Electrolysis: processes – compositions used therein – and methods – Electrolytic erosion of a workpiece for shape or surface... – With control responsive to sensed condition
Reexamination Certificate
1997-06-13
2002-06-04
Bell, Bruce F. (Department: 1741)
Electrolysis: processes, compositions used therein, and methods
Electrolytic erosion of a workpiece for shape or surface...
With control responsive to sensed condition
C205S644000, C205S645000, C205S652000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06398941
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Electrochemical machining (ECM) is a process in which an electrically conductive metal workpiece is shaped by removing material through anodic dissolution. In ECM, the workpiece comprises the anode in an electrolytic cell, the tool comprises the cathode, and an electrolyte is pumped through a gap between the workpiece and the tool. When a potential difference is applied between the tool and the workpiece, current flows through the electrolyte as a result of electrochemical reactions taking place at the surfaces of both electrodes. The reaction at the anode workpiece surface removes material by the oxidation of metal atoms, while the cathode surface is typically unaffected by the reduction reaction occurring there. ECM is a non-contact machining process that can quickly shape any electrically conductive material regardless of the hardness or toughness of the material. The ECM process is also advantageous because it does not produce residual stresses in the workpiece.
In ECM, the tool is formed as an approximately complementary shape of the desired workpiece shape. The tool geometry is copied into the workpiece by electrochemical dissolution to obtain the desired workpiece shape. During the copying process, a gap is established between the tool and the workpiece, as the tool feed rate becomes substantially equal to the rate of workpiece dissolution. The gap size often varies significantly at different locations over the machining region due to, primarily, the non-uniformity of the electric field and temperature field in the region. As a result, the workpiece does not take on the exact shape of the tool. To obtain a desired workpiece shape with desired accuracy, the tool geometry is modified to compensate for the non-uniform gap distribution over the machining region.
Modeling of the relationship between the shape of the tool and the resulting shape of the workpiece can be complex due to modeling of the electrolyte flow, modeling of the electrochemical reactions in the gap region, tool surface, and workpiece surface, and modeling of the electric field which is influenced by all of these factors. Thus, the problem of predicting the workpiece surface resulting from a known tool shape (commonly known as “the direct problem”) can be relatively complex.
The problem of determining a tool shape based on a desired workpiece shape (commonly known as “the inverse problem”), introduces an additional degree of complexity. Known methods of determining a tool shape based on a desired workpiece shape typically utilize an iterative process. For example, Shuvra Das et al.,
Use of Boundary Element Method for the Determination of Tool Shape in Electrochemical Machining
, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 35, 1045-1054 (1992), describes an algorithm based on the boundary integral equation technique which utilizes a non-linear optimization method. Through an iterative process, the shape of the cathode tool is determined by minimizing a functional. In this approach, the inverse problem is converted to a direct problem by assuming a tool shape and its boundary conditions, and the shape is adjusted based on the feedback from the computed results. This approach typically takes a large amount of computational resources to complete the iterations and may have problems with convergence. The iterations also introduce approximations which adversely affect the accuracy of the results.
It would be desirable, therefore, to have a method for directly determining the tool shape needed to produce a desired workpiece shape, without iteration, and without approximation.
SUMMARY
A method of shaping a tool, according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, comprises the steps of defining a shape of an article to be formed with the tool as a plurality of first elements; defining an initial shape of the tool as a plurality of second elements; determining an electric potential of each of the first and second elements; determining an equipotential line between the article and the initial tool shape based on the electric potential of the first and second elements; and forming the tool to have a shape coincident with the equipotential line.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3271281 (1966-09-01), Brown et al.
patent: 4217190 (1980-08-01), Neal et al.
patent: 5567300 (1996-10-01), Datta et al.
patent: 5567304 (1996-10-01), Datta et al.
H. A. Nied and M. S. Lamphere, Boundary Element Modeling of the Electrochemical Machining Process, Proc. Numiform Conference, Cornell University, Jun. 18-21, 1995.
H.A. Nied and M.S. Lamphere, 2D Electrochemical Airfoil Machining Process Model, 95-GT-272 Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. (1995). No month avail.
C. A. Brebbia and J. Dominguez, Boundary Elements, an Introductory Course, table of contents, 45-56 (1989). No month avail.
Y. Zhou and J. J. Derby, The Cathode Design Problem in Electrochemical Machining, 50 Chem. Eng. Sci. 2679-2689 (1995). No month avail.
S. Das and A. K. Mitra,Use of Boundary Element Method for the Determination of Tool Shape in Electrochemical Machining, 35 Int. J. Numerical Methods in Eng. 1045-1054 (1992), No Month avail.
D. Zhu and C.Y. Yu, Investigation on the Design of Tool Shape in ECM, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., Production Engineering Division, vol. 58, Precision Machining: Technology and Machine Development and Improvement 181-190 (1992). No month avail.
Roland Hunt, An Embedding Method of the Numerical Solution of the Cathode Design Problem in Electrochemical Machining, 29 Int'l J. for Numerical Meth. in Eng. 1177-1192 (1990). No month avail.
A.L. Krylov, The Cauchy Problem for the Laplace Equation in the Theory of Electrochemical Metal Machining, 13 Soviet Physics 15-17 (1968). No month avail.
H.A. Nied and E.M. Perry,Finite Element Simulation of the Electrochemical Machining Process, 20 Computer Modeling and Simulation of Manufacturing Processes (ASME) 37-57 (1990), No Month avail.
R.H. Nilson and Y.G. Tsuei, Free Boundary Problem for the Laplace Equation with Application to ECM Tool Design, Journal of Applied Mechanics; Transactions of the ASME 54-58 (Mar. 1976).
Bell Bruce F.
Cabou Christian G.
General Electric Company
Nicolas Wesley A.
Patnode Patrick K.
LandOfFree
Method of shaping a workpiece using an electrochemical... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method of shaping a workpiece using an electrochemical..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method of shaping a workpiece using an electrochemical... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2944828