Methods for identifying neuronal spikes

Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Detecting brain electric signal

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07957793

ABSTRACT:
A method for identifying neuronal spikes (extracellular action potentials) is described wherein measured microelectrode readings from tissue are reviewed to identify spikes (successive readings having prolonged rises and/or falls). The frequency of such spikes as a function of their amplitude assumes a bimodal distribution wherein higher amplitude spikes represent neuronal spikes (signal) and lower amplitude spikes represent noise, and thus the higher amplitude spikes can be assumed to be neuronal spikes. Neuronal spikes from the same neuron can then be assumed to have substantially the same waveform shape and period, with the only significant difference between them being the scaling of their amplitudes (i.e., the amplitudes of spikes from the same neuron tend to be proportionate at any given time along their period). Thus, by testing identified neuronal spikes for matching timing and for proportional amplitudes, the neuronal spikes may further be identified as coming from the same or different neurons.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4461304 (1984-07-01), Kuperstein
patent: 5398187 (1995-03-01), Yamada et al.
patent: 5928143 (1999-07-01), McNaughton
patent: 6011996 (2000-01-01), Gielen et al.
patent: 6066163 (2000-05-01), John
patent: 6128527 (2000-10-01), Howard, III et al.
patent: 6253109 (2001-06-01), Gielen
patent: 6301492 (2001-10-01), Zonenshayn
patent: 6330466 (2001-12-01), Hofmann et al.
patent: 6343226 (2002-01-01), Sunde et al.
patent: 6354299 (2002-03-01), Fischell et al.
patent: 6366813 (2002-04-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 6368147 (2002-04-01), Swanson
patent: 6454774 (2002-09-01), Fleckenstein
patent: 6459936 (2002-10-01), Fischell et al.
patent: 6463328 (2002-10-01), John
patent: 6484059 (2002-11-01), Gielen
patent: 6495020 (2002-12-01), Swanson
patent: 6539263 (2003-03-01), Schiff et al.
patent: 6567690 (2003-05-01), Giller et al.
patent: 6587724 (2003-07-01), Mann
patent: 6600954 (2003-07-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6606521 (2003-08-01), Paspa et al.
patent: 6662035 (2003-12-01), Sochor
patent: 6684105 (2004-01-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6694162 (2004-02-01), Hartlep
patent: 6731986 (2004-05-01), Mann
patent: 6819956 (2004-11-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 6829498 (2004-12-01), Kipke et al.
patent: 6892098 (2005-05-01), Ayal et al.
patent: 7209787 (2007-04-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 7231254 (2007-06-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 7242984 (2007-07-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 7277758 (2007-10-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 7324851 (2008-01-01), DiLorenzo
patent: 2005/0192646 (2005-09-01), Grayden et al.
patent: 2006/0135862 (2006-06-01), Tootle et al.
Bankman, I.N. , Johnson, K.O. and Schneider, W. “Optimal detection, classification, and superposition resolution in neural waveform recordings,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, pp. 836-841, Aug. 1993.
Buchholz, S.R., Montgomery Jr., E.B., Head restraint device for chronic recording of neural activity in the awake monkey. J. Neurosci. Methods, 1988; 25: 139-42.
Chandra, R. and Optican, L.M., “Detection, classification, and superposition resolution of action potentials in multiunit single-channel recordings by an on-line real-time neural network,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, pp. 403-412, May 1997.
Cocatre-Zilgien, J.H. and Delcomyn, F., “A slope-based approach to spike discrimination in digitized data,” in Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 33. pp. 241-249, 1990.
Datta S, Datta S. Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2003;19:459-466.
Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson'S Disease Study Group. Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease. N. Eng. J. Med., 2001; 345: 956-63.
Falkenberg, J.H. , McNames, J. and Burchiel, K.J. “Statistical methods of analysis and visualization of extracellular microelectrode recordings,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology—Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico, pp. 2515-2518,17-21, Sep. 2003.
