Electrolysis: processes – compositions used therein – and methods – Electrolytic coating – Involving measuring – analyzing – or testing
Reexamination Certificate
2002-01-23
2003-07-15
Valentine, Donald R. (Department: 1742)
Electrolysis: processes, compositions used therein, and methods
Electrolytic coating
Involving measuring, analyzing, or testing
C205S335000, C204S232000, C436S043000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06592736
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
One technology that is rapidly coming to the forefront for the formation of microelectronic devices and components is electrochemical deposition, which includes both electroplating and electroless plating of metal to form microelectronic features on a microelectronic workpiece. Though electrochemical deposition has long been employed as a fundamental step in fabrication of multilevel printed circuit boards, application of electrochemical deposition to fill sub-micron interconnect features is relatively recent and poses further additional problems, including the need for more stringent control of the electrolyte bath composition.
Electrochemical deposition is a complex process involving multiple ingredients in the electrolytic bath. If the electrolytic bath is to provide high-quality deposited films (blanket or patterned) on the surface of the substrate, the concentration of several of the constituents of the bath should be maintained. As such, the ability to monitor and control the composition of the bath is one of the important factors in ensuring uniform and reproducible film properties. In semiconductor and microelectronic component applications, the electronic and morphological properties of the metal films are of principal importance in determining final device performance and reliability. The stability of later microfabrication processes in the manufacturing sequence likewise frequently depends on repeatable mechanical properties, including modulus, ductility, hardness, and surface texture of the deposited material. All of these deposit properties are controlled or strongly influenced by the composition of the electrolytic bath.
Measurement and control of proprietary organic compounds that serve to modify the deposit properties through adsorption onto and desorption from the cathode surface during, for example, electroplating, are important since they affect the diffusion rate of metal cations to nucleation and growth sites. These compounds are typically delivered as multi-component packages from chemistry vendors. One of the functions of the additive packages is to influence the throwing power of the electroplating bath: the relative insensitivity of plating rate to variations in cathodic current density across the wafer or in the vicinity of surface irregularities. The throwing power of the electrolyte has an effect on the cross-wafer uniformity of deposited film thickness and the success with which ultrafine trenches and vias (holes) are filled without included seams or voids. Organic additives have also been shown to have substantial effects on mechanical film properties. Detection and quantification of these bath constituents is complicated by the fact that they are effective at very low concentrations in the electrolyte, for example, at several ppm or less.
Bath analysis for microelectronic applications is strongly driven by the need to limit variability and maintain device yields through maintenance of optimized process parameters. One method for controlling such ingredients in an electroplating bath is to make regular additions of particular ingredients based upon empirical rules established by experience. However, depletion of particular ingredients is not always constant with time or use. Consequently, the concentration of the ingredients is not actually known and the level in the bath eventually diminishes or increases to a level where it is out of the acceptable concentration range. If the additive content concentration deviates too far from the target value, the quality of the deposit suffers and the deposit may be dull in appearance and/or brittle or powdery in structure. Other possible consequences include low throwing power and/or plating folds with bad leveling.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
An automated chemical management system for managing the chemical content of an electrochemical bath used to deposit a material on the surface of a microelectronic workpiece is set forth. The automated chemical management system includes a dosing system that is adapted to dose an amount of one or more chemicals to replenish a given electrochemical bath constituent in accordance with a predetermined dosing equation. The chemical management system also includes an analytical measurement system that is adapted to provide a measurement result indicative of the amount of the given constituent in the electrochemical bath at predetermined time intervals. The chemical management system uses the measurement results to modify the dosing equation of the dosing system. In this manner, the replenishment operations executed by the chemical management system are effectively refined over time thereby providing more accurate control of the amount of the target constituent in the electrochemical bath.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3649509 (1972-03-01), Morawetz et al.
patent: 3878066 (1975-04-01), Dettke et al.
patent: 3904493 (1975-09-01), Losi et al.
patent: 4055751 (1977-10-01), Bussmann et al.
patent: 4090926 (1978-05-01), Matson
patent: 4132605 (1979-01-01), Tench et al.
patent: 4146437 (1979-03-01), O'Keefe
patent: 4229218 (1980-10-01), Gulla et al.
patent: 4324589 (1982-04-01), Gulla et al.
patent: 4326940 (1982-04-01), Eckles et al.
patent: 4541902 (1985-09-01), Kinoshita et al.
patent: 4886590 (1989-12-01), Tittle
patent: 4895739 (1990-01-01), Bladon
patent: 4917774 (1990-04-01), Fisher
patent: 4917777 (1990-04-01), Fisher
patent: 4948473 (1990-08-01), Phillippi
patent: 4952286 (1990-08-01), Bladon et al.
patent: 5007990 (1991-04-01), Bladon
patent: 5192403 (1993-03-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5196096 (1993-03-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5223118 (1993-06-01), Sonnenberg et al.
patent: 5234573 (1993-08-01), Takami
patent: 5364510 (1994-11-01), Carpio
patent: 5368715 (1994-11-01), Hurley et al.
patent: 5389215 (1995-02-01), Horiuchi et al.
patent: 5391271 (1995-02-01), Ludwig
patent: 5484626 (1996-01-01), Storjohann et al.
patent: 5534128 (1996-07-01), Aso et al.
patent: 6113769 (2000-09-01), Uzoh et al.
patent: 6254760 (2001-07-01), Shen et al.
patent: 6365033 (2002-04-01), Graham et al.
Sun, Z.-W., and G. Dixit, “Optimized Bath Control for Void-Free Copper Deposition,”Solid State Technology, Nov. 2001.
Lowenheim, F.A.,Electroplating, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1978, pp. 120-121.
Tench, D., and J. White, “Cyclic Pulse Voltammetric Stripping Analysis of Acid Copper Plating Baths,”Journal of the Electrochemical Society 132(4):831-834, 1985.
Willard, H.H., et al.,Instrumental Methods of Analysis, 5th ed., D. Van Nostrand Co., New York, 1974, pp. 647-656.
Fulton Dakin
Ritzdorf Thomas L.
Semitool Inc.
Valentine Donald R.
LandOfFree
Methods and apparatus for controlling an amount of a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods and apparatus for controlling an amount of a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and apparatus for controlling an amount of a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3108834