Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Electronic shopping

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S037000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07457769

ABSTRACT:
Prospective suppliers competing in an auction format to fulfill a requisition receive assistance in responding to the requisition over a computer network. A plurality of bids responsive to the requisition are received from at least one prospective supplier. At least one initial winning bid is selected from the received bids that at least partially satisfies the requisition. Using the received plurality of bids, at least one proposed bid is determined that, if adopted by a prospective supplier, would constitute a new winning bid. The proposed bid is made available to at least one prospective supplier that had not previously submitted a winning bid.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5615109 (1997-03-01), Eder
patent: 5890138 (1999-03-01), Godin et al.
patent: 6012045 (2000-01-01), Barzilai et al.
patent: 6058379 (2000-05-01), Odom et al.
patent: 6260024 (2001-07-01), Shkedy
patent: 6285989 (2001-09-01), Shoham
patent: 6366891 (2002-04-01), Feinberg
patent: 6415270 (2002-07-01), Rackson et al.
patent: 6449601 (2002-09-01), Friedland et al.
patent: 6584451 (2003-06-01), Shoham et al.
patent: 6598026 (2003-07-01), Ojha et al.
patent: 6606603 (2003-08-01), Joseph et al.
patent: 6631356 (2003-10-01), Van Horn et al.
patent: 6647373 (2003-11-01), Carlton-Foss
patent: 6871191 (2005-03-01), Kinney et al.
patent: 7010511 (2006-03-01), Kinney, Jr. et al.
patent: 2001/0032170 (2001-10-01), Sheth
patent: 2001/0039528 (2001-11-01), Atkinson et al.
patent: 2001/0049634 (2001-12-01), Stewart
patent: 2002/0026429 (2002-02-01), Lostis et al.
patent: 2002/0065764 (2002-05-01), Brodersen et al.
patent: 2002/0103746 (2002-08-01), Moffett, Jr.
patent: 2002/0111897 (2002-08-01), Davis
patent: 2002/0143692 (2002-10-01), Heimermann et al.
patent: 2002/0147674 (2002-10-01), Gillman
patent: 2002/0165813 (2002-11-01), Lee
patent: 2002/0165814 (2002-11-01), Lee et al.
patent: 2003/0004784 (2003-01-01), Li et al.
patent: 2003/0004850 (2003-01-01), Li et al.
patent: 2003/0028473 (2003-02-01), Eso et al.
patent: 2003/0028475 (2003-02-01), Boutilier et al.
patent: 2003/0033236 (2003-02-01), Davenport et al.
patent: 2003/0041014 (2003-02-01), Grey et al.
patent: 2003/0088494 (2003-05-01), Lee
patent: 2003/0195835 (2003-10-01), Sandholm et al.
patent: 2004/0010461 (2004-01-01), Boutilier
patent: 2004/0039680 (2004-02-01), Horch et al.
patent: 2004/0059664 (2004-03-01), Suri et al.
patent: 2004/0059665 (2004-03-01), Suri et al.
patent: 2005/0044032 (2005-02-01), Lee et al.
patent: 1111529 (2001-06-01), None
patent: WO-03034187 (2003-04-01), None
Anon., “Northern Seeks Lowest Bid in Reverse Auction,” Gas Daily, vol. 10, No. 93, May 14, 1993.
Anon., “B2eMarkets Wins GSA Reverse Auction Contract; Government-Wide Acquisition Contract for Software and Services,” PR Newswire, pDCTH00215082002, Aug. 15, 2002.
Jeremie Gallien, “Optimization-Based Auctions and Stochastic Assembly Replenishment Policies For Industrial Procurement”, PhD Thesis in Operations Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2000.
First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226,Sep. 26, 2003, pp. 1-7.
Second Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226, Jul. 7, 2004, pp. 1-37.
C. Bornhovd, M. Cilia, C. Liebig, and A. Buchmann; “An Infrastructure for Meta-Auctions”; IEEE; Jun. 8-9, 2000; pp. 1-10.
Jasmin, Lynda C. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/081,411, mailed Jun. 1, 2005, pp. 1-7.
Colbert, Ella. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226, mailed Jan. 11, 2005, pp. 1-23.
Colbert, Ella. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226, mailed Sep. 12, 2005, pp. 1-16.
Ba et al. “Optimal Investment in Knowledge Within a Firm Using a Market Mechanism” Management Science, vol. 47, Issue 9, Sep. 2001, pp. 1203-1219.
Bakos “The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet” Communications of the ACM archive, vol. 41, Issue 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 35-42.
Emiliani, M.L. “Business-to-Business Online Auctions: Key Issues for Purchasing Process Improvement” Supply Chain Management, vol. 5, Issue 4, 2000, pp. 176-186.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in related U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226, mailed Jul. 10, 2007, 19 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in related U.S. Appl. No. 09/664,226, mailed Mar. 21, 2007, 21 pages.
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in related U.S. Appl. No, 09/664,226, mailed Sep. 19, 2006, 17 pages.
Final Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/081,411, mailed Feb. 26, 2007, 7 pages.
Final Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/081,411, mailed Nov. 16, 2005, 7 pages.
Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 09/999,670, mailed Nov. 22, 2005, 22 pages.
Office Action in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/081,411, mailed Apr. 20, 2006, 6 pages.
Segev et al. “Optimal Design of Internet-Based Auctions” Information Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Apr. 2001, pp. 121-163.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and apparatus for an auction system with interactive... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4044934

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.