Falkenberg, J.H., McNames, J. , Aboy, M., Burchiel, K. J. ,“Segmentation of extracellular microelectrode recordings with equal power,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology—Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico, Sep. 17-21, 2003, pp. 2475-2478.
Gozani, S.N. and Miller, J.P. “Optimal discrimination and classification of neuronal action potential waveforms from multiunit, multichannel recordings using software-based linear filters,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, pp. 358-372, Apr. 1994.
Guedalia I.D., London M., Werman M., An On-Line Agglomerative Clustering Method for Nonstationary Data. Neural Computation 1999;11:521-540.
Hashimoto T., Elder C.M., Vitek, J.L., A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation. J. Neurosci. Methods, 2002; 113: 181-6.
Hulata E., Segev R., Ben-Jacob E., A method for spike sorting and detection based on wavelet packets and Shannon's mutual information. J. Neurosci. Methods, 2002;117:1-12.
Koller, W., Pahwa, R., Busenbark, K., et al., High-frequency unilateral thalamic stimulation in the treatment of essential and parkinsonian tremor. Ann. Neurol., 1997; 42: 292-9.
Lange, T., Roth, V., Braun, M.L., Buhmann, J.M., Stability-Based Validation of Clustering Solutions, Neural Computation 2004;16:1299-1323.
Lewicki, M.S. (1998) “A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials.” Network: Computation in Neural Systems. 9(4): R53-R78.
Montgomery, Jr.E.B., Baker, K.B., Kinkel, R.P., Barnett, G., Chronic thalamic stimulation of the tremor of multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 1999; 53: 625-8.
Montgomery Jr. E.B., Buchholz Sr. The striatum and motor cortex in motor initiation and execution. Brain Res., 1991; 549: 222-9.
Newby, .PK., Tucker, K.L., Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr. Rev. 2004;62:177-203.
Obeid, I. Wolf, P.D., Evaluation of spike-detection algorithms fora brain-machine interface application, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, No. 6, Jun. 2004, pp. 905-911.
Quiroga, R. Q., Nadasdy, Z., Ben-Shaul, Y., Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering, Neural Computation. 2004; 16:1661-1687.
Quirk, M.C., Wilson, M.A., Interaction between spike waveform classification and temporal sequence detection. J. Neurosci. Methods, 1999; 94: 41-52. Erratum in J. Neurosci. Methods, 2000; 99: 143-5.
Santiago, R.A., McNames, J., Burchiel, K., Lendaris, G.G., “An automated method for neuronal spike source identification,” International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Portland, Oregon, Jul. 20-24, 2003, pp. 2837-2842.
Santiago, R.A., McNames, J., Burchiel, K., Lendaris, G.G., “Developments in understanding neuronal spike trains and functional specializations in brain regions,” Neural Networks, vol. 16, No. 5-6, Jun./Jul. 2003, pp. 601-607.
Stata Reference Manual, Stata Statistical Software Release 7.0. StataCorp: Colleage Station, 1985;1:224-235.
Stitt, J.P., Gaumond, R.P., Frazier, J.L., and Hanson, F.E., Action potential classifiers: a functional comparison of template matching, principal components analysis and an artificial neural network Chemical Senses, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 531-539, Oxford University Press (1998).
Theodorakis, S., Koutroumbas, K., Pattern Recognition, second ed. Academic Press: Amsterdam, 2003.
Vercuei,L L., Krack, P., Pollak, P., Results of deep brain stimulation for dystonia: a critical reappraisal. Move. Disord., 2002; 17: S89-93.
Wagenaar, D.A., Potter, S.M., Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting. J. Neurosci. Methods 2002;120:113-120.
Won, D.S., Chong, D.Y. and Wolf, P.D., “Effects of spike sorting error on information content in multi-neuron recordings,” presented at the 1st Int. IEEE EMBS Conf. Neural Engineering, Capri Island, Italy, 2003.
Worgotter, F., Daunicht, W. J. and Eckmiller

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods for identifying neuronal spikes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods for identifying neuronal spikes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for identifying neuronal spikes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2740806

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.