Chemistry of hydrocarbon compounds – Purification – separation – or recovery – By addition of extraneous agent – e.g. – solvent – etc.
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-14
2003-12-09
Griffin, Walter D. (Department: 1764)
Chemistry of hydrocarbon compounds
Purification, separation, or recovery
By addition of extraneous agent, e.g., solvent, etc.
C585S857000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06660899
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to extractive distillation processes and extractive distillation compositions for enhancing the separation of hydrocarbon compounds via extractive distillation. The extractive distillation compositions comprise both organic sulfoxides and organic sulfones.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is difficult to efficiently and economically separate mixtures of organic compounds having similar chemical characteristics, and nearly the same boiling point and/or volatility. Conventional fractional distillation can be expensive and inefficient in this situation, in that large and expensive columns are required, which have large numbers of plates, and utilize high reflux ratios, with correspondingly high energy consumption rates.
Extractive distillation is a technique for separating certain close boiling mixtures. In extractive distillation, a high boiling extractive distillation solvent is typically introduced into a distillation zone containing feed that is to be separated. The high boiling solvent interacts with the feed mixture (which is typically lower boiling than the extractive distillation solvent) to effectively decrease the volatility of some feed mixture components, typically the more polar feed components, so that the less polar feed components can be separated by distillation overhead. The more polar feed components become relatively concentrated in the extractive distillation solvent/composition, and typically exit the distillation zone as a heavy fraction.
An extractive distillation process has been described in the article entitled “Extractive Distillation Saves Money” by Ian Sucksmith, Chemical Engineering, Jun. 18, 1982, pages 91-95. Other literature sources relating to conventional extractive distillation techniques include the “Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers” by Phillip A Schweitzer, McGraw-Hill Book company, 1984, pages 13-53. A variety of methods for employing extractive distillation to separate various classes of hydrocarbons, such as aromatics, olefins, or cycloalkanes, from other close-boiling hydrocarbons, such as paraffins, are known in the hydrocarbons industry. In particular, many refinery streams comprise “BTX” streams composed of close boiling mixtures of aliphatic hydrocarbons (such as isomers of heptane and octane) and aromatic hydrocarbons (such as benzene, toluene, and xylenes).
A variety of extractive distillation compositions have been reported, and a select few are practiced commercially. The most common of these commercially practiced extractive distillation compositions include polyethylene glycols and mixtures thereof (i.e. “Udex” processes). U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,714,033 and 4,921,581 disclose the use of polyalkylene glycol solvents toward this end. Triethylene glycol and tetraethylene glycol are examples of solvents that are commonly employed in such “Udex” processes.
Other processes for extractive distillation of hydrocarbons have employed organic sulfones as extractive distillation solvents. U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,033,942 and 2,831,039 described the use of dialkyl sulfones, including dimethyl sulfone, in such separations. U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,517 relates to the use of C
4
-C
8
sulfones as selective extractive distillation solvent. U.S. Pat. No. 3,146, 190 described the use of sulfolane (tetramethylene sulfone) as a selective extraction solvent for the purification of pyrolysis fuels and catalytically reformed gasolines. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,466,346 and 3,723,256 describe refinements of sulfolane-based extractive distillation processes. Sulfolane is also commercially employed as an extractive distillation solvent for the extractive distillation of hydrocarbon compounds.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has also been described as a solvent in extractive distillation applications. Early examples of DMSO based aromatic extraction processes are described in French Patent No. 1,407,134 and by Krause (Chem. Eng. 54-56 (1966)). British Patent No. I373,325 to Rhone-Progil described the use of DMSO to separate mixtures of meta- and para-dichlorobenzene by extractive distillation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,244 to Gentry, et al., described the use of aqueous solutions of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in separating benzene and other aromatic hydrocarbons from mixed aromatic and non-aromatic hydrocarbon streams.
In the commercially practiced embodiments of extractive distillation processes, the solvent (typically triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, sulfolane, and/or DMSO) is believed to be employed in relatively pure form. Nevertheless, there have been reports the use of additives to enhance extractive distillation performance. Water-sulfolane mixtures are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,982. U.S. Pat. No. 5,032,232 describes combinations of N-alkyl-2-thiopyrrolidones and sulfolane for this purpose. U.S. Pat. No. 4,024,028 describes the use of mixtures of dimethyl sulfone, methyl ethyl ketone and sulfolane for the extractive distillation of hydrocarbon mixtures. One study examined the selectivity and solvent power of various DMSO/ethylene glycol mixtures (O. P. Dimitieva et. al., Obshch. Prikl. Chim. 6, 119-122 (1974)). The separation of toluene from close-boiling non-aromatics by extractive distillation with phthalic anhydride in combination with a variety of solvents, including dimethyl sulfoxide, was described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,363,704. Other additives for combination with various extractive distillation solvents have been reported, but many of them are expensive, or have insufficient thermal and/or chemical stability for practical use in extractive distillation compositions.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,831,039 to Nevitt described the use of various short chain (2-4 Carbon) dialkyl sulfones, including dimethyl sulfone, simultaneously with water from about 1 to about 15% by weight, for separating aromatic hydrocarbons from a non-viscous neutral oil containing aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons boiling in the gasoline boiling range. Nevitt also disclosed the use of a wide variety of optional diluents, in a concentration range from about 0.1 to about 20% by volume, based on the volume of sulfone solvent employed. Among the many diluents disclosed was dimethylsulfoxide. The above described patents are incorporated hereinbelow by reference in their entirety for their disclosures of extractive distillation compositions and processes.
Polyalkylene glycols or sulfolane are the most widely commercially used extractive distillation solvents used in modern hydrocarbon processing. The glycol systems suffer from relatively low extraction selectivity and aromatic loading capabilities as compared to sulfolane. Polyalkylene glycols also suffer from significant thermal and/or oxidative degradation on an annual basis, and therefore necessitate regular makeup of their volume, which incurs significant expense. Use of sulfolane results in improved extraction selectivity and loading levels, as compared to polyalkylene glycols. Nevertheless, the loading capacity of sulfolane is markedly inferior to that of DMSO, at comparable solvent to hydrocarbon feed ratios. While the use of DMSO results in high capacity, the selectivity of the extractive distillation separation for separation of aromatics from aliphatics is poor as compared to the use of either polyethylene glycols or sulfolane.
It has been estimated that approximately 110 glycol based extractive distillation units and about 75 sulfolane based extractive distillation units are currently being operating commercially worldwide. It is also believed that a handful of DMSO based units operate commercially, primarily in France. Wu et al. estimate (Chemical Engineering, page 139, March 1998) that for a typical industrial BTX extraction unit, a 1% increase in aromatics recovery would result in savings of up to $100,000 per year. Such savings derive from both decreased need for capital investment in equipment, and decreased unit energy requirements (electricity, steam, etc.) needed to perform the extractive distillation.
Thus, both technical and financial considerations provide a continui
Donahue Michael D.
Kvakovszky George
McKim Artie S.
Gaylord Chemical Corporation
Griffin Walter D.
Needle & Rosenberg PC
Nguyen Tam M.
LandOfFree
Methods for enhanced aromatic extraction employing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods for enhanced aromatic extraction employing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for enhanced aromatic extraction employing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3095324