Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity...

Details Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity... Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity...

2011-05-03

2011-05-03

Cobanoglu, Dilek B (Department: 3626)

Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co

Automated electrical financial or business practice or...

Finance

C705S03600T

Reexamination Certificate

active

07937305

ABSTRACT:
Methods and systems are provided for processing the financial information of a client of a financial institution. One method embodiment includes receiving data from an overdraft data source including at least one overdraft occurrence associated with a transaction performed in association with the client; analyzing the overdraft occurrence in an overdraft application to determine a cause and disposition of the overdraft occurrence in connection with the cause of the overdraft occurrence; and, communicating an overdraft report associated with the analyzing step to a manager associated with the client. Additional system and computer-readable medium embodiments of the present methods are also provided. In another aspect of the present methods and systems, historical overdraft issues are analyzed and reported to the management of a financial institution. System and computer-readable medium embodiments of these analysis and reporting methods are also provided.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4346442 (1982-08-01), Musmanno
patent: 4989141 (1991-01-01), Lyons et al.
patent: 5093787 (1992-03-01), Simmons
patent: 5412190 (1995-05-01), Josephson et al.
patent: 5649116 (1997-07-01), McCoy et al.
patent: 5696907 (1997-12-01), Tom
patent: 5699528 (1997-12-01), Hogan
patent: 5704045 (1997-12-01), King et al.
patent: 5706442 (1998-01-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5734890 (1998-03-01), Case et al.
patent: 5761441 (1998-06-01), Bennett
patent: 5793771 (1998-08-01), Darland et al.
patent: 5839118 (1998-11-01), Ryan et al.
patent: 5875431 (1999-02-01), Heckman et al.
patent: 5875437 (1999-02-01), Atkins
patent: 5930764 (1999-07-01), Melchione et al.
patent: 5940809 (1999-08-01), Musmanno et al.
patent: 5991750 (1999-11-01), Watson
patent: 6016482 (2000-01-01), Molinari et al.
patent: 6018721 (2000-01-01), Aziz et al.
patent: 6018723 (2000-01-01), Siegel et al.
patent: 6049782 (2000-04-01), Gottesman et al.
patent: 6055505 (2000-04-01), Elston
patent: 6078905 (2000-06-01), Pich-leWinter
patent: 6119103 (2000-09-01), Basch et al.
patent: 6119104 (2000-09-01), Brumbelow et al.
patent: 6128599 (2000-10-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6128603 (2000-10-01), Dent et al.
patent: 6138102 (2000-10-01), Hinckley, Jr.
patent: 6161098 (2000-12-01), Wallman
patent: 6182048 (2001-01-01), Osborn et al.
patent: 6202053 (2001-03-01), Christiansen et al.
patent: 6205434 (2001-03-01), Ryan et al.
patent: 6226624 (2001-05-01), Watson et al.
patent: 6272472 (2001-08-01), Danneels et al.
patent: 2001/0034701 (2001-10-01), Fox et al.
patent: 2002/0120587 (2002-08-01), D'Agostino
patent: 2003/0036993 (2003-02-01), Parthasarathy
patent: 2010/0250422 (2010-09-01), Lego et al.
Conal Gregory, It can pay to watch out for those hidden bank charges, The Scotsman, p. 37, Jan. 23, 1999.
Kirsty Greenwood and Nic Cicutti, Personal Finance: Switching isn't hard to do: More people divorce than change banks. But it's not that traumatic., The Independent, Nov. 7, 1998.
Kirsty Greenwood and Nic Cicutti, “Personal Finance: Switching isn't hard to do: More people divorce than change banks. But it's not that traumatic.”Independent, Nov. 7, 1998, 5 pages.
Conal Gregory, “It can pay to watch out for those hidden bank charges,”Scotsman, p. 37, Jan. 23, 1999, 2 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,593, filed Dec. 28, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,592, filed Dec. 28, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145, filed Nov. 20, 2002.
Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,593.
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,593.
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,593.
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,593.
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,592.
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,592.
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,592.
Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145.
Office Action dated May 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145.
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,550, filed Jun. 24, 2010.
Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/774,394.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145, filed Nov. 20, 2002.
Diana Hancock, James A. Wilcox, David B. Humphrey, “Intraday management of bank reserves: the effects of caps and fees on daylight overdrafts,”Journal of Money, Credit&Banking, Nov. 1996, v 28, n 4, pp. 870-919, printed from http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?req=1262463962662, Internet site, accessed on Jan. 2, 2010, 26 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/033,592, filed Dec. 28, 2001.
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/300,145.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and systems for analyzing the status of an entity... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2650898