Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer conferencing – Demand based messaging
Reexamination Certificate
2007-04-12
2011-11-15
Jean-Gilles, Jude J. (Department: 2447)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput
Computer conferencing
Demand based messaging
C719S318000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08060567
ABSTRACT:
A method, system, and data structure for creating electronic calendar entries are disclosed. One aspect of the invention involves a computer data structure that includes an email message with an embedded link. The embedded link contains event information corresponding to multiple parameters for an event described in the email message. The embedded link is configured, upon activation, to initiate generation of an electronic calendar entry form with multiple fields. A plurality of the multiple fields contain event information from the embedded link.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4839853 (1989-06-01), Deerwester et al.
patent: 4965763 (1990-10-01), Zamora
patent: 5966686 (1999-10-01), Heidorn et al.
patent: 5999938 (1999-12-01), Bliss et al.
patent: 6216110 (2001-04-01), Silverberg
patent: 6285999 (2001-09-01), Page
patent: 6369840 (2002-04-01), Barnett et al.
patent: 2002/0194379 (2002-12-01), Bennett et al.
patent: 2003/0115188 (2003-06-01), Srinivasa et al.
patent: 2004/0034635 (2004-02-01), Czarnecki et al.
patent: 2004/0243677 (2004-12-01), Curbow et al.
patent: 2005/0021858 (2005-01-01), Ruston et al.
patent: 2005/0091095 (2005-04-01), Wilbrink et al.
patent: 2005/0149858 (2005-07-01), Stern et al.
patent: 2005/0261011 (2005-11-01), Scott
patent: 2007/0150513 (2007-06-01), Vanden Heuvel et al.
patent: 2007/0226204 (2007-09-01), Feldman
patent: 1104151 (2001-05-01), None
patent: 1109121 (2001-06-01), None
patent: 1808802 (2007-07-01), None
patent: WO 99/38079 (1999-07-01), None
Dawson, F. (“Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification”, RFC 2445, Nov. 1998, pp. 65-68 and 76).
Jackson, K. (“SEXY: The Stanford Event eXtraction sYstem”, Dec. 2003, pp. 1-15).
Black, J. (“Automated Event Extraction from Email”, 2004, pp. 1-12).
Minkov, E. (“Extracting Personal Names from Emails: Applying Named Entity Recognition to Informal Text”, 2004, pp. 1-26).
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/066576, mailed Oct. 2, 2007.
Black, J.A., et al., “Automated Event Extraction From Email,” nlp.stanford.edu/courses/cs224n/2004/jblack-final-report.pdf, 2004.
Califf, M.E., “Relational Learning of Pattern-Match Rules for Information Extraction,” Proceedings CoNLLL97: Computational Natural Language Learning, ACL, 1997.
Carvalho, V.R., et al., “On the Collective Classification of Email ‘Speech Acts’,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , Salvador, Brazil, Aug. 15-19, 2005.
Chinchor, N.A., “Overview of MUC-7/MET-2,” Proceedings of the 7thMessage Understanding Conference, 1998.
Ciravegna, F., “(LP)2: Rule Induction for Information Extraction using Linguistic Constraints,” Technical Report CS-03-07, Dept of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, U.K., Sep. 29, 2003.
Corston-Oliver, Simon, et al., “Integration of Email and Task Lists,” ceas.cc/papers2004/134.pdf, 2004.
Dawson, F., et al., “Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar),” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2445, Nov. 1998.
Freitag, D., “Using Grammatical Interference to Improve Precision in Information Extraction,” ICML-97 Workshop on Automata Induction, Grammatical Inference, and Language Acquisition, Nashville, Tennessee, Jul. 1997.
Hogue, A., et al., “Thresher: Automating the Unwrapping of Semantic Content from the World Wide Web,” Int'l World Wide Web Conf. 2005, May 10-14, 2005, Chiba, Japan, pp. 86-95.
Jackson, K., et al., “Sexy: The Stanford Event eXtraction system,” CS444A Dependable Computer Systems Project, Autumn 2003.
Mani, I., “Recent Developments in Temporal Information Extraction,” Proceedings of RANLP, 2004.
Minkov, E., et al., “Extracting personal Names from Emails: Applying Named Entity Recognition to Informal Text,” Computational Linguistics, 2004.
Modi, P.J., et al., “CMRadar: A Personal Assistant Agent for Calendar Management,” 6th International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems (AOIS), 2004.
Payne, T.R., et al., “Calendar Agents on the Semantic Web,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, pp. 84-86, 2002.
Resig, J., “Date Extraction,” http://ejohn.org/blog/date—extraction, Mar. 28, 2005.
Stevenson, R., “PluggedIn: Online Calendars Make a Comeback,” Yahoo News, http:/
ews.yhoo.com/s
m/20050617/wr—nm/column—pluggedin—....., Jun. 17, 2005.
Yee, K-P., “User-Directed Screen Reading for Context Menus on Freeform Text,” CHI 2003, Apr. 5-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 2 pages.
Zhou, G.D., et al., “Named Entity Recognition using an HMM-based Chuck Tagger,” Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jul. 2002.
“Creating a Calendar Entry From a Lotus Notes Email,” Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Technical Tips (internal firm document), Oct. 17, 2005.
“hCalendar,” Developers Wiki, http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/hCalendar?action=print.
“MUC-7 Table of Content,” Message Understanding Conference Proceedings, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.02/related—projects/muc/proceedings/muc—7—toc.html, last updated Feb. 8, 2005.
“30 Boxes—Help,” http://www.30boxes.com/help.php, printed Mar. 20, 2006, 2 pages.
“Sharing Microsoft Outlook Calendar and Contacts,” http://www.devnewsgroups.net/link.aspx?url=http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/share.htm#info, Jun. 22, 2005, pp. 1-9.
“Spongecell Press Release—New Spongecell calendar the easiest online planning tool for friends to share,” http://shpongcell.com/info/press-release, printed Mar. 21, 2006.
“Spongecell—the absorbful calendar,” http://Spongecell.com, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 23 pages.
“Spongecell releases natural lanaguage Calendaring API,” http://digg.com/technology/Spongecell—releases—natural—language—calendaring—api, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 1 page.
“New Media Crossroads—Blog Archive—30 Boxes v. Spongecell Using Natural Languag . . . ,” http://www.pollackmediagroup.net/wordpress/?p=49, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 10 pages.
Soffront Software Inc., “Soffront Outlook Integration Datasheet,” 2005, 4 pages.
Techcrunch, “30 Boxes Ready to Take Out Online Calendar Space,” http://www.techncruch.com/2006/03/11/30-boxes-ready-to-take-out-online-calendar-space/, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 15 pages.
Techcrunch, “Spongecell, an Ajax Calendar,” http://www.techncruch.com/2006/01/30/Spongecell-an-ajax-calendar/, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 11 pages.
Techcrunch, “Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar,” http://www.techncruch.com/2006/03/08/exclusive-screenshots-google-calendar/, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 17 pages.
Search Engine Journal, “Screenshots of Google Calendar CL2 from TechCrunch,” http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3067, printed Mar. 21, 2006, 5 pages.
Carroll Glenn Alan
Marmaros David
Sjogreen Carl Philip
Venkataramani Harish
Google Inc.
Jean-Gilles Jude J.
Means Jaren M
Morgan & Lewis & Bockius, LLP
LandOfFree
Method, system, graphical user interface, and data structure... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method, system, graphical user interface, and data structure..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method, system, graphical user interface, and data structure... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4255677