Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Biological or biochemical
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-13
2004-12-07
Allen, Marianne P. (Department: 1631)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system in a specific environment
Biological or biochemical
C435S006120
Reexamination Certificate
active
06829539
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to proteomics and, more specifically to de novo sequencing of polypeptides using mass spectrometry.
Proteomics can be described as the study of proteins expressed by a given cellular state, and like genomics, it is a global rather than a hypothesis driven science. Questions for study are not asked in series, such as which protein causes a given biological activity or effect, but rather in parallel, such as how do all of the expressed proteins in a given cell describe that cell. The use of mass spectrometry in proteomic studies has been employed as part of a global comparison of proteins that seeks to define the proteins characteristic of a state or to determine differences between states. An example would be the comparison of proteomes from cancerous versus normal cells with the intent of discovering a protein or proteins that are associated with cancer.
Mass spectrometry methods have been employed as a descriptive science to catalogue or compare proteins that represent a given cellular condition. Additionally, mass spectrometric methods have also been employed for determining the relative abundance of proteins expressed between two different biological samples. These methods allow the changes in protein expression between cells in different conditions or environments to be studied on a global scale so that information on protein expression can be gathered on multiple proteins in a single experiment. Assessing the relative abundance of proteins between different conditions has been based on differential mass labeling of proteins with stable isotopes either in vitro or in vivo. Mass spectrometry data from these experiments can also be used to search protein databases in hopes of identifying proteins within the sample. However, additional information about the samples, such as the correct sequence of proteins within the sample, is not available.
Numerous drawbacks exist which hinder the accuracy or efficiency of sequence identification using database searching. For example, protein identity can not be determined for proteins whose sequence is not in a database, for example, because the genome from which the protein is derived might not have been sequenced yet. In addition, the increasing complexity of these databases can lead to several possible protein identifications for each polypeptide fragment making it difficult to determine the true protein identity with confidence. Furthermore, database searching is limited in that this method can not accurately detect mutations or post-translational modifications in proteins. Almost all protein sequences are post-translationally modified, and as many as 200 types of covalent modifications of amino acid residues are known. Post-translational modifications of proteins are often important for biological activity.
Mass spectrometry has been used to determine the amino acid sequence of proteins of interest without searching a database through a method called de novo sequencing. In this method, the difference in mass of mass spectrometry peaks is correlated to the mass of amino acids that make up the polypeptide sequence. One limitation of mass spectrometry de novo sequencing methods is that the mass spectrometry data needs to be of high quality so that polypeptide mass spectrometry signals can be distinguished over non-peptide signals. High thorough-put proteomics experiments, and experiments determining the relative mass of polypeptides between two samples, have not generated mass spectrometry data of sufficient quality for de novo sequence determination. Also instruments with this capability are currently available in only a few laboratories since they are expensive and need highly skilled operators. Another limitation of mass spectrometry de novo sequencing methods is that polypeptides must be labeled in such a way that directionality can be assigned to the sequence. It is important to know whether a given fragment ion results from charge retention on the amino- or carboxyl-terminus in order to determine orientation of the sequence.
Thus, there exists a need for efficient and reliable de novo sequencing from mass spectrometry data. The present invention satisfies this need and provides related advantages as well.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a method of determining an amino acid sequence of a parent polypeptide. The method consists of (a) obtaining mass spectra of two or more differentially labeled polypeptide fragments of a parent polypeptide; (b) assigning a mass and a weighting characteristic to two or more paired signals having a difference in mass corresponding to an integer value of said differential label, the weighting characteristic combining properties of each signal within said paired signals; (c) selecting from the mass spectra a paired signal having the assigned mass and a weighting characteristic distinguishable from non-peptide signals, the assigned mass indicating the mass of a polypeptide fragment within the spectra; (d) determining the difference in mass of the polypeptide fragments; (e) assigning the mass differences a satisfying amino acid name, and (f) orienting the assigned amino acid names. Also provided is a method of determining the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide. The method consists of: (a) constructing a graph from mass spectra of two or more differentially labeled polypeptides, the graph comprising a node with mass m, number of labels n, intensity i, and mass differential of labels &dgr;; (b) creating a node corresponding to a paired signal having masses of about m and about m+n&dgr;, and (c) adding a labeled weighted directed edge to the graph between any two nodes corresponding to a mass of an amino acid, the labeled weighted directed edge combining properties of the paired signals.
REFERENCES:
patent: 0887646 (1998-12-01), None
patent: WO93/24834 (1993-12-01), None
Bruce et al., “High-Mass-Measurement Accuracy and 100% Sequence Coverage of Enzymatically Digested Bovine Serum Albumin from an ESI-FTICR Mass Spectrum,”Anal. Chem. 71:2595-2599 (1999).
Berndt et al., “Reliable automatic protein identification from matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric peptide fingerprints,”Electrophoresis, 20:3521-3526 (1999).
Chen et al., “A dynamic programming approach to de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry,”Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, San Francisco 389-398 (2000).
Dan{hacek over (c)}ik et al., “De novopeptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry,”J. Comp. Biol., 6:327-342 (1999).
Goodlett et al., “Protein identification with a single accurate mass of a cysteine-containing peptide and constrained database searching,”Anal. Chem., 72:1112-1118 (2000).
Gygi et al., “Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags,”Nature Biotechnology, 17:994-999 (1999).
Horn et al., “Automatedde novosequencing of proteins by tandem high-resolution mass spectometry,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97:10313-10317 (2000).
Keough et al., “A method for high-sensitivity peptide sequencing using postsource decay matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 96:7131-7136 (1999).
Nicola et al., “Automation of data collection for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using a correlative analysis algorithm,”Anal. Chem., 71:3213-3219 (1998).
Pevzner et al., “Efficiency of database search for identification of mutated and modified proteins via mass spectrometry,”Genome Research, 11:290-299 (2001).
Pevzner et al., “Mutation-tolerant protein identification by mass spectrometry,”J. Comp. Biol., 7(6;:777-787 (2000).
Sechi and Chait, “A method to define the carboxyl terminal of proteins,”Anal. Chem., 72:3374-3378 (2000).
Sechi and Chait, “Modification of cysteine residues by alkylation. A tool in peptide mapping and protein identification,”Anal. Chem., 70:5150-5158 (1998).
Wilm et al., “De novo sequencing of proteins with mass spectrometry using the differential scanning tech
Goodlett David R.
Keller Andrew
Allen Marianne P.
Mahatan Channing S.
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
The Institute For Systems Biology
LandOfFree
Methods for quantification and de novo polypeptide... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods for quantification and de novo polypeptide..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for quantification and de novo polypeptide... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3337530