Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – Aeronautical vehicle
Reexamination Certificate
1998-09-30
2001-02-13
Zanelli, Michael J. (Department: 3661)
Data processing: vehicles, navigation, and relative location
Vehicle control, guidance, operation, or indication
Aeronautical vehicle
C701S003000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06188937
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to aircraft control, and more particularly, to methods and apparatus for displaying aircraft status.
2. Background Art and Technical Problems
Vehicle Control Systems (VCSs) have significantly improved safety, precision, and efficiency of travel. These improvements are due in part to the VCS automating tasks that were previously performed by the vehicle operator. However, while the VCS can provide efficient and optimal control, the vehicle operator is preferably provided with accurate and timely information to monitor vehicle behavior and direct overall vehicle operations. As the accuracy and frequency of information provided to the operator is improved, the operator is better able to make informed decisions, resulting in improved vehicle performance.
One example of a VCS is an aircraft Flight Control System (FCS). A FCS may complete all major tasks associated with flying an aircraft from origin to destination, including flight planning, guidance, control, and navigation. This reduces flight crew workload, improves mission safety, and increases the economy of aircraft operation. However, while these advantages are provided by the FCS, various operational and training issues have been raised, including, but not limited to: discrepancies between a pilot's understanding of the avionics design and actual operation; over-emphasis on the training of required operating procedures and under-emphasis on presenting a model of the actual organization and operation of the avionics system; and the quality and quantity of information presented to the pilot on the avionics displays. These issues are not surprising when the complexity of a FCS is considered in relation to the form and content of the information that is displayed to the flight crew.
For example, consider a Vertical Guidance Component (VGC)
100
of an FCS as shown in FIG.
1
. The VGC
100
suitably maintains a selected vertical profile, for example, by adjusting the pitch of an elevator
102
and thrust of an engine
112
with control signals received from an autopilot
108
and autothrottle
118
. The autothrottle
118
and autopilot
108
may receive manual instructions from the flight crew through the Mode Control Panel (MCP)
120
.
Alternatively, the flight crew may opt to have a Flight Management System (FMS)
110
automatically select pitch modes, attitude targets, thrust modes and/or speed targets. The FMS
110
implements processes and decision-making algorithms which automate various tasks, such as control of pitch, roll, thrust mode selection (i.e., Vertical Navigation (VNAV)), altitude, heading, track, and speed target selection (i.e., FMS SPDS). The processes and decision-making algorithms utilize hundreds of rules and considerations relating to navigation, airspace regulations, aircraft operational limits, and the like, to select the appropriate modes and targets of flight. Once the FMS
110
has selected the appropriate control modes and targets of flight, display signals
122
representing the control signals transmitted to the autopilot and autothrottle are provided to a Flight Mode Annunciator (FMA)
300
of a primary flight display
114
for review by the flight crew.
The FMA
300
typically includes three panels: an autothrottle (speed) display panel
116
, a roll autopilot display panel
118
, and a pitch (altitude) autopilot display panel
120
. Referring to
FIG. 2
, the autothrottle display panel
116
annunciates a speed target
302
and a speed control mode
304
, the roll autopilot display panel
118
presents a heading/track target
306
and a heading/track control mode
308
, and the altitude autothrottle display panel
120
provides an altitude target
310
and an altitude control mode
312
. While these panels may be used by the pilot to determine the current behavior of the aircraft, a significant amount of interpretation remains to specifically identify the current objectives of the aircraft control system. This interpretation problem is exacerbated because some combinations of annunciations are not exclusive to particular modes of flight. For example, the annunciations PITCH and IDLE are used as the annunciation combination for no less than three separate aircraft behaviors. In addition, even after the pilot has interpreted the general behavior, behavior specifics may be unascertainable from the display.
To illustrate, if the pilot has determined the aircraft is in descent, no information is presented as to the purpose or objective of the descent, such as whether the aircraft is in EARLY DESCENT or LATE DESCENT. To determine the exact type of descent, the pilot typically accesses a performance page on a Control Display Unit (CDU) and monitors the path error information, which usually demands the pilot's attention for a substantial period of time.
Due to the large number of processes and algorithms used by VGCs
100
, the limited number of targets and outputs displayed for the flight crew on conventional FMAs
300
within the user display interface
130
, and the complexity and amount of information that is displayed in the cockpit in addition to the targets and outputs on FMA
300
, the flight-crew can lose track of the VGC's
100
intentions and behavior (e.g. climb, cruise, descent, etc.). Furthermore, subtle differences in modes and mode transitions may go unnoticed by the flight crew, the flight crew may incorrectly interpret the system's actions as being inconsistent with expected conduct (i.e. automation surprise), and less than optimal adjustments may be made by the flight crew based upon an incorrect understanding of the system operation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A vehicle control system according to various aspects of the present invention presents a behavior annunciation system for displaying to a vehicle operator the overall travel behavior of a vehicle. The behavior annunciation system has a storage medium for storing various vehicle operational parameters. In addition, the behavior annunciation system has a storage medium for storing various vehicle behavior modes. The behavior annunciation system processes data from the vehicle operational parameters storage medium and the behavior mode storage medium to generate a behavior mode output. The behavior mode output is then displayed to the vehicle operator in a manner which describes the overall behavior of the vehicle.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5359890 (1994-11-01), Fulton et al.
patent: 5412382 (1995-05-01), Leard et al.
patent: 5457634 (1995-10-01), Chakravarty
patent: 5523949 (1996-06-01), Agate et al.
patent: 5978715 (1999-11-01), Briffe et al.
Michael Feary et al., “Aiding Vertical Guidance Understanding”, HCI Aero 98 Conference, Montreal, May 27-29, 1998, pp. 1-7.
Lance Sherry and Peter G. Polson, “A New Conceptual Model for Avionics Annunciation”, Technical Report of the Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Aug. 1995, pp. 1-68.
Sanjay Vakil, “Development and Evaluation of a Prototype Electronic Vertical Situation Display”, May 1996, pp. 3-110.
Asaf Degani et al., “Use of the Operator Function Model to Represent Mode Transitions”, website address http://olias.arc.nasa.gov/publicatios/degani/OSUasaf/OSUasaf.html, printed Feb. 1, 1999, 7 pages.
McCrobie, D.; Sherry L., “Vertical situation awareness and pilot performance”, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1996., 15th AIAA/IEEE, pp. 499-504.
Crowther, E.G.; Chappell, A.R.; Mitchell, C.M.; “VNAV Tutor: system knowledge training for improving pilot's mode awareness”, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994. Humans, Information and Technology., 1994 IEEE International Conference, pp. 747-752, vol. 1.
McCrobie Daniel E.
Sherry Lance C.
Gibson Eric M
Honeywell International , Inc.
Zanelli Michael J.
LandOfFree
Methods and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2593506