Facsimile and static presentation processing – Facsimile – Picture signal generator
Reexamination Certificate
1998-01-21
2001-01-23
Williams, Kimberly A. (Department: 2722)
Facsimile and static presentation processing
Facsimile
Picture signal generator
C358S484000, C362S297000, C362S310000, C362S346000, C359S584000, C313S114000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06178014
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to arrangements for illuminating objects, and particularly to such involving an integrating cylinder and associated illumination-coupling means.
BACKGROUND, FEATURES
Workers in the field of illumination are aware that the art of illuminating objects (e.g. for imaging thereof) is proceeding apace, with increasing need to more effectively provide intense lighting which is nonetheless diffused and uniform across a field of view, while also being cost-effective and free of harmful thermal effects.
This invention provides an illumination system that can be useful with an electronic image-capture system, giving a combined platform apt for integration in a high-speed processor. This platform provides the ability to capture a video image of an object as it passes through the processor at full speed, and direct the captured image data to additional electronics which process and compress the captured data. The data may then he stored in storage and retrieval systems where it may be accessed for further manipulation and processing, displayed on video workstations, printed (typically using high-definition laser printers), transmitted electronically from point to point, placed in an archive system where it may be stored for long periods, or any combination of these processes as defined by the system parameters. Such processes, or combinations of processes, are typically controlled by mainframe computers which act as “host” systems to link multiple imaging systems, storage and retrieval systems and other peripherals.
The transport systems for which this imaging platform is contemplated are capable of transporting objects past processing stations at speeds between 100 to 400 inches per second (ips, or 2.54 to 10.16 meters per second mps). The objects, with a typical thickness of 0.005 inches (0.125 millimeters) move along a vertical constraining channel known as a “track,” having a width of typically 0.070 to 0.090 inches (1.78 to 2.29 millimeters), known as the “track gap”. This “track gap” is made considerably wider than the width of the object to accommodate variations due to tolerances and also to accommodate foreign objects (e.g. documents with staples, paper-clips and the like) which inevitably are attached to such objects from time to time. While this “wide” track gap is necessary for reliable transport of documents, it creates an additional problem or depth of field for a potential video imaging system. Such system must be able to capture an image of the object (e.g. a sharp focus and with correct illumination no matter where it happens to be located within the track gap. The location of the object within the track gap may also change from point to point within the length of a single object.
The field of view to be captured by an imaging such as the one described here is largely defined by the maximum height of the objects (e.g. documents) which must be captured. The objects here contemplated (checks and like financial instruments) are typically between 2.75 to 4.75 inches (70.0 to 121.0 millimeters) high and between 6.0 and 10.0 inches (152.0 and 254.0 millimeters) long.
Image capture is achieved by passing the object in front of a photosensitive device known as a CCPD, well known to workers in the art. This consists of a large number of very small, individual photosensitive receptors, disposed in a linear array. The object is passed in front of the CCPD as a natural function of the object transport, and a complete image of the object linear segments individually captured from the CCPD, a process known in the art as “line scanning”.
The photoreceptors of the CCPD consist of a semiconductor material which is formulated to convert incident light into an analogue electrical signal, which varies in potential depending upon the intensity of the incident light. The captured image thus consists of many individual records from each receptor, known as “pixies”, each having a particular analogue potential which corresponds to the intensity of the incident light during the time the individual record was captured.
The time available for a receptor to capture this data is very short. In the preferred embodiment, and in other embodiments described e.g. in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,063,599, 5,003,189, 5,063,461, 5,155,776, 5,144,457, 5,259,053 and 5,255,107, the document transport velocity is 300 ips (7.62 mps) and the preferred perceived size of an individual pixel is 0.005″ (0.125 millimeters) square. So the time available for the individual receptor to capture the data related to a particular pixel is 0.005÷300 or approximately 17 millionths of a second (17 microseconds). At the maximum velocity (of which the preferred embodiment is capable), this time may be as brief as 12.5 microseconds. This time is known to workers in the art as “integration time”, since it describes the time available for the photosensitive receptor to gather all the photons which have struck its surface and integrate their energy to produce an analog potential (i.e. electronic image).
The CCPD of choice in the preferred embodiment is the Reticon RL1228D, a linear array device contained in the familiar “chip” -style package, which contains sufficient receptors to allow us to image said documents at the preferred pixel size and can maintain the necessary data rates (up to 80 megabytes per second) to permit imaging at the preferred document speeds. This device is commercially available and attractively priced.
It will thus be seen that the selection of the type and intensity of the document illumination system is very critical and must be closely matched to the physical parameters of the document transport and the electronic characteristics of the CCPD which is to be employed. The illumination system must provide enough light to produce adequate signal from the CCPD under the worst possible conditions for document, transport, CCPD, optics and processing electronics. The illumination system should also provide lighting which is uniform over the entire surface of the document to be imaged, in order that the CCPD may provide a consistent response for a given condition at different points on the document. The illumination must also be correctly devised to accurately render the colour and contrast of the document, since the CCDP is a monochrome device which will render images only in shades of grey. An object hereof is to teach a means of deriving such illumination.
Because of the potential archival nature of the captured image and the many possible uses to which it will be put, a very high standard of legibility must be applied. We expect to satisfy the “eyeball test”—that is, what is visible on the document must be visible in the image. While later electronic processing can remove or suppress selected information, it cannot synthesize data which was not originally captured. Therefore, the illumination must be of sufficient intensity to faithfully render all significant on the document at the same intensities and contrasts as would be observed with the human eye.
Conversely, the image should not contain data which is not visible to the human eye; this might tend to confuse or obscure the imaged data which is human-visible. For this reason, the illumination must also be spectrally correct, taking into consideration the spectral response of the CCPD (which does not necessarily mimic that of the human eye) and the effects of any optical elements used in the image camera. This combined response must approximate the response of the human eye, known to workers in the art as “photopic response.” Failure to match this response may result in startling artifacts in the captured image, such as images of inks or imprints which are not visible to the human eye but are perceived by the CCPD as a result of its own spectral response, or the spectral characteristics of the illumination, or both. Such artifacts are particularly common with the increasing use of security-motivated imprints and watermarks which are invisible to the unaided eye but which will fluoresce in the visible spectrum when illum
Bakker Johan P.
Catchpole Clive E.
Concannon David J.
Copenhaver Gary B.
Vala John D.
Adornato Rocco L.
McCormack John J.
Starr Mark T.
Unisys Corporation
Williams Kimberly A.
LandOfFree
Methods for illuminating documents does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods for illuminating documents, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for illuminating documents will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2525193