroying the contaminant-chelate complex of the first mixture to produce a second mixture comprising the contaminant; and
d) removing the contaminant from the second mixture.
The inv
Drummonds David L.
Morris David W.
Redwine James C.
Needle & Rosenberg P.C.
Neuder William
Pechhold Alexandra K.
Southern Company Services
LandOfFree
Methods for the in situ removal of a contaminant from soil does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods for the in situ removal of a contaminant from soil, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for the in situ removal of a contaminant from soil will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2452305