Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and – Method of using a plant or plant part in a breeding process... – Method of breeding involving a tissue culture step
Reexamination Certificate
2006-05-04
2010-11-30
Ibrahim, Medina A. (Department: 1638)
Multicellular living organisms and unmodified parts thereof and
Method of using a plant or plant part in a breeding process...
Method of breeding involving a tissue culture step
C800S269000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07842850
ABSTRACT:
Methods for producing hybrids between domestic and wild soybean that are fertile and can be further bred with other soybean plants are provided, thus allowing transfer of desirable traits and genes from the wild soybean into the domestic soybean. This invention also provides novel media for producing callus and multiple somatic embryos, as well as novel media for producing multiple shoots from the embryos. The hybrid plants are made fertile by colchicine treatment to double their chromosome number so that they can be backcrossed into domestic soybean. These methods and media allow the production of elite soybean lines containing traits or genes from wild soybean as well as a minimum amount of additional wild soybean DNA. Backcrosses containing only one wild soybean chromosome can be produced, as well as sets of such backcrossed lines that each contain one chromosome from the wild ancestor, but collectively all the wild chromosomes from the hybrid ancestor. Plants and plant progeny and plant tissue (tissue including seeds) of plants produced by the foregoing methods are also provided. The methods do not require genetic modification, and thus this invention allows production of domestic soybean plants that are not genetically-modified organisms (non-GMO) but that express desirable traits derived from wild soybean.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5710365 (1998-01-01), Kerr et al.
Newell et al. 1982. Crop Sci. 22: 1062-1065.
Singh et al. 1987. Theor Appl Genet 74: 391-396.
Singh et al. 1993. Crop Sci. 33: 1002-1007.
Abe et al. (2003) “Photoperiod-Insensitive Japanese Soybean Landraces Differ at Two Maturity Loci,” Crop Sci. 43:1300-1304.
Bodanese-Zanettini et al. (1996) “Wide Hybridization Between Brazilian Soybean Cultivars and Wild Perennial Relatives,” Theor. Appl. Genet. 93(5-6):703-709.
Boote, K.J. (1980) “Double Cropping Soybean Succeeding Soybeans in Florida,” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Sothern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, Jun. 19, 1980, Gainesville Florida, pp. 21-29.
Bromfield et al. (1980) “Resistance to Soybean Rust and Mode of Inheritance,” Crop Sci. 20:254-255.
Bromfield, K.R. (1984) “Soybean Rust,” monogr. 11, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
Bromfield et al. (1980) “Virulence and Aggressiveness of Cultures of Phakopsora pachyrhizi Causing Soybean Rust,” Phytropath. 70:17-21.
Broué et al. (1982) “Interspecific Hybridization of Soybeans and Perennial Glycine Species Indigenous to Australia via Embryo Culture,” Euphytica 31:715-724.
Brucker, E.A. (2004) “The Effect of the Soybean Gene rhg1 on Reproduction of Heterodera glycines in the Field and Greenhouse and Associated Effects on Agronomic Traits,” M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Burdon et al. (1981) “Inter- and Intra-Specific Diversity in Disease Response of Glycine Species to the Leaf Rust Fungus Phakospora pachyrhizi,” J. Ecol. 69:381-390.
Burdon, J.J. (1986) “The Potential of Australian Native Glycine Species as Sources of Resistance to Soybean Rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi),” In; New Frontiers in Breeding researches, Nampompeth et al. eds., Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, pp. 823-832.
Cheng et al. (1983) “Studies in Polyploidy in Soybeans: A Simple and Effective Colchicine Technique of Chromosome Doubling for Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and its Wild Relatives,” Soybean Genet. Newsl. 10:23-24.
Chung et al. (1990) “Production of Interspecific Hybrids Between Glycine max and G. tomentella Through Embryo Culture,” Euphytica 48:97-101.
Chung et al. (1991) “Obtaining Intersubgeneric Hybridization Between Glycine max and G. Latifolia,” Plant Tissue Culturing Technol. 18(1):39-45.
Coble et al. (1990) “Nutrient Culture Medium Components Affecting Plant Recovery from Immature Embryos of Three Glycine Genotypes and an Interspecific Hybrid Grown in Vitro,” Euphytica 50:127-133.
Cook et al. (2000) “Cyst Nematodes: Globodera and Heterodera Species,” In; Plant Resistance to Parasitic Nematodes, Starr et al. eds., CABI Publishing, pp. 71-105.
