Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content

Details Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content

2000-11-21

2002-08-27

Sheikh, Ayaz (Department: 2155)

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput

Remote data accessing

Using interconnected networks

C709S202000, C709S218000, C709S219000, C709S223000, C709S233000, C713S152000, C370S428000, C345S215000, C600S558000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06442603

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to computer networks. More specifically, it relates to methods for ordered delivery of electronic content via a computer network.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Electronic content is obtained from a variety of computer networks including the Internet, intranets, and other computer networks. The Internet is a world-wide network of interconnected computers. The World-Wide-Web is an information system on the Internet designed for electronic content interchange. Electronic content on the World-Wide-Web is typically stored in files that include text, hypertext, references to graphics, animation, audio, video and other electronic data.
Network transfer latencies and electronic content types influence user perception of the quality of information provided by a computer network. Since response to the delivery of electronic content from computer networks like the Internet or an intranet is variable, user perception of the quality of information also varies. In one study, user perception of the quality of electronic content including text and graphics decreased as network response time increased. However, if the same electronic content is provided including only text and no graphics, user perception of the quality of the electronic content increased with respect to network response time. For more information see “The Effects of Internet Latency on User Perception of Information Content”, by M. S. Borella, A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, IEEE Global Internet'97, pp. 1932-1936, November, 1997.
It appears than when network latencies are large, users typically blame graphical information in the electronic content for delays in obtaining desired information. If requested electronic content has only text, users typically acknowledge that the content provider has done all that could be done to provide the electronic content in a timely manner. However, when network latencies are small, users typically expect the electronic content with text and graphics to contain a greater quality of information.
User perception of electronic content is important to many organizations, especially to those that use computer networks to provide information. For example, user perception of information may be important to a university to attract students, to a business to attract customers, to a charity to attract donations, etc. In many situations, the first and only impression that a potential client or customer receives is based on electronic content retrieved from an organization's computer network or site on the Internet.
The are several problems associated with providing electronic content to a wide range of users from a computer network. A user may connect to a computer network with a relatively slow dial-up connection via a modem (e.g., 56,000 bits-per-second), or over a higher-speed network connection (e.g., a 1.5 Mega-bit-per-second) in a university or corporation. The type of electronic content provided may be adjusted based on a connection speed. However, it is difficult to adjust the type of electronic content based on network latency. Network latency conditions change dynamically, and even a fast connection may have a large network latency at a given time. In addition, a provider of electronic content cannot predict with reasonable certainty what a network latency will be at a given time.
Another problem is that a content provider cannot determine an order electronic content will be delivered during network congestion on a network. It is often desirable to prioritize the delivery of selected electronic content so that “important” electronic content, such as content for navigation or explanation purposes be delivered before less important electronic content.
Another problem is that electronic table data from electronic content is not displayed until all table data from a table is downloaded. This causes a problem if a network session suffers from network congestion during the download of table data, since a user may be forced to look at a blank screen where table data will eventually appear for a long period of time.
Providing electronic content for users with varying network latencies may lead to user dissatisfaction and poor user perception of the electronic content. Thus, it is desirable to provide electronic content from computer network in a predictable manner to ensure improved user perception regardless of network latency.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with preferred embodiments of the present invention, some of the problems associated with user perception of electronic content provided by computer networks are overcome. Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content are provided. One aspect of the present invention includes sending selected types of electronic content (e.g., text, graphical images, tables, etc.) to a user over a computer network based on a preferred order of delivery using one or more delivery priority tags.
The present invention may improve user perception of requested original electronic content by dynamically sending an amount of original electronic content based on a determined network latency and providing electronic content over a computer network using ordered delivery. Improved user perception of original electronic content may help attract and retain students, customers, contributors, etc. to an organization's electronic content site on a computer network (e.g., a home page on the Internet or an intranet).


REFERENCES:
patent: 4058113 (1977-11-01), Fields
patent: 4843598 (1989-06-01), Krueger et al.
patent: 5774668 (1998-06-01), Choquier et al.
patent: 5838685 (1998-11-01), Hochman
patent: 5860936 (1999-01-01), Levin
patent: 5908467 (1999-06-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 5933413 (1999-08-01), Merchant et al.
patent: 5937163 (1999-08-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5983176 (1999-11-01), Hoffert et al.
patent: 6012083 (2000-01-01), Savitzky et al.
patent: 6012096 (2000-01-01), Link et al.
patent: 6018748 (2000-01-01), Smith
patent: 6021426 (2000-02-01), Douglis et al.
patent: 6035330 (2000-03-01), Astiz et al.
patent: 6038598 (2000-03-01), Danneels
patent: 6038599 (2000-03-01), Black et al.
patent: 6148332 (2000-11-01), Brewer et al.
patent: 6182125 (2001-01-01), Borella et al.
patent: 6253326 (2001-06-01), Lincke et al.
Borella et al., “The Effects Of Internet Latency On User Perception Of Information Content”, IEEE Internet 1997, pp. 1932-1936.
J. Postel, “Internet Control Message Protocol”, RFC 792, Sep. 1981. pp. 1-21.
J. Postel, “Transmission Control Protocol”, RFC 793, Sep. 1981, pp. i-85.
J. Postel, “User Datagram Protocol”, RFC 768, Aug. 28, 1980, pp. 1-3.
Bhushan et al., “The File Transfer Protocol”, RFC 172, Jun. 23, 1971, pp. 1-9.
Irvine et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1”, RFC 2068, Jan. 1997, pp. 1-115.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for ordered delivery of electronic content will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2906922