Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-06
2002-05-07
Horlick, Kenneth R. (Department: 1656)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or...
Involving nucleic acid
C435S091100, C435S091200, C536S023100, C536S024330
Reexamination Certificate
active
06383755
ABSTRACT:
INTRODUCTION
1. Technical Field
The field of this invention is the polymerase chain reaction.
2. Background of the Invention
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in which a polymerase (typically a thermostable polymerase) is used to produce amplified amounts of nucleic acids from an initial template nucleic acid, finds use in a number of diverse research, clinical, forensic and industrial applications.
One application where PCR finds use is in the study and modification of wild-type protein function by error-prone PCR mutagenesis (Leung et al., infra; Cadwell & Joyce, infra). In error-prone PCR, a gene of interest is amplified by PCR under buffer conditions which promote the random misincorporation of nucleotides. The pool of mutant genes from the error-prone PCR reaction is then cloned and used as a library to search for altered protein function.
In the past, the study of the types of mutations occurring in error-prone PCR has relied directly on DNA sequencing. The high cost and cumbersome work associated with sequencing large numbers of clones has limited the extent of experimentation with respect to error-prone PCR and mutational studies in general. As alternatives to sequencing, several phenotypic assays have been developed which detect mutations by observing losses in streptomycin resistance (Mo et al., infra), changes in the function of the lac operon (e.g. blue/white screening)(Lundberg et al., infra; Barnes, infra), and by reversion of a green fluorescent protein mutant (Cariello et al., infra). In addition, gel-based assays have been developed which include single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) (Brail et al., supra) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (Cariello and Skopek, infra).
While these assays can provide accurate information about the relative extents of mutation occurring in a homogenous gene population, they provide little information about the types of mutations occurring. In addition, the gel-based assays are inherently dependent on an electrophoretic separation for comparison of mutation rates, and the phenotypic methods all require ligation and cell transformation procedures associated with typical recombinant DNA cloning methods.
As such, there is a need for the development of alternative methods of evaluating the fidelity of a polymerase under a given set of PCR conditions. Of particular interest would be the development of a rapid in vitro assay which can easily quantify and characterize the relative levels of random mutations occurring in error-prone PCR.
Relevant Literature
References of interest include: Barnes, “The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion,”
Gene
(1992)112(1):29-35; Brail et al, “Improved polymerase fidelity in PCR-SSCPA,”
Mutat. Res.
(1993) 303(4):171-5; Cadwell et al., “Randomization of genes by PCR mutagenesis,”
PCR Methods Appl.
(1992) 2(1):28-33; Cariello & Skopek, “Mutational analysis using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and PCR,”
Mutat.Res.
(1993) 288(1):103-112; Cariello et al., “A novel bacterial reversion and forward mutation assay based on green fluorescent protein,”
Mutat. Res.
(1998) 414(1-3):95-105; Day et al. “Nucleotide analogs and new buffers improve a generalized method to enrich for low abundance mutations,”
Nuc. Acids Res.
(1999) 27(8): 1819-1827; Fromant et al., “Direct random mutagenesis of gene-sized DNA fragments using polymerase chain reaction,”
Anal. Biochem.
(1995) 224(1):347-53; Halling, “Is random mutation more rational?”
Nat. Biotechnol.
(1996) 14(4):432, 436; Leung, “A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction,”
Technique
(1989) 1(1): 11-15; Lundberg et al., “High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus,”
Gene
(1991) 108(1):1-6; Mo et al., “Mutational specificity of the dnaE173 mutator associated with a defect in the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase III of
Escherichia coli,”J. Mol. Biol.
(1991) 222(4):925-36; Sandy et al., “Genotypic analysis of mutations in Taq I restriction recognition sites by restriction fragment length polymorphism/polymerase chain reaction,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA (Feb. 1992) 89:890-894; Tyagi & Kramer, “Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization,” Nat. Biotechnol. (1996) 14(3):303-308; and Vartanian et al., “Hypermutagenic PCR involving all four transitions and a sizeable proportion of transversions,”
Nucleic Acids Res.
(1996)24(14):2627-31.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Methods of determining the fidelity of a given set of polymerase chain reaction conditions are provided. In the subject methods, a template polydeoxyribonucleotide that includes a pseudo restriction endonuclease site is amplified under the polymerase chain reaction conditions to be evaluated. The pseudo restriction endonuclease site differs from its corresponding true restriction endonuclease site by at least one nucleotide substitution. The resultant amplified product population is then contacted with the corresponding restriction endonuclease and any resultant cleavage products are detected. The detected cleavage products, or absence thereof, are then related to the fidelity of the polymerase chain reaction conditions used to amplify the template polydeoxyribonucleotide. Also provided are kits for practicing the subject methods.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5427929 (1995-06-01), Richards et al.
Stratagene Catalog 1988.*
Wayne M. Barnes, “The fidelity of Taq polymerase catalyzing PCR is improved by an N-terminal deletion”Gene,112 (1992) pp 29-35.
Cariello et al, “A novel bacteria reversion and forward mutation assay based on green fluorescent protein”,Mutation Research 414(1998) 95-105.
Peter Halling, “Is random mutation more rational”,Nature Biotechnology,vol. 14 Apr. 1996.
Lundberg et al., “High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated fromPyrococcus furiosus”,Gene108 (1991) 1-6.
Day et al. “Nucleotide analogs and new buffers improve a generalized method to enrich for low abundance mutations”,Nucleic Acids Research,1999, vol. 27. No. 8.
Cariello et al., Mutational analysis using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and PCR,Mutation Research,288 (1993) 103-112.
Jin-Yao Mo et al, “Mutational Specificity od dnaE173 Mutator Associated with a Defect in the Catalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase III ofEscherichia coli”, J. Mol. Biol(1991) 222, 925-936.
R. Craig Caldwell et al. “Randomization of Genes by PCR Mutagenesis”PCR Methods Appl.(1992) 2(1):28-33.
Brail et al. “Improved polymerase fidelity in PCR-SSCPA”Mutation Research303(1993) 171-175.
Fromant et al. “Direct Random Mutagenesis of Gene-Sized DNA Fragments Using Polymerase Chain Reaction”,Analytical Biochemistry224, 347-353 (1995).
Leung et al. “A method for Random Mutagenesis of a Defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction”,Technique—a Journal of Methods in Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 1, No. 1 (Aug.), 1989: pp. 11-15.
Sandy et al. “Genotypic analysis of mutations in Taq I restriction recognition sites by restriction fragment length polymorphism/polymerase chain reaction”Proc.Natl., Acad. Sci USAvol. 89, pp. 890-894, Feb. 1992 Biochemistry.
Tyagi et al. “Molecular Beacons Probes that Fluoresce upon Hybridization”Nature Biotechnology, vol. 14, Mar. 1996.
Vartanian et al. “Hypermutagenic PCR involving all four transitions and a sizeable proportion of transversions”,Nucleic Acids Research, 1996, vol. 24, No. 14, 2627-2631.
Davis Gregory D.
Wurst Helmut
Bozicevic, Field & Francis
Clontech Laboratories, Inc.
Field Bret E.
Horlick Kenneth R.
Spiegler Alexander H.
LandOfFree
Methods and kits for determining the fidelity of polymerase... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods and kits for determining the fidelity of polymerase..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and kits for determining the fidelity of polymerase... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2908973