Croplan Genetics (2004) “Plant Characteristics,” http://www.croplangenetics.com/soybean.asp?topic=4&sm=i—e.
Don et al. (1991) “Touch Down PCR to Prevent Spurious Priming During Gene Amplification,” Nuc. Acids Res. 19:4008.
Doyle et al. (1985) “Numerical Analysis of Isozyme Variation in Glycine tomentella,” Biochem. Syst. Evol. 13:413-419.
Gamborg et al. (Apr. 1968) “Nutrient Requirements of Suspension Cultures of Soybean Root Cells,” Exp. Cell Res. 50 (1):151-158.
Grant et al. (1986) “Cytogenetic Affinity Between the New Species Glycine argyrea and its Congeners,” J. Heredity 77:423-426.
Harmon (2005) “Asian Soybean Rust Caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi on Soybean and Kudzu in Florida,” Online Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2005-0613-01-RS.
Hartman et al. (1991) “Soybean Rust Development and the Quantitative Relationship Between Rust Severity and Soybean Yield,” Plant. Dis. 75:596-600.
Hartman et al. (1992) “Sources of resistance to Soybean Rust in Perennial Glycine Species,” Plant Dis. 76(4):396-399.
Hartman et al. (2000) “Evaluation of Perennial Glycine Species for Resistance to Soybean Fungal Pathogens that Cause Sclerotinia Stem Rot and Sudden Death Syndrom,” Crop Sci. 40:545-549.
Hartwig et al. (1983) “Relationship Among Three Genes Conferring Specific Resistance to Rust in Soybean,” Crop Sci. 23:237-239.
Hartwig, E.E. (1986) “Identification of a Forth Major Gene Conferring Resistance to Soybean Rust,” Crop Sci. 26:1135-1136.
Heath, M.S. (1989) “Analysis of Hybrid Plants and Progeny of a Cross Between Glycine max (L.) Merr. And Glycine tomentella,” M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University.
Hood et al. (1980) “Interspecific Hybridization Studies Between Cultivated Soybean, Glycine max and a Perennial Wild Relative, G.falcata,” Agron. Abst. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI., pp. 58.
Hood et al. (1987) “Crossing Soybeans with a Wild Perennial Relative,” Tennessee Farm and Home Sci. 144:26-50.
Hymowitz, T. (1995) “I-D. Evaluation of Wild Perennial Glycine Species and Crosses for Resistance to Phakopsora,” In; Proceedings of the Soybean Rust Workshop, Aug. 9-11, 1995, Sinclair et al. eds., National Soybean Research Laboratory Publication, No. 1, pp. 33-37.
Hymowitz et al. (1998) “The Genome of Glycine,” In; Plant Breeding Reviews, Janick, J. ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 289-317.
Hymowitz, T. (2004) “Speciation and Cytogenetics,” In; Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, Agron. Monogr., No. 16, ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI., pp. 97-136.
Hymowitz et al. (1984) “A Soybean X Glycine tomentella Hybrid: Progress and Problems,” Soybean Gen. Newsl. 11:90.
Hymowitz et al. (1986) “Plant Regeneration from Leaf Explants of Glycine clandestine Wendl,” Plant Cell Rep. 3:192-194.
Jena et al. (1989) “Monosomic Alien Addition Lines of Rice: Production, Morphology, Cytology, and Breeding Behavior,” Genome 32:449-455.
Kameya et al. (1981) “Plant Regeneration from Hypocotyls Sections of Glycine Species,” Plant Sci. Lett. 21:289-294.
Kartha, K.K. (1975) “Organogenesis and Embryogenesis,” In; Plant Tissue Culture Methods, Gamborg et al. eds., National Research Council, Sasktoon, Canada, pp. 44-49.
Kenworthy, W.J. (1989) “Potential Genetic Contributions of Wild Relatives to Soybean Improvement,” In; World Research Conference, Pascale, A.J. ed., proc., Buenos Aires, Mar. 5-9 Argentina, Assoc. Soja, Buenos Aires, pp. 883-888.
Kollipara et al. (1997) “Phylogenetic and Genomic Relationships in the Genus Glycine Willd. Based on Sequen
Greenlee Winner and Sullivan P.C.
Ibrahim Medina A.
Robinson Keith O.
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
LandOfFree
Methods for producing fertile crosses between wild and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods for producing fertile crosses between wild and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for producing fertile crosses between wild and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4238361