Method to reduce leakage during a semi-conductor burn-in...

Semiconductor device manufacturing: process – With measuring or testing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C438S015000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06649425

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
When semi-conductor circuits are fabricated to manufacture such items as a computer microprocessor or other microelectronics, a certain number of failures from the total production run is expected. Typically, these failures come early or late in the life of the circuit.
FIG. 1
shows a graph
10
of the number of expected failures over a period of time. The curve is commonly referred to as a “bathtub curve”. It shows three distinct regions: the “infant stage”
12
, the “operational life stage”
14
; and the “old age stage”
16
. During the infant stage
12
, the number of failures maybe high and they decrease in number rapidly as the curve moves in the operational life stage
14
. While in the operational stage
14
, the number of failures falls to practically zero until the curve moves in the old age stage
16
. Once in the old age stage
16
, the number of failures begins the increase rapidly as the product's effective life expires.
A goal of manufacturers is to get a product over the infant stage
12
quickly in order to weed out defects prior to shipment to the customer. In the case of semi-conductor circuits, this goal is accomplished by a procedure called “burn-in”. The procedure includes subjecting the circuit to stresses such as elevated temperatures and supply voltages as a technique of accelerating the operational life. For example, some semi-conductors have an infant stage that could last as long as 3-4 years of normal operation, while the operational life may last as long as 10 years. Obviously in such a case, a successful burn-in procedure must accelerate the time frame of the bathtub curve. As a result, a standard burn-in process can last about 36-48 hours. The net result is 48 hours in a burn-in procedure can simulate four years of normal operation and thereby greatly increase product reliability for the customer.
FIG. 2
shows a cross-sectional view of a prior art N-type metal oxide semi-conductor field effect transistor (N-type MOSFET). This type of transistor is devices. The transistor includes a gate
26
region, a source
28
region, and a drain
30
region. These regions are located in an architectural layer
32
of P-type material. This P layer
32
further overlays a conductive substrate
34
of doped P+ type material. This P+ substrate
34
is connected to the source voltage (Vss)
38
for the circuit. The source
28
, the gate
26
, and the drain
30
are each provided with a separate metallic lead
22
a
,
22
b
,
22
c
respectively. Each lead
22
a
,
22
b
,
22
c
is connected to its respective region
28
,
26
,
30
through a conductive contact
24
a
,
24
b
,
24
c
. Finally, the source
28
and drain
30
are isolated from other elements of the circuit by respective field oxide regions
36
a
,
36
b
. These regions
36
a
,
36
b
are made of a non-conductive material which prevents the transfer of any transient currents outside the transistor
20
.
During normal operation, a positive voltage is applied to the gate
26
from its metallic lead
22
b
. This effectively turns the transistor
20
“on” and current flows through the device. In order to turn the transistor on, the voltage applied to the gate
26
must be sufficient to overcome the threshold voltage (Vt) that is an inherent characteristic of the device. As the name implies, the threshold voltage is the point where the device switches from the “off” state to the “on” state and vice-versa. Another characteristic of the device is the leakage or standby current. This is the current that normally flows through the device when it is in the “off” state. The threshold voltage and the leakage current have an exponential relationship.
In current circuit design trends, the threshold voltage of semi-conductor devices is being reduced as much as possible to increase the speed of the circuit. While this technique is successful in achieving performance gains, it causes difficulties during the burn-in procedure when the temperatures are increased and the supply voltage may be increased as much as 50% above normal levels. The stresses of burn-in have the effect of increasing the leakage current to unacceptable levels. The solution has been to back off on performance improvements by raising the threshold voltages in order to hold leakage current to acceptable levels during the burn-in procedure.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In some aspects the invention relates to a method for conducting a burn-in procedure for a semi-conductor device comprising: applying a burn-in procedure stress to the semi-conductor device; and applying a negative back-bias voltage to the semi-conductor device.
In an alternative embodiment, the invention relates to a method for conducting a burn-in procedure for a semi-conductor device comprising: step for applying a burn-in procedure stress to the semi-conductor device; and step for applying a negative back-bias voltage to the semi-conductor device.
Advantages of the invention may include, one or more of the following. There is no reduction in performance characteristics of semi-conductors due to leakage current constraints during the burn-in procedure. No alterations of existing statistical reliability baselines are necessary due to modifications in burn-in procedures to accommodate leakage current constraints.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4647956 (1987-03-01), Shrivastava et al.
patent: 4899312 (1990-02-01), Sato
patent: 5949726 (1999-09-01), Tseng et al.
patent: 5981322 (1999-11-01), Keeth et al.
patent: 5999011 (1999-12-01), Chu et al.
patent: 6172554 (2001-01-01), Young et al.
patent: 6195305 (2001-02-01), Fujisawa et al.
PCT International Search Report dated Oct. 15, 2002, 3 pages.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method to reduce leakage during a semi-conductor burn-in... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method to reduce leakage during a semi-conductor burn-in..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method to reduce leakage during a semi-conductor burn-in... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3138739

